Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 551543
Student rights and revival of immaturity: can jurisprudence account for coercion
Student rights and revival of immaturity: can jurisprudence account for coercion // 25th world congress of philosophy of law and social philosophy: law, science, technology / Neumann, Ulfried (ur.).
Frankfurt: Goethe Universitaet Frankfurt a. M., 2011. str. 302-303 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 551543 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Student rights and revival of immaturity: can jurisprudence account for coercion
(Udent rights and revival of immaturity: can jurisprudence account for coercion)
Autori
Padjen, Ivan
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Izvornik
25th world congress of philosophy of law and social philosophy: law, science, technology
/ Neumann, Ulfried - Frankfurt : Goethe Universitaet Frankfurt a. M., 2011, 302-303
Skup
25th world congress of legal and social philosophy
Mjesto i datum
Frankfurt na Majni, Njemačka, 15.08.2011. - 20.08.2011
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
student rights; maturity; coercion; jurisprudence / legal theory
Sažetak
The problem of this paper is prompted by the claim of Zagreb University students residing in government subsidized dormitories that their duty to act for free as dorm night porters amounts to forced labour. After a preliminary note on the nature and types of legal scholarship, the paper restates jurisprudential arguments against student rights and analyses limitations inherent in legal scholarship in action, or jurisprudence, that make it unresponsive to student rights: a limited normative framework and a limited subject-matter, most notably a limited focus of inquiry when it comes to force or coercion. A glimpse at an analysis of force in international law indicates that the naked force typical of elementary criminal law has dissolved long ago into phenomena remotely related to naked force, such as economic pressure and ideological propaganda. Two legal and social contexts of force are of primary interest to understanding student rights. The first is legal recognition of the vulnerability of children to naked force. The second is the blind eye of jurisprudence for the vulnerability of workers to economic need. The belief in economic necessity and subjugation of the state to capital has resulted in a bizarre reversal of the roles of corporations and students. Jurisprudence cannot change the world but can interpret it more sensibly by coming closer to the studies of politics and economics.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo
Napomena
Knjiga apstrakta nema ISBN
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
115-0151680-0765 - Pravni sistem: temeljni problemi (Padjen, Ivan, MZOS ) ( CroRIS)
Ustanove:
Pravni fakultet, Rijeka
Profili:
Ivan Padjen
(autor)