Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 986723
The Structure of Coordination: Evidence from Croatian Church Slavonic
The Structure of Coordination: Evidence from Croatian Church Slavonic // Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Third Cornell Meeting 2016 / Browne, Wayles ; Despić, Miloje ; Enzinna, Naomi ; Harmath-de Lemos, Simone ; Karlin, Robin ; Zec, Draga (ur.).
Ann Arbor (MI): Michigan Slavic Publications, 2018. str. 200-213 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 986723 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
The Structure of Coordination: Evidence from Croatian Church Slavonic
Autori
Mihaljević, Milan
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni
Izvornik
Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Third Cornell Meeting 2016
/ Browne, Wayles ; Despić, Miloje ; Enzinna, Naomi ; Harmath-de Lemos, Simone ; Karlin, Robin ; Zec, Draga - Ann Arbor (MI) : Michigan Slavic Publications, 2018, 200-213
ISBN
9780930042363
Skup
25th Annual Meeting Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics (FASL 25)
Mjesto i datum
Ithaca (NY), Sjedinjene Američke Države, 13.05.2016. - 15.05.2016
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
syntax, coordination, Croatian Church Slavonic language
Sažetak
There are, at the moment, two major approaches to the structure of coordination. The first treats the coordinator as the head, the second conjunct as the complement and the first conjunct as the specifier of that head.According to the second approach the coordinator and the second conjunct are adjoined to the first conjunct, which is the head of the whole coordination. The author concludes that the adjunction approach is more appropriate for analysis of the Croatian Church Slavonic conjunction i than the first approach since the lexical status of the CCS word i is less problematic in the adjunction approach. This approach lets us treat the conjunction and the particle as instances of the same lexeme.At the moment he has no empirical argument as regards whether i should be treated as a head or as an adjunct (adverb), as suggested by Moltmann (1992). The second solution has one theoretical advantage, since in that case we don't need categories without category features.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Filologija