Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 618661

Reply to Criticisms of the (Means of) Execution Thesis as a Kind of Legal Sanction


Burazin, Luka
Reply to Criticisms of the (Means of) Execution Thesis as a Kind of Legal Sanction // ARSP. Archiv. für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 99 (2013), 1; 68-76 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 618661 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Reply to Criticisms of the (Means of) Execution Thesis as a Kind of Legal Sanction

Autori
Burazin, Luka

Izvornik
ARSP. Archiv. für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie (0001-2343) 99 (2013), 1; 68-76

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
sanction; execution; means of execution; damage reparation; individualisation of sanction

Sažetak
The paper first outlines the thesis on (the means of) execution as a kind of legal sanction (esp. in the case of causing damage). It then sets out the basic theoretical arguments for rejecting the viewpoint according to which the duty of repair represents a sanction in the case of causing damage. The paper goes on to present the viewpoints of several legal philosophers (Bucher, MacCormick, Padjen, Pokrovac) who raised objections to the thesis on (the means of) execution. Finally, it critically analyses these objections and sets out six additional arguments with a view to strenghtening the said thesis.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Pravo



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Pravni fakultet, Zagreb

Profili:

Avatar Url Luka Burazin (autor)


Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Burazin, Luka
Reply to Criticisms of the (Means of) Execution Thesis as a Kind of Legal Sanction // ARSP. Archiv. für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 99 (2013), 1; 68-76 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
Burazin, L. (2013) Reply to Criticisms of the (Means of) Execution Thesis as a Kind of Legal Sanction. ARSP. Archiv. für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 99 (1), 68-76.
@article{article, author = {Burazin, Luka}, year = {2013}, pages = {68-76}, keywords = {sanction, execution, means of execution, damage reparation, individualisation of sanction}, journal = {ARSP. Archiv. f\"{u}r Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie}, volume = {99}, number = {1}, issn = {0001-2343}, title = {Reply to Criticisms of the (Means of) Execution Thesis as a Kind of Legal Sanction}, keyword = {sanction, execution, means of execution, damage reparation, individualisation of sanction} }
@article{article, author = {Burazin, Luka}, year = {2013}, pages = {68-76}, keywords = {sanction, execution, means of execution, damage reparation, individualisation of sanction}, journal = {ARSP. Archiv. f\"{u}r Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie}, volume = {99}, number = {1}, issn = {0001-2343}, title = {Reply to Criticisms of the (Means of) Execution Thesis as a Kind of Legal Sanction}, keyword = {sanction, execution, means of execution, damage reparation, individualisation of sanction} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Scopus
  • HeinOnline





Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font