Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 752299
Krapina 1 : a juvenile Neandertal from the early late Pleistocene of Croatia
Krapina 1 : a juvenile Neandertal from the early late Pleistocene of Croatia // American journal of physical anthropology, 111 (2000), 3; 393-424 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(200003)111:33.0.CO ; 2-U (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 752299 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Krapina 1 : a juvenile Neandertal from the early late Pleistocene of Croatia
Autori
Minugh-Purvis, Nancy ; Radovčić, Jakov ; Smith, Fred H.
Izvornik
American journal of physical anthropology (0002-9483) 111
(2000), 3;
393-424
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Skull - anatomy & histology; Hominidae - classification
Sažetak
The juvenile A Skull from Krapina, Croatia (Krapina 1) has been the subject of considerable debate since B. Skerlj first suggested that it might not be a Neandertal. Although widely known by its original designation, the Krapina A Skull was recatalogued, along with all of the Krapina hominids, in the 1980's (Radovcic, et al., [1988]. The Krapina Hominids: An Illustrated Catalog of Skeletal Collection. Zagreb ; Mladost). It is now catalogued as Krapina 1 in the archives of the Hrvatski Prirodoslovni Muzej, Zagreb, Croatia. We present a detailed, morphometric analysis of this specimen, comparing it to other Krapina specimens, juvenile late Pleistocene hominids (including Neandertals), and subadult recent humans. This analysis demonstrates that Krapina 1 possesses morphological features that are primitive retentions ; others that represent derived Neandertal specializations ; and still others that are typical for all European late Pleistocene humans. Morphological features associated with the browridges are intermediate between Neandertal and early modern European form. Nevertheless, a thorough analysis of the morphology of this specimen, in ontogenetic and regional contexts, leads to the conclusion that it cannot be excluded from the Neandertal range of variation. We conclude that the most parsimonious explanation for this 130 ka specimen is that it should be regarded as a Neandertal.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE