Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1016459
The Epistemic Value of Partisanship
The Epistemic Value of Partisanship // Croatian journal of philosophy, 19 (2019), 1; 99-117 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1016459 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
The Epistemic Value of Partisanship
Autori
Cerovac, Ivan
Izvornik
Croatian journal of philosophy (1333-1108) 19
(2019), 1;
99-117
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Epistemic democracy, group polarisation, partisanship, affiliation, epistemic injustice
Sažetak
This paper discusses the epistemic value of political parties and other partisan associations from the standpoint of epistemic democracy. It examines whether political parties contribute to the quality of democratic deliberation, thus increasing the epistemic value of democratic decision-making procedures, or represent a threat that polarises the society and impedes and distorts the public deliberation. The paper introduces several arguments that support the epistemic value of partisanship. Partisan associations empower otherwise marginalized social groups or groups that have disproportionally small political influence by facilitating political education or by connecting citizens and experts who share the same values. Partisan associations also help us resist the epistemically damaging effects of hermeneutical (epistemic) injustice by enabling marginalised citizens to construct alternative discourses. However, though partisanship might facilitate the transmission of knowledge, this deliberative tool will only be used in a group of like-minded citizens (i.e. within a political party), thus increasing the polarization between the parties and citizens alike, and decreasing the epistemic value of such collective decision-making procedures. The paper analyses some epistemic strategies (like red-teaming or building a critical thinking culture) that can help us avoid or (at least) reduce the epistemically damaging effects of polarization. However, internal action (from within a deliberative group) might not be enough. Making the deliberation on political issues public and spreading it through different forms of citizens’ organizations will ensure that political deliberation is not closed within a single homogenous deliberating group (i.e. the party). These practices should significantly reduce the damaging effects of group polarization.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Politologija, Filozofija
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
UIP-2017-05-3462 - Dobrobit, pripadnost i društvena pravednost (Dobrobit/WellBeing) (Zelič, Nebojša, HRZZ - 2017-05) ( CroRIS)
Ustanove:
Filozofski fakultet, Rijeka
Profili:
Ivan Cerovac
(autor)
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus