Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 893070
Nursing Students’ Expectations and Evaluations of Mentors’ Competences and Mentors’ Self- Evaluations as Indicators of Mentoring Process Quality
Nursing Students’ Expectations and Evaluations of Mentors’ Competences and Mentors’ Self- Evaluations as Indicators of Mentoring Process Quality // American Journal of Nursing Science, 6 (2017), 5; 382-386 doi:10.11648/j.ajns.20170605.12 (podatak o recenziji nije dostupan, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 893070 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Nursing Students’ Expectations and Evaluations
of Mentors’ Competences and Mentors’ Self-
Evaluations as Indicators of Mentoring Process
Quality
Autori
Lovrić, Robert ; Prlić, Nada ; Barać, Ivana ; Radić Radivoje
Izvornik
American Journal of Nursing Science (2328-5745) 6
(2017), 5;
382-386
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Nurse ; Mentoring ; Evaluation ; Quality Indicators
Sažetak
Important information about the clinical education can be revealed by nursing students’ initial expectations and final evaluation of mentors’ competences, and mentor’s self- evaluation of their competences. The aim of this study was to examine whether these constructs can be used for evaluating the atmosphere in clinical education. This was a nonexperimental prospective study. Data were collected between January and April 2012, in 12 clinics at the University Hospital Osijek. The participants were undergraduate nursing students in years 1, 2, and 3 (n = 150) and their mentors (n = 35) at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Osijek, during the academic year of 2012/2013. The instrument was a modified version of the questionnaire taken from The Nursing Clinical Teacher Effectiveness Inventory (NCTEI). Prior to clinical practice, the students evaluated the desirability of each competence expected from a mentor ; after the clinical practice, the students estimated how often their mentor possessed and applied those competences. Mentors have evaluated their own competences according to the same items. Comparison of students’ expectations and estimates shows significantly higher expectations of first and third year students (p<0.001). Mentors’ self-assessed competences, compared to students' evaluations, were rated significantly higher by mentors of all three years (p<0, 001). The comparison of nursing students’ initial expectations and final evaluation of mentors’ competences, and mentor’s self-evaluation of their competences, when they are significantly different, can provide relevant information about potential problem in clinical education.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Osijek,
Fakultet za dentalnu medicinu i zdravstvo, Osijek
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Uključenost u ostale bibliografske baze podataka::
- Cross Ref
- World Cat
- Academic Keys
- Universal Impact Factor