Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 808260
Feedback of individual genetic results to research participants: Is it feasible in Europe?
Feedback of individual genetic results to research participants: Is it feasible in Europe? // Biopreservation and Biobanking, 14 (2016), 3; 241-248 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 808260 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Feedback of individual genetic results to research participants: Is it feasible in Europe?
Autori
Budin-Ljøsne, Isabelle ; Mascalzoni, Deborah ; Soini, Sirpa ; Machado, Helena ; Kaye, Jane ; Beate Bentzen, Heidi ; Rial-Sebbag, Emmanuelle ; D'Abramo, Flavio ; Witt, Michał ; Schamps, Geneviève ; Katić, Višnja ; Krajnović, Dušanka ; Working Group 1 COST Action CHIP ME IS1303 “Citizen's Health through public-private Initiatives: Public health, Market and Ethical perspectives” ; Harris ; Jennifer R
Izvornik
Biopreservation and Biobanking (1947-5535) 14
(2016), 3;
241-248
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
genetic research ; feedback of results ; legal frameworks ; research participants
Sažetak
Background: There is growing consensus that individual genetic research results that are scientifically robust, analytically valid, and clinically actionable should be offered to research participants. However, the general practice in European research projects is that such results are usually not provided to research participants for many reasons. This paper reports on the views of European experts and scholars who are members of the European COST Action CHIP ME IS1303 (Citizen's Health through public-private Initiatives: Public health, Market and Ethical perspectives) regarding challenges to the feedback of individual genetic results to research participants in Europe, and potential strategies to address these challenges. Methods: A consultation of the COST Action members was conducted through an email survey and a workshop. The results from the consultation were analysed following a conventional content analysis approach. Results: Legal frameworks, professional guidelines, financial, organizational and human resources to support the feedback of results are largely missing in Europe. Necessary steps to facilitate the feedback process include clarifying legal requirements to the feedback of results, developing harmonized European best practices, promoting interdisciplinary and cross- institutional collaboration, designing educational programs and cost-efficient IT-based platforms, involving research ethics committees and documenting the health benefits and risks of the feedback process. Conclusions: Co-ordinated efforts at pan-European level are needed to enable equitable, scientifically sound and socially robust feedback of results to research participants.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Temeljne medicinske znanosti, Kliničke medicinske znanosti, Dentalna medicina
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE