ࡱ> FHEr@bjbjqq 4Dee..qqqqqt |$$ "Qqqq6rrr qqrrr:,iiq*. L0|R#,F##qrr|#. 7:DNA DAMAGE AND ALTERATIONS IN ZEBRAFISH GENOME UPON EXPOSURE TO MODEL GENOTOXICANTS M.`rut1, A. `tambuk1, J.-P. Bourdineaud2, G.I.V. Klobu ar1 1Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Rooseveltov trg 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia (msrut@biol.pmf.hr; astambuk@biol.pmf.hr; gklobuca@biol.pmf.hr) 2Arcachon Marine Station, CNRS, UMR EPOC 5805, University of Bordeaux, Place du Docteur Peyneau, 33120 Arcachon, France (jean-paul.bourdineaud@u-bordeaux1.fr) DNA damage detected by methods such as Comet assay is not always a reliable indicator of the influence of genotoxic agents on genome integrity of exposed organisms. Therefore, in order to evaluate DNA damage, its reparability and persistence that may lead to alterations of DNA structure upon the genotoxic stress, in vivo and in vitro zebrafish (Danio rerio) models were exposed to benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) and ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) for 6 days followed by 6 days recovery period. DNA damage in zebrafish embryonic cell line (PAC2) and zebrafish larvae was assessed using Comet assay. Furthermore, quantitative RAPD (random amplified polymorphic DNA) and AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) were applied to measure more permanent DNA alterations. While Comet assay revealed significant increase of DNA damage in zebrafish larvae following both toxicant treatments and in PAC2 cell line only upon EMS treatment, RAPD and AFLP revealed alterations even when Comet assay indicated lack of significant damage. Such alterations were evident as changes in number of RAPD hybridization sites and as loss or appearance of fragments as well as changes in fragment amplification intensity in AFLP. Results of this study indicated that RAPD and AFLP are sensitive methods for detection of DNA alterations and thus encourage their use in biomonitoring programmes as well as the simultaneous use of various methods and models for revealing the consequences of genotoxic insult. O`TEENJE I PROMJENE STRUKTURE DNA ZEBRICA NAKON IZLAGANJA MODELNIM GENOTOKSIKANTIMA M. `rut1, A. `tambuk1, J.-P. Bourdineaud2, G. I.V. Klobu ar1 1Zoologijski Zavod, Prirodoslovno-matemati ki fakultet, Sveu iliate u Zagrebu, Rooseveltov trg 6, 10000 Zagreb, Hrvatska (msrut@biol.pmf.hr; astambuk@biol.pmf.hr; gklobuca@biol.pmf.hr) 2Arcachon Centar za istra~ivanje mora, CNRS, UMR EPOC 5805, Sveu iliate u Bordeaux-u, Place du Docteur Peyneau, 33120 Arcachon, Francuska (jean-paul.bourdineaud@u-bordeaux1.fr) Oateenje DNA detektirano metodama kao ato je Komet test nije uvijek pouzdani pokazatelj utjecaja genotoksi nih tvari na stabilnost genoma izlo~enih organizama. U cilju procjene oateenja DNA, njenog popravka te trajnosti oateenja koje mo~e dovesti do promjena strukture DNA uslijed genotoksi nog stresa, in vivo i in vitro model riba zebrica ӻxbL9Lb$b(hOCJH*OJQJ^JaJmH nH u%hKTCJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u+h hKTCJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u+h h CJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u+hO>*CJH*OJQJ^JaJmH nH u.h}Wh >*CJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u(hKT>*CJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u.h}WhKT>*CJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u+hYh CJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u+hYhKTCJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u  " < HJtzNPl@n@p@r@$dha$ $dha$gd# $dha$gdz $dha$gd9f $dha$gd $dha$gdg& $dha$gd     " $   $ . : ; < = yhyhyhyM4hOCJH*OJPJQJ^JaJmH nHsH tHu hOhOCJOJQJ^JaJhOCJOJQJ^JaJ h h CJOJQJ^JaJ(hOCJH*OJQJ^JaJmH nH u%hKTCJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u+h h CJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u%hOCJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u+h hKTCJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u=  2 E F G V j k  Һ碏|fPfP=%hgDCJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u+h hACJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u+hAhACJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u%hJCJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u%hACJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u/h{hzSCJOJQJ^JaJmH nH sH u/hOhOCJOJQJ^JaJmH nH sH u)hOCJOJQJ^JaJmH nH sH u/h{h