Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 780028

Performance comparison of low-budget 3D printers


Godec, Damir; Radoš, Ivan; Šercer, Mladen
Performance comparison of low-budget 3D printers // Polymer Processing Society / Holzer, Clemens ; Laske, Stephan ; Payer, Martin (ur.).
Graz: PPS, 2015. str. 246-246 (plenarno, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 780028 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Performance comparison of low-budget 3D printers

Autori
Godec, Damir ; Radoš, Ivan ; Šercer, Mladen

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni

Izvornik
Polymer Processing Society / Holzer, Clemens ; Laske, Stephan ; Payer, Martin - Graz : PPS, 2015, 246-246

Skup
Regional Conference Polymer Processing Society Graz 2015, PPS2015

Mjesto i datum
Graz, Austrija, 21.09.2015. - 25.09.2015

Vrsta sudjelovanja
Plenarno

Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija

Ključne riječi
Dimensional stability; fused deposition modeling - FDM; roughness

Sažetak
Additive technologies have begun its development and application since the second half of the 1980s. The main reason behind that was to fulfil the market demands of increased product quality, flexibility, lower costs, shorter development time and production, as well as small series and individual production. As part of additive technologies, low-budget 3D printers have been developed and are widely available now, and they have enabled a significant expansion of the application of additive technologies for development and production. A large number of low-budget 3D printers on the market make it difficult for the potential investor to choose from. Therefore, potential investor in lowbudget 3D printers has to know more detailed their working principle, their construction, materials that they can process and the errors and problems of their technology that occur during processing. In the paper, two most popular low-budget 3D printers MakerBot Replicator 2X and Ultimaker Original was chosen for a detailed comparison. Two reference models were selected for detailed comparison of their performance. Evaluation was made based on final model properties such as deviations from nominal dimensions, shrinkage and surface roughness.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Strojarstvo



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Fakultet strojarstva i brodogradnje, Zagreb

Profili:

Avatar Url Damir Godec (autor)

Avatar Url Mladen Šercer (autor)


Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Godec, Damir; Radoš, Ivan; Šercer, Mladen
Performance comparison of low-budget 3D printers // Polymer Processing Society / Holzer, Clemens ; Laske, Stephan ; Payer, Martin (ur.).
Graz: PPS, 2015. str. 246-246 (plenarno, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
Godec, D., Radoš, I. & Šercer, M. (2015) Performance comparison of low-budget 3D printers. U: Holzer, C., Laske, S. & Payer, M. (ur.)Polymer Processing Society.
@article{article, author = {Godec, Damir and Rado\v{s}, Ivan and \v{S}ercer, Mladen}, year = {2015}, pages = {246-246}, keywords = {Dimensional stability, fused deposition modeling - FDM, roughness}, title = {Performance comparison of low-budget 3D printers}, keyword = {Dimensional stability, fused deposition modeling - FDM, roughness}, publisher = {PPS}, publisherplace = {Graz, Austrija} }
@article{article, author = {Godec, Damir and Rado\v{s}, Ivan and \v{S}ercer, Mladen}, year = {2015}, pages = {246-246}, keywords = {Dimensional stability, fused deposition modeling - FDM, roughness}, title = {Performance comparison of low-budget 3D printers}, keyword = {Dimensional stability, fused deposition modeling - FDM, roughness}, publisher = {PPS}, publisherplace = {Graz, Austrija} }




Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font