Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1014993
Mono and polytherapy in everyday practice - our experience
Mono and polytherapy in everyday practice - our experience // Epilepsia, Special Issue:31st International Epilepsy Congress Istanbul, Turkey 5th–9th September, 2015
Istanbul, Turska, 2015. str. 134-135 (poster, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1014993 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Mono and polytherapy in everyday practice - our experience
Autori
Marković, Ivana ; Sporiš, Davor ; Šušak, Ivana ; Bašić, Silvio
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Izvornik
Epilepsia, Special Issue:31st International Epilepsy Congress Istanbul, Turkey 5th–9th September, 2015
/ - , 2015, 134-135
Skup
31st International Epilepsy Congress Istanbul
Mjesto i datum
Istanbul, Turska, 05.09.2015. - 09.09.2015
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Poster
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
epilepsy ; monotherapy ; polytherapy
Sažetak
Purpose: To evaluate factors which could have an influence on the number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in epilepsy treatment and to correlate the number of AEDs in therapy with disease control. Method: 248 patients with epilepsy were included in the analysis.Inclusion criteria were the diagnosis of epilepsy, good compliance and available brain MRI finding. Results: There is statistically significant difference in the number of AEDs in therapy between patients with good seizure control and nonresponders to the AED therapy (p < 0.001). Twenty-nine different combinations were used in patients on two AEDs, twenty-seven in patients with three AEDs and fourteen in patients on four AEDs. Patients on four and more AEDs in therapy are all non-responders.In the group of patients with good seizure control the number of AEDs in therapy has no influence on the length of the seizure free period(p = 0.11). There is no statistically significant difference between patient swith generalised and those with partial seizures as First presentation of the disease and the number of AEDs in the further therapy (p = 0.08). Patients experiencing more than one seizure type in their history take more AEDs than those with only one seizure type (p < 0.001) ; they also have shorter seizure free period than those with only one seizure type (p = 0.007). Epilepsy etiology has no influence on the number of AEDs in therapy(p = 0.94). Conclusion: Initial presentation of the disease and the ethiology have no influence on the number of AEDs in therapy while more different seizure types in patient's hystory increases the possibility of higher number of AEDs in the further therapy and lower seizure control.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Klinička bolnica "Dubrava",
Medicinski fakultet, Osijek
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE