Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 516685
Quality of analgesia with multi-versus two few-hole catheters in patients after colorectal surgery
Quality of analgesia with multi-versus two few-hole catheters in patients after colorectal surgery // Periodicum biologorum, 113 (2011), 2; 213-216 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 516685 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Quality of analgesia with multi-versus two few-hole catheters in patients after colorectal surgery
Autori
Marić, Stela ; Štefančić, Ljilja ; Popović, Ljiljana ; Banović, Miroslav ; Šakić, Kata
Izvornik
Periodicum biologorum (0031-5362) 113
(2011), 2;
213-216
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Regional anesthesia; Infiltration anesthesia; Pain; Colorectal surgery
Sažetak
Background and Purpose: Continuous wound infusionwith local anaesthetics is an effective method in multimodal postoperative pain therapy after colorectal surgery. The choice of optimal type of wound catheter, fewor multi-hole is still controversial. The aim is to evaluate the analgesic potential of these two catheter types. Materials and Methods: Forty patients undergoing colorectal surgery were randomized to intraoperative placement of two epidural catheters (Group EC) or multi-hole catheter (Group WC) in the wound above the fascia. Patients received 0.25% levobupivacaine (Group WC) with 10 mL bolus through the wound catheter followed by an infusion of 6 mL/h during 48 h, or the same protocol with equally divided levobupivacaine doses through two epidural catheters (Group EC). Simultaneously, patient-controlled analgesia provided intravenous morphine. Pain was evaluated postoperatively with 4-point verbal scale (VRS) for the first 2 h, with Visual Analogue Scale at rest (VAS r), and during coughing (VAS c) every 6 h for the first 48 h. Results and Conclusions: No significant difference in morphine consumption was observed between groups. There were no significant differences in VRS scores between the groups (p=0, 756). VAS scores were significantly lower in Group WC in rest (rWC, p=0, 007) and coughing (cWC, p=0, 018) for the 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h postoperatively. In the period 30–48 h there was no difference between groups. We conclude that levobupivacaine infusion through multi-hole catheter provides better quality of postoperative analgesia compared with two epidural catheters for the first 24 h.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
108-0000000-3433 - Imunosni odgovor na kirurški stres u regionalnoj i općoj anesteziji (Šakić, Kata, MZOS ) ( CroRIS)
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Zagreb,
KBC "Sestre Milosrdnice",
Medicinski fakultet, Osijek
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus