Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 702035
Phylogeny of the Centaurea group (Centaurea, Compositae) – Geography is a better predictor than morphology
Phylogeny of the Centaurea group (Centaurea, Compositae) – Geography is a better predictor than morphology // Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, 77 (2014), 195-215 doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2014.04.022 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 702035 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Phylogeny of the Centaurea group (Centaurea,
Compositae) – Geography is a better predictor than
morphology
Autori
Hilpold, Andreas ; Vilatersana, Roser ; Susanna, Alfonso ; Meseguer, Andrea S. ; Boršić, Igor ; Constantinidis, Theophanis ; Filigheddu, Rossella ; Romaschenko, Konstantin ; Suárez-Santiago, Víctor N. ; Tugay, Osman ; Uysal, Tuna ; Pfeil, Bernard E. ; Garcia-Jacas, Núria
Izvornik
Molecular phylogenetics and evolution (1055-7903) 77
(2014);
195-215
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
centaurea ; hybridization ; incomplete lineage sorting ; mediterranean ; molecular dating ; phylogenetic incongruence
Sažetak
The Centaurea group is part of the Circum- Mediterranean Clade (CMC) of genus Centaurea subgenus Centaurea, a mainly Mediterranean plant group with more than 200 described species. The group is traditionally split on morphological basis into three sections: Centaurea, Phalolepis and Willkommia. This division, however, is doubtful, especially in light of molecular approaches. In this study we try to resolve this phylogenetic problem and to consolidate the circumscription and delimitation of the entire group against other closely related groups. We analyzed nuclear (internal transcribed spacer of the ribosomal genes) and chloroplast (rpl32-trnL intergenic spacer) DNA regions for most of the described species of the Centaurea group using phylogenetic and network approaches, and we checked the data for recombination. Phylogeny was used to reconstruct the evolution of the lacerate- membranaceous bract appendages using parsimony. The magnitude of incomplete lineage sorting was tested estimating the effective population sizes. Molecular dating was performed using a Bayesian approach, and the ancestral area reconstruction was conducted using the Dispersal–Extinction– Cladogenesis method. Monophyly of the Centaurea group is confirmed if a few species are removed. Our results do not support the traditional sectional division. There is a high incongruence between the two markers and between genetic data and morphology. However, there is a clear relation between geography and the structure of the molecular data. Diversification in the Centaurea group mainly took place during the Pliocene and Pleistocene. The ancestral area infered for the Circum-Mediterranean Clade of Centaurea is the Eastern Mediterranean, whereas for the Centaurea group it is most likely NW-Africa. The large incongruencies, which hamper phylogenetic reconstruction, are probably the result of introgression, even though the presence of incomplete lineage sorting as an additional factor cannot be ruled out. Convergent evolution of morphological traits may have led to incongruence between morphology-based, traditional systematics and molecular results. Our results also cast major doubts about current species delimitation.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Biologija
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE