Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 529846

Entitlement to Socially-covered Health Care vs. Priority Setting: ECJ's Decomposition of the NHS?


Sokol, Tomislav
Entitlement to Socially-covered Health Care vs. Priority Setting: ECJ's Decomposition of the NHS? // European journal of social security, 13 (2011), 317-350 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 529846 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Entitlement to Socially-covered Health Care vs. Priority Setting: ECJ's Decomposition of the NHS?

Autori
Sokol, Tomislav

Izvornik
European journal of social security (1388-2627) 13 (2011); 317-350

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
entitlement ; free movement ; local commissioning ; NHS ; priority setting ; social procedural jurisprudence

Sažetak
The European Court of Justice has, in just over a decade, developed considerable jurisprudence on persons accessing health care in EU Member States in which they are not socially protected. The approach is centred on the individual patient’s entitlement to receive the best possible health care to alleviate his/her medical problem anywhere in the EU. However, this has created serious problems regarding the balance of basic principles governing the English NHS, and the free movement principle of EU law. The aim of the paper is to analyse the English case-law on entitlement to socially- covered health care and see if suggestions for a more balanced EU regime on patient mobility can be made. The analysis of the English case- law demonstrates that decisions on entitlement to health care are focused on limited resources and making priority decisions at the local level. The investigation of the Court of Justice jurisprudence shows that the Court gives priority to individual patients’ needs and entitlements, while disregarding limited resources and priority decisions. On the basis of these findings, the paper proposes a more balanced course of action by the Court of Justice, taking into account the logic of the English courts.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Pravo



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Zagrebačka škola ekonomije i managementa, Zagreb,
Hrvatsko katoličko sveučilište, Zagreb

Profili:

Avatar Url Tomislav Sokol (autor)


Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Sokol, Tomislav
Entitlement to Socially-covered Health Care vs. Priority Setting: ECJ's Decomposition of the NHS? // European journal of social security, 13 (2011), 317-350 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
Sokol, T. (2011) Entitlement to Socially-covered Health Care vs. Priority Setting: ECJ's Decomposition of the NHS?. European journal of social security, 13, 317-350.
@article{article, author = {Sokol, Tomislav}, year = {2011}, pages = {317-350}, keywords = {entitlement, free movement, local commissioning, NHS, priority setting, social procedural jurisprudence}, journal = {European journal of social security}, volume = {13}, issn = {1388-2627}, title = {Entitlement to Socially-covered Health Care vs. Priority Setting: ECJ's Decomposition of the NHS?}, keyword = {entitlement, free movement, local commissioning, NHS, priority setting, social procedural jurisprudence} }
@article{article, author = {Sokol, Tomislav}, year = {2011}, pages = {317-350}, keywords = {entitlement, free movement, local commissioning, NHS, priority setting, social procedural jurisprudence}, journal = {European journal of social security}, volume = {13}, issn = {1388-2627}, title = {Entitlement to Socially-covered Health Care vs. Priority Setting: ECJ's Decomposition of the NHS?}, keyword = {entitlement, free movement, local commissioning, NHS, priority setting, social procedural jurisprudence} }

Uključenost u ostale bibliografske baze podataka::


  • Jurisquare
  • Hein Online





Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font