CJOJQJ^JaJmH nH sH u   # + 7 B [ v hUB/%h#CJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u%hJCJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u%h)CJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u.h1hgDCJOJQJ\^JaJmH nH u+h1hgDCJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u.hClhgD6CJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u%hgDCJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u.hphgD6CJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u%h"}CJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u%hzCJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u  ( 7 ƳƇtatatNN8+hAhACJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u%hACJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u%hzCJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u%h"}CJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u+h h~CJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u+h~h~CJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u%h~CJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u%hs2CCJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u%hgDCJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u%h`GCJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u'JU`axy'./4AZa֭֚nnn[E[+hw<h~CJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u%h~CJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u+h;,hACJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u+h79hJCJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u%hJCJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u%h#CJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u+hAhACJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u+h79hACJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u%hACJOJQJ^JaJmH nH uDHLwbH.2h$f?h9f>*CJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu2h$f?h~>*CJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu(h~>*CJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u2h]h9f5CJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu/hYhCJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu/hYh~CJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu(h5CJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u%hACJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u+h&(%hACJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u  "$(*.024JLPRTVXZ\`jlprt͵tZtZttttZ2h$f?h~CJH*OJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu+h h9fCJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u/h$f?h9fCJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu%h~CJOJQJ^JaJmH nH u/h$f?h~CJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu5h$f?h~>*CJH*OJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu.h}Wh9f>*CJOJQJ^JaJmH nH utxz|.06JVZjnxzϸyhyhyhyh hOhzCJOJQJ^JaJ,h$f?hzCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHsH,h$f?h>g&CJOJQJ^JaJmHnHsH hzh>g&CJOJQJ^JaJ,h~CJH*OJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu2h]h5CJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu,h>g&5CJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu(6`bd鲛nYAY/hzhzCJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu)hzCJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu)hO#CJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu/h]hO#CJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu,h~CJH*OJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu/h$f?hCJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHuhzCJOJQJ^JaJ hOhzCJOJQJ^JaJ,h$f?hzCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHsH  ,.02BFJLNPҺҍuuuuuu]E/h hCJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu/h$f?hCJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu/hOhzCJOJQJ^JaJmH nH sH u/h$f?hzCJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu)hO#CJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu/h]hCJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu)hzCJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu/h]hzCJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHuPB4444424N4P4f44ջՉՇmUՉՉ;2h hjpCJOJQJ\^JaJmHnH sHu/hjphjpCJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu2hClhjp6CJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHuU/h hjpCJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu2h hjp6CJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu2hjphjp6CJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu)hjpCJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu)h#CJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu(Danio rerio) izlagani su benzo[a]pirenu (B[a]P) i etil metansulfonatu (EMS) 6 dana, nakon ega je uslijedio aestodnevni period oporavka. Oateenje DNA u PAC2 embrionskoj liniji zebrica i li inkama zebrica procijenjeno je pomou Komet testa. Nadalje, pomou kvantitativnog RAPD-a (random amplified polymorphic DNA) i AFLP-a (amplified fragment length polymorphism) procijenjene su trajnije promjene na DNA. Komet test pokazao je zna ajno poveanje oateenja DNA u li inkama zebrica nakon oba tretmana dok je u PAC2 stani noj liniji oateenje DNA zabilje~eno samo nakon izlaganja EMS-u.444555$5&5.5r5x555555 6v6x666X7Z7777 8Z88<r=t===F>Կԧԏԏԏԏwwbԧԏԏ`ԧԏU)hs2CCJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu/h hs2CCJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu/h hjpCJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu/hjphjpCJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu)h$f?CJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu)hjpCJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu,hjpCJOJQJ\^JaJmHnH sHu" S druge strane, RAPD i AFLP pokazali su promjene i u slu ajevima kada one Komet testom nisu zabilje~ene. Promjene su zabilje~ene kao razlike u broju RAPD hibridizacijskih mjesta te kao gubitak ili pojavljivanje pojedinih odsje aka kao i promjene u intenzitetu umno~enih odsje aka u AFLP-u. Rezultati ovog istra~ivanja ukazuju na osjetljivost metoda RAPD i AFLP za detektiranje promjena strukture DNA i sugeriraju njihovu upotrebljivost u biomonitoringu, a ujedno poti u i paralelnu upotrebu razli itih metoda i modela za otkrivanje posljedica genotoksi nog stresa. F>"??j@l@n@p@r@զv/h$f?hg&CJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu/h$f?h&(%CJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu2h$f?h#5CJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu)h4zCJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu)hjpCJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu)h'CJOJQJ^JaJmHnH sHu21h:pP. A!"#$% j 666666666vvvvvvvvv666666>6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666hH6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666662 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~ OJPJQJ_HmHnHsHtHR`RPNormal dCJ_HaJmHnHsH tH uDA D Default Paragraph FontRiR 0 Table Normal4 l4a (k ( 0No List @@o" List Paragraph ^m$RR '0 Balloon Text dCJOJQJ^JaJ^^'0Balloon Text Char#CJOJQJ^JaJmHnHsH uB'!B '0Comment ReferenceCJaJB2B '0 Comment TextdCJaJRAR'0Comment Text CharCJaJmHnHsH u@j12@ '0Comment Subject5\FBaF'0Comment Subject Char5\6Uq6 O0 Hyperlink >*B*phPK![Content_Types].xmlj0Eжr(΢Iw},-j4 wP-t#bΙ{UTU^hd}㨫)*1P' ^W0)T9<l#$yi};~@(Hu* Dנz/0ǰ $ X3aZ,D0j~3߶b~i>3\`?/[G\!-Rk.sԻ..a濭?PK!֧6 _rels/.relsj0 }Q%v/C/}(h"O = C?hv=Ʌ%[xp{۵_Pѣ<1H0ORBdJE4b$q_6LR7`0̞O,En7Lib/SeеPK!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xml M @}w7c(EbˮCAǠҟ7՛K Y, e.|,H,lxɴIsQ}#Ր ֵ+!,^$j=GW)E+& 8PK!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlYOo6w toc'vuر-MniP@I}úama[إ4:lЯGRX^6؊>$ !)O^rC$y@/yH*񄴽)޵߻UDb`}"qۋJחX^)I`nEp)liV[]1M<OP6r=zgbIguSebORD۫qu gZo~ٺlAplxpT0+[}`jzAV2Fi@qv֬5\|ʜ̭NleXdsjcs7f W+Ն7`g ȘJj|h(KD- dXiJ؇(x$( :;˹! I_TS 1?E??ZBΪmU/?~xY'y5g&΋/ɋ>GMGeD3Vq%'#q$8K)fw9:ĵ x}rxwr:\TZaG*y8IjbRc|XŻǿI u3KGnD1NIBs RuK>V.EL+M2#'fi ~V vl{u8zH *:(W☕ ~JTe\O*tHGHY}KNP*ݾ˦TѼ9/#A7qZ$*c?qUnwN%Oi4 =3ڗP 1Pm \\9Mؓ2aD];Yt\[x]}Wr|]g- eW )6-rCSj id DЇAΜIqbJ#x꺃 6k#ASh&ʌt(Q%p%m&]caSl=X\P1Mh9MVdDAaVB[݈fJíP|8 քAV^f Hn- "d>znNJ ة>b&2vKyϼD:,AGm\nziÙ.uχYC6OMf3or$5NHT[XF64T,ќM0E)`#5XY`פ;%1U٥m;R>QD DcpU'&LE/pm%]8firS4d 7y\`JnίI R3U~7+׸#m qBiDi*L69mY&iHE=(K&N!V.KeLDĕ{D vEꦚdeNƟe(MN9ߜR6&3(a/DUz<{ˊYȳV)9Z[4^n5!J?Q3eBoCM m<.vpIYfZY_p[=al-Y}Nc͙ŋ4vfavl'SA8|*u{-ߟ0%M07%<ҍPK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-![Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 +_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK]  D= tP4F>r@ !r@ L# @0(  B S  ?= I ==>> | 6O{7X^`H*o(^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.^`o(.^`.pL^p`L.@ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PL^P`L.{7|         c5\`Kp' \wJ]_tOg O#&(%Tt%V&>g&g&/,;,73{/5R7?879<$f?As2C4CgDG EOAEkvK;LZUQzSKTeT}WC?@ABCDGRoot Entry F0Ԋq*I1Table##WordDocument4DSummaryInformation(5DocumentSummaryInformation8=CompObjy  F'Microsoft Office Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q