Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1022611
An observational, multicentre study on different insulin glargine U100 titration algorithms used in patients with type 2 diabetes in daily medical practice in Adriatic countries: The ADRESA study
An observational, multicentre study on different insulin glargine U100 titration algorithms used in patients with type 2 diabetes in daily medical practice in Adriatic countries: The ADRESA study // Diabetes research and clinical practice, 150 (2019), 144-149 doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2019.01.001 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1022611 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
An observational, multicentre study on different
insulin glargine U100 titration algorithms used in
patients with type 2 diabetes in daily medical
practice in Adriatic countries: The ADRESA study
Autori
Krnić, Mladen ; Marolt, Iris ; Skelin, Marko ; Grulović, Natasa ; Rahelić, Dario
Izvornik
Diabetes research and clinical practice (0168-8227) 150
(2019);
144-149
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
glycaemic control ; HbA1c ; insulin glargine ; titration algorithms ; type 2 diabetes mellitus
Sažetak
Abstract AIMS: To compare the effectiveness of different titration algorithms for insulin glargine U100 used in everyday practice to achieve glycaemic targets in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: A total of 526 patients (278 in Slovenia, 248 in Croatia) with T2DM (aged ≥ 18 years) and treated with insulin glargine prior to inclusion were enrolled. Patients self- titrated insulin glargine according to physicians' guidance. RESULTS: Among the 524 patients included in the final analysis, the titration algorithm from the LANMET study was used most commonly (n = 368, 70.5% patients), followed by the Treat-To- Target (TTT) algorithm (n = 117, 22.4%). At the end of the study (6 months), 179 (34.3%) patients reached HbA1c ≤ 7%. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who reached their target HbA1c between the different algorithms at 6 months (35.6% using LANMET, 30.7% with TTT, and 32.4% with other algorithms ; p = 0.611). HbA1c levels were more significantly reduced in patients using the TTT algorithm compared to LANMET (-2.31%, vs. -1.57% ; p < 0.05). The proportion of patients with reported symptomatic hypoglycaemia did not differ significantly between the algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous titration of insulin glargine U100 is a safe and efficient option for T2DM management, regardless of the titration algorithm applied.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
KBC Split,
Opća bolnica Šibenik,
Medicinski fakultet, Split
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE