ࡱ> 7 C`bjbjUU 7|7|Ul>>>>,>&0@@@@@@@@N?G$V vvku@@@@@kQ@@QQQ@@@Q@QQV '4@@ O(-;>\G[0&^OQ UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING AND NAVAL ARCHITECTURE DEPARTMENT OF NAVAL ARCHITECTURE AND OFFSHORE ENGINEERING IVANA LU IA 5, 10000 ZAGREB , CROATIA TEL +385 1 6168 222 FAX +385 1 6156940 TECHNICAL REPORT  Title of Report : RACKING ANALYSIS OF CAR CARRIER Yard 437,438,439  Report no. : ULJ 437/1 Date : September 2000 Client / Sponsor : ULJANIK SHIPYARD Work carried out by : Dr Vedran }ani, Dipl.ing.Tomislav Jan ijev, Dipl.ing.Jerolim Andri, Dipl.ing. Darko Frank Approved by : Dr Vedran }ani TEL +385 1 6168 122 ; E-mail  HYPERLINK mailto:vedran.zanic@fsb.hr vedran.zanic@fsb.hr Dipl.ing.Tomislav Jan ijev Summary : Uljanik shipyard has contracted University of Zagreb (UZ), Faculty of Mech. Eng. and Naval Arch. to perform 3D FEM analysis of Yard 437-439 using MAESTRO software available at University of Zagreb. The coarse-mesh, full-asymmetric, global car carrier FE model was developed (Pt B,Ch 7, App 2). It simultaneously provides boundary conditions for fine mesh analysis of the crack areas on all three watertight bulkheads (Fr 51/99/147) caused by the transverse racking induced forces . Full ship 3D FEM model has 47 064 DOF and 18 462 macroelements (10164 stiffened panels and 8298 beams). Loading condition 3 (Cars on decks 1 to 11, 100% fuel and stores) was adjusted to R.I.N.A requirements for racking (Pt B, Ch 5, Sections 3-5). Pressures were calculated by R.I.N.A Rules. All masses (light ship, cars, etc.) were given corresponding accelerations based on the acceleration vector components calculated from the Rules (Pt B, Ch 5, Section 3), . Car masses were concentrated in mesh nodes of the corresponding decks. Fine mesh models for Detail Stress Analysis (DSA) using "top down approach" were developed. Boundary conditions to DSA models were automatically transferred from MAESTRO global model. Stress levels were adjusted to R.I.N.A Rules (Pt B, Ch 7, Section 4). Ship satisfies R.I.N.A racking requirements. Brackets on Fr 99. were highly stressed ( ( vonMises, max = 239 N/mm2) and adequate material quality should be assured. The bracket's free end preparation should be performed to avoid crack initiation. Key words : car carrier, finite elements, MAESTRO modeling,  CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1 2. VESSEL DESCRIPTION 2-1 3. MATHEMATICAL MODEL AND BOUNDARY CONDITIONS 3-1 4. LOADING CONDITIONS 4-1 5. RESULTS 5-1 6. CONCLUSIONS 6-1 REFERENCES APPENDIX : FIGURES FIGURE DESCRIPTION FIGURE NO. MAESTRO GLOBAL MODEL 3-D Front View of Undeformed Full Ship F.E.M Model 1 3-D Front View of Undeformed Half Ship F.E.M Model 2 3-D View of F.E.M Model , Decks 0 to11 3 3-D View of F.E.M Model Segment, Fr.47 to Fr.51 4 3-D View of F.E.M Model Segment, Fr. 95 to Fr.103 5 3-D View of F.E.M Model Segment, Fr.143 to Fr.151 6 MAESTRO DSA MODELS 3-D View of F.E.M Fine Mesh Model FR. 51 -Front View 7 3-D View of F.E.M Fine Mesh Model FR. 51 -Aft View 8 3-D View of F.E.M Fine Mesh Model FR. 99 -Front View 9 3-D View of F.E.M Fine Mesh Model FR. 99 -Aft View 10 3-D View of F.E.M Fine Mesh Model FR. 147 / Deck 1 to Deck 5 11 3-D View of F.E.M Fine Mesh Model FR. 147 /detail above Deck 2 12 3-D View of F.E.M Fine Mesh Model FR. 147 / detail bellow Deck 2 13 3-D View of F.E.M Fine Mesh Model FR. 147 / detail above Deck 3 14 3-D View of F.E.M Fine Mesh Model FR. 147 / detail bellow Deck 3 15 3-D View of F.E.M Fine Mesh Model FR. 147 / detail above Deck 4 16 3-D View of F.E.M Fine Mesh Model FR. 147 / detail bellow Deck 4 17 LOADS Equivalent Forces on Outer Plating for Ship (heeled ship to PS) - LC 1 18 Equivalent Forces on Outer Plating for Ship (heeled ship to SB) - LC 2 19 GLOBAL RESPONSE 3-D Plot of Deformed F.E.M Model for LC 1 20 3-D Plot of Deformed F.E.M Model for LC 2 21 3-D Plot of (x Stresses of Half F.E.M Model (PORT SIDE)- for LC 1 22a 3-D Plot of (x Stresses of Half F.E.M Model (STARBOARD SIDE)- for LC2 22b LOCAL RESPONSE DSA/MAESTRO-Fine Model at Fr. 51 3-D Plot of - Shear stresses for Macroelements on Bulkhead at Fr. 51 for LC 1 23a 3-D Plot of - Shear stresses for Macroelements on Bulkhead at Fr. 51 for LC2 23b 3-D View of Max.Von Mises Stresses at FR. 51-DSA Fine Model - for LC1 24a 3-D View of Max.Von Mises Stresses at FR. 51-DSA Fine Model - for LC2 24b 3-D View of Max Von Mises Stresses at FR. 51-DSA Fine Model - for LC1 25 DSA/MAESTRO-Fine Model at Fr. 99 3-D Plot of - Shear stresses for Macroelements on Bulkhead at Fr. 99 for LC 1 26a 3-D Plot of - Shear stresses for Macroelements on Bulkhead at Fr. 99 for LC 2 26b 3-D View of Max.Von Mises Stresses at FR. 99-DSA Fine Model - for LC1 27a 3-D View of Max.Von Mises Stresses at FR. 99-DSA Fine Model - for LC2 27b 3-D View of Max Von Mises Stresses at FR. 99-DSA Fine Model - for LC1 28 DSA/MAESTRO-Fine Model at Fr. 147 3-D Plot of - Shear stresses for Macroelements on Bulkhead at Fr. 147 for LC 1 29a 3-D Plot of - Shear stresses for Macroelements on Bulkhead at Fr. 147 for LC 2 29b 3-D View of Max.Von Mises Stresses at FR. 147-DSA Fine Model - for LC1 30a 3-D View of Max.Von Mises Stresses at FR. 147-DSA Fine Model - for LC2 30b 3-D View of Max Von Mises Stresses at FR. 147-DSA Fine Model -above Deck 2 for LC1 31 3-D View of Max Von Mises Stresses at FR. 147-DSA Fine Model -bellow Deck 2 forLC2 32 3-D View of Max Von Mises Stresses at FR. 147-DSA Fine Model -above Deck 3 for LC1 33 3-D View of Max Von Mises Stresses at FR. 147-DSA Fine Model - bellow Deck 3 for LC2 34 3-D View of Max Von Mises Stresses at FR. 147-DSA Fine Model -above Deck 4 for LC1 35 3-D View of Max Von Mises Stresses at FR. 147-DSA Fine Model - bellow Deck 4 for LC2 36 Yard. No. : 437, 438, 439 CAR-TRUCK CARRIER (4300 CARS) INTRODUCTION At the request of ULJANIK SHIPYARD, Pula, the University of Zagreb, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture has carried out the full ship three dimensional finite element analysis of the complete hull of yard number: 437-439 built by ULJANIK SHIPYARD. It simultaneously provides boundary conditions for fine mesh analysis of the highly stressed door areas on all three watertight bulkheads (Fr 51, 99 and 147) caused by the transverse racking induced forces. The objective of the analysis was to investigate the racking structural strength in fullfilment of requirements for direct calculation of the classification society Registro Italiano Navale. Full ship 3D FEM MAESTRO model and 3D FEM Maestro / DSA models for critical structural details were generated in accordance with relevant RINA chapters and note: Car Carrier Racking analysis according to R.I.N.A Rules 2000 supplied by the Yard/RINA This Report no.1 describes the procedures adopted in detail together with a presentation of the relevant stress and deflection results. Metric units are used throughout the report with displacement measured in millimeters (mm) and stresses in Newton/milimetre2 (N/mm2) The Report (Ref 5): RACKING ANALYSIS OF CAR CARRIER Yard 419 - 421, Report ULJ 419 /1 , Faculty of Mech. Eng. and Naval Arch.,University of Zagreb, May 2000. and documentation used in that Report were also used in this analysis, where applicable. The following additional plans and documents for Yard No.437,438,439 were supplied by ULJANIK SHIPYARD and used for the preparation of this analysis: Drawing No. Description 1 2 0 0 3 0 5 Double Bottom 1 2 0 0 3 0 6 Watertight Bulkhead 1 2 0 0 3 0 8 10th and 11th CAR DECKS 1 2 2 6 3 2 2 Platforms and Tanks in Engine Room-CROSS SECTIONS 1 2 3 4 3 0 1 RAMP WAY FROM 6th to 10th CAR DECK- (Fr.43- Fr.83) The following documentation was also supplied by ULJANIK SHIPYARD: fax of 06.09.2000 Gradnja 437 - slu ajevi krcanja (load cases) fax of 21.09.2000 Gradnja 437 - skice s izmjenama strukture (drawings with struct. modifications) 1.7 The following programs implemented at the University of Zagreb, Faculty of Mech. Eng. and Naval Architecture were used in the performing of the calculations (Refs. 2-4) : MAESTRO Version 8.0.24 , Proteus engineering, Stensville, MD, USA 2. VESSEL DESCRIPTION 2.1 The vessel is a CAR-TRUCK CARRIER 4300 CARS with the following principal dimensions : Length overall 176.70 m Length between perpendiculars 165.00 m Breadth moulded 31.10 m Depth moulded 28.00 m Draught design moulded 7.70 m Draught scantling moulded 8.75 m Deadweight at design draught 9000 t Deadweight at scantling draught 13000 t Main engine MCR (about) MAN B&W 7S50MC-C Outout 11060kW/127 r.p.m. Speed service ( 90% MCR, 15%S.M..7.70 m d) 19.5 Kn 2.2 Ship has 11 decks out of which 3 are hoistable. 2.3 The ship is longitudinally framed with the exception of some areas within the engine room and the fore and aft peak structures. 2.4 Two R.I.N.A approved material qualities were used : Steel Grade A Minimum yield stress = 240 N/mm2 Steel Grade ER36 Minimum yield stress = 360 N/mm2 3. MATHEMATICAL MODEL AND BOUNDARY CONDITIONS 3.1 Mathematical Model Description of 3D FEM MAESTRO full ship model In the view of the non-symmetrical structure and racking loads, the entire hull modeling was performed to simultaneously provide boundary conditions for fine mesh analysis of highly stressed areas. The coarse-mesh, full-asymmetric, global car carrier FE model was developed in accordance with Pt B, Ch7, App 2. Figures 1 and 2 show a full ship plot. Figures 3 to 6 show relevant structural details of the global ship model of Yard 437. The fine-mesh, FE models were developed for critical locations on three watertight bulkheads (Frames 51, 99 and 147) shown in Figs. 4 -6. MAESTRO software was used for calculation of the response of the full ship 3D FEM model. Plated areas such as decks, outer shell, bulkheads were represented by the special Q4 stiffened shell macroelements. TRIA membrane triangular elements were also applied with appropriate thickness. Each primary transverse frame or girder was modeled with special bracketed beam macroelement. Element thickness and properties were calculated from the scantlings shown on the structural plans listed in 1.5 and supplied by the Yard. Full ship 3D FEM model has 47 064 DOF and 18 462 macroelements (10164 stiffened panels and 8298 beams). Description of 3D FEM MAESTRO DSA models MAESTRO DSA (Detailed Stress Analysis) package was used for 3D fine mesh analysis of stress concentrations. Top-down approach was used based on displacements of the global mesh nodes. All nodes on the boundaries of the fine mesh have prescribed displacements calculated from displacements of the global mesh nodes. Axonometric views of fine meshs for all three bulkheads are given in Figures 7 -17. The fine mesh model for bulkhead on Fr. 51 comprised 1618 grid points and 1591 Q4 and triangle elements. Axonometric views of fine mesh for deck 5 are given in Figures 7 and 8. The fine mesh model for bulkhead on Fr. 99 comprised 1905 grid points and 1923 Q4 and triangle elements . Axonometric views of fine mesh for deck 4 are given in Figures 9 and 10. . The fine mesh model for details on bulkhead on Fr. 147 comprised 3861 grid points and 3886 Q4 and triangle elements . Axonometric views of fine meshs for all three decks 2, 3, 4) are given in Figures 11 - 17. 3.2 Axes Definition and Boundary Conditions 1. The global axes system referenced the longitudinal centerline at base as X , positive forward, Z transverse, positive to port, and Y vertical positive upwards from the base. The origin was located at frame 0 at keel. To prevent singularity of the free ship stiffness matrix, two nodes at collision bulkhead (Fr 19) at deck 4 level were restrained in the global Y and Z directions. One node in centerline at intersection of collision bulkhead (Fr 192) and deck 4 was restrained in global X, Y and Z directions. 4. LOADING CONDITIONS Two loading conditions (heel to PS and SB) for transverse strength are submitted by the Yard based on RINA requirements (Fax No 140.10.4236, 06.08.2000.). Both of these loading conditions are based on the condition No. 3 Cars A 1.1T, Departure. The differences between considered two loading conditions are heel angles and acceleration directions. Main loading condition characteristics are: draught amidships 8.02 m total trim -0.96 m metacentric height 1.57 m (corrected 1.44 m) Each loading condition comprised of four data sets : light ship mass data deadweight items acceleration data buoyancy loading including dynamic pressures Based on the model geometry and the scantlings of the elements used, a modeled mass for the hull is generated within the program. This mass distribution is corrected to achieve the light ship mass distribution from Ref. 5. Total light ship mass is 12 046 t. The masses of the hoistable decks, main engine and auxiliary engines with total mass of 1730 t are not included in the light ship mass distribution. Deadweight items supplied such as car loading, hoistable decks, water ballast, fuel oil, fresh water, stores etc are applied to the appropriate nodes and elements and each individual data set is checked for magnitude and direction. Car loading consists of masses for the following vehicles: cars, transporters and trucks. Total masses of vehicles on decks are shown in the next table. The distribution of car loading was defined by Yard (see Ref. 5). Car masses are concentrated in mesh nodes of the corresponding decks. Car masses added to hoistable decks masses are divided on the adjacent nodes according to supporting possibilities of hoistable deck supports (the side supports of the hoistable act only in the vertical direction.  DECK VEHICLESHOIST. DECK NONAMENOCAR MASSDECK MASSDECKttMASS t11UPPER DECK3251,1357,5010D105821,1640,29HOISTABLE5821,1640,25468GASTIGHT5401,1594,07HOISTABLE5401,1594,05106FREEBORD5201,1572,05HOISTABLE4531,1498,33304D43201,1352,03D32901,1319,02D22741,1301,41TANKTOP1901,1209,0 TOTAL VEHICLES / DECKS46165077,61386 The masses of water ballast, fuel oil, fresh water etc. are taken from longitudinal strength calculation for L.C. 3 submitted by Fax No 140.10.4236, 06.08.2000. These masses are generally placed in appropriate tanks, which are modeled inside the ship structure model. Contents of some smaller tanks are idealized by concentrated masses. For the two load conditions the considered total ship mass (deadweight + light ship weight) is 22090 t. Accelerations are calculated according to RINA Rules 2000, Pt. B Ch. 5 Sec. 3. sway acceleration aSW = 2.387 m/s2 rotational roll acceleration aR = 0.025 rad/s2 roll amplitude AR = 0.2365 rad rotational yaw acceleration aY = 0.03 rad/s2 heel angle ( = 0.193 rad or 11.03 degrees Combined transverse acceleration has to be defined according to 3.4.1. The combined transverse acceleration calculated by MAESTRO program is arithmetic sum of all transverse components. Because of this reason the acceleration combined by program will be bigger. To achieve the combined acceleration values defined by Rules the sway acceleration was adjusted. With the sway acceleration of 1.38 m/s2 the arithmetic summation gives the acceleration distribution which is very close to the Rule distribution. The results are shown in the following table. Vertical positionCombined transverse acceleration from 3.4.1 (m/s2)Sum of transverse acceleration components for equivalent sway acceleration (m/s2)Deck 103.7173.833Deck 93.6703.769Deck 83.6183.698Deck 73.5673.629Deck 63.5063.543Deck 53.4513.466Deck 43.4063.400Deck 33.3603.333Deck 23.3253.280Deck 13.2913.229 External sea pressure loads are calculated as specified in Pt B, Ch 5. Sec 5 for rule load case "d". The calculation model is subjected to the corrective forces which have to produce global bending defined by: the stillwater bending moment for LC 3 (hogging) MSLC3 = 1 200 970 kNm the vertical wave bending moment in hogging (0.5 L) MWVH = 793 856 kNm the total bending moment in hogging (RINA LC "d") MTOTH = 1 399 434 kNm the horizontal wave bending moment (RINA LC "d") MWHd = 213 700 kNm 5. RESULTS Yard 437 -439 5.1 Deformed plot of the complete ship is shown for loadcases 1 and 2 in Figures 20 and 21. Displacements have been magnified in order to provide a clear visual impression of the deformation behavior. Significant displacements are presented for node at : (a) Fr. 99 on deck 4 with respect to fixed nodes on Fr.19 and 192 (boundary conditions) (b) Fr 99 on deck 1, 6 and 11 at CL w.r.t. keel at CL Table 1 (a)(b)Maximal displacements (mm)Y ( w. r. t. deck 4 )Z (w.r.t. centerplane)Z (w.r.t. keel)deck 1deck 6deck 11 Loadcase 172.58-15.930.931.6-20.14 Loadcase 271.4214.25-1.05-2.8319.63 5.2 Principal areas of high stress on bulkheads are given as follows: shear stress for bulkhead at Fr.51 is given in Figs.23a and 23b for loadcase1 and 2 shear stress for bulkhead at Fr. 99 is given in Figs.26a and 26b for loadcase1 and 2 shear stress for bulkhead at Fr.147 is given in Figs.29a and 29b for loadcase1 and 2 5.3 Local von Mises equivalent stresses from MAESTRO DSA models are presented as follows: for bulkhead at Fr.51-deck 5 stresses are given in Figs. 24a and 24b. Zoomed stresses are given in Fig. 25 for loadcase 1. for bulkhead at Fr.99-deck 4 stresses are given in Figs. 27a and 27b. Zoomed stresses are given in Fig. 28 for loadcase 1. for bulkhead at Fr.147-decks 2, 3 and 4 stresses are given in Figs. 30a and 30b. Zoomed stresses are given in Figs. 31 to 36 for dominant loadcase 1. . 6. CONCLUSIONS In line with the Registro Italiano Navale requirements Pt B, Ch 5, Sec 4, the racking loadcases 1 and 2 represent approximation of the extreme conditions. All conclusions are based on the requested loadcases. The behavior of the ship's structure in terms of the global deformation is considered satisfactory from the structural aspect in both loading conditions considered. This analysis shows that Yard 437 have peak local stresses at levels given in the following table : MAXIMAL RECORDED STRESSLOCATIONTYPEVALUE N/mm2Fig.noFr.DeckPoint position 51 deck 5midpoint at free edge of bracket( von Mises200 25 99below deck 4transverse bulkhead below bracket( von Mises175 28above deck 4midpoint at free edge of bracket( von Mises239 27a 147below deck 2transverse bulkhead below bracket( von Mises147 32above deck 2midpoint at free edge of bracket( von Mises190 31below deck 3transverse bulkhead below bracket( von Mises90 34above deck 3midpoint at free edge of bracket( von Mises107 33below deck 4transverse bulkhead below bracket( von Mises96 36above deck 4midpoint at free edge of bracket( von Mises93 35 Brackets on Fr 99. were highly stressed ( ( vonMises, max = 239 N/mm2) and adequate material quality should be assured. Bracket free end preparation should be performed to avoid crack initiation. It can be concluded that Yard 437 -439 satisfies, in racking condition "d", R.I.N.A stress requirements Pt B, Ch 7, Sec 3 at all critical points according to the applied material characteristics. Peak stresses in the plating below the brackets, in the door corners, are also within R.I.N.A requirements. REFERENCES Rules of Registro Italiano Navale MAESTRO Version 8.024 , Program documentation, Proteus engineering, Stensville, MD, USA O. F. Hughes: Ship Structural Design, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1983. O.F. Hughes, F. Mistree, V.}ani : A Pratical Method for the Rational Design of Ship Structures, Journal of Ship Research, 24, 1980. V. }ani, T.Jan ijev, J.Andri, D.Frank : RACKING ANALYSIS OF CAR CARRIER Yard 419 - 421,Report ULJ 419 /1FINAL , Faculty of Mech. Eng. and Naval Arch.,University of Zagreb, May 2000. /4efg~    : < ܸ曫t jsOJQJmH sH OJQJmH sH OJQJ 5OJQJ 0JOJQJjOJQJUmHsHjOJQJUmHsH5CJOJQJmH sH 5CJOJQJmHsH5CJ$OJQJmHsH5OJQJmHsHOJQJmHsH5CJOJQJmHsHmHsH*.fhV$$Ifl      %%0      4 la$IfC`efgh0KV$$Ifl      %%0      4 la$IfV$$Ifl      %%0      4 laJ B D ($IfV$$Ifl      %%0      4 la zm(hij0( $$Ifa$$IfV$$Ifl      %% 0      4 la hij LHXkz !%%%%%нݽн||CJH*OJQJCJH*OJQJ jsCJOJQJ5CJOJQJCJ CJmH sH 5CJmH sH  CJOJQJ55>* CJOJQJ>*CJOJQJmHsH>*CJOJQJmHsHOJQJH*OJQJmH sH OJQJmH sH H*OJQJmH sH ,$a$V$$Ifl      %% 0      4 la234ghiL.i$a$$a$$ a$$a$i1o:]GHXjkz $Y^Y`a$$a$OBcf -4<C $a$$a$ !! ! !"##L$M$$$$$S%U%%%%$h^ha$$ & Fa$$ & F/a$$a$%%%%%%%%G&&& ' 'i''''',(((G))))*$ & F h7^7`a$$ & Fa$$a$% '''''(((()))))*++,,-\-0L1M11111120262I2J2x2\4]4Z77_;;==nAvAxA BCDDD.E/E@EB*OJQJhmH phsH CJOJQJmH sH B*OJQJhmH phsH B*CJOJQJhmH phsH OJQJCJH*OJQJCJH*OJQJ CJOJQJ>*CJOJQJ CJOJQJCJOJQJmHsH6****++++,,,,,,,,-\-]---".s...;/$^a$$ & Fa$$(`(a$ & F$a$;/s//0;0000000L1M1111221222I2J2x2y2@3$ & F9a$$ & F6a$$<`<a$ 7^7`$a$@3A333445555H6b6c666Y7Z77777889999::$ & F9a$$a$:Z;[;;;;*<<<<======!?"?N?O?|?? $ & FU^a$$h^ha$$ & Fa$$^a$$ & Fa$$ & Fa$$a$$ & F9a$???@@@6@H@u@v@ BBBBDDDDDDD$^a$$ & Fa$$ & F:  88^8a$$a$$ & Fa$$h^ha$$ & FU h^a$DDDDD E&E'E.E/E8E=Ef$$If4r w[NA"%           4 a $$Ifa$$If $$Ifa$ =E@EIESEXEYEZE[E\E^E`EgEd<$$If4ֈ wi[NA"%            4 a $$Ifa$ @ESEXEYEgEhEEEEEEEEEEEFF0F1FEFFFZF[FoFpFFFFFFHHHHII,I-I.I=I>ImInIIIIIIIIKKxLyLLLMNNNNJONOOOOPUʵʵʵʭ>*CJOJQJCJH*OJQJ jfOJQJH*H* CJOJQJB*OJQJhmH phsH B*OJQJhmH phsH B*CJOJQJhmH phsH DgEhEkEvEzE~EEEm|dddddd $$Ifa$$$If4ֈ wi[NA"%             4 aEEEEEEEEn\eeeeee $$Ifa$$$Ifֈ wi[NA"%             4 aEEEEEEEEEEEEn|eeeeeenleee $$Ifa$$$Ifֈ wi[NA"%       4 a EEEEEEEEEEEEe|el$$Ifֈ wi[NA"%       4 a $$Ifa$ EEFF FFFFFF"F&Fe|$$Ifֈ wi[NA"%       4 a $$Ifa$ &F,F0F1F3F6F:F>FDFEFFFHFeTeT$$Ifֈ wi[NA"%       4 a $$Ifa$ HFKFOFSFYFZF[F]F`FdFhFnFeT$$Ifֈ wi[NA"%       4 a $$Ifa$ nFoFpFrFzF~FFFFeh$$Ifֈ wi[NA"%       4 a $$Ifa$FFFFFFFnee\ee $$Ifa$ $$Ifa$$$Ifֈ wi[NA"%             4 aFFFHHHHHHI?I}IIxvxvvqvhhhh  & FX8^8 & F$^a$}$$Ifrwi[NA"              4 a IJJ/L0L1L2L3L4L5L6LHLnL{LL $$If^a$  & FY8^8LLLLLTttt $$If^a$~$$Ifl4Fd@  0    4 laLLLLLLLM M MMMMMPuuuPuuuPuuuP $$If^a$|$$IflFd@  0    4 la M&M,M2M3M:M@MFMGMNMTMZM[MbMuPuPuP|$$IflFd@  0    4 la $$If^a$ bMhMnMoMvM|MMMMMMMMuPuPus|$$IflFd@  0    4 la $$If^a$ MMMkNlNNO_OOOOOOOOOOO.PPP>QQQ $^`a$$ & F\ h88^8a$$a$$ & Fa$$^a$QQQQQQQQQQQQQpw$$If4F  0    a $$Ifa$ $$Ifa$$a$ QRRRRR RRRih` $$Ifa$$$If4\ ``` 0a $$Ifa$RR)R/R6R;R?RLC:::: $$Ifa$ $$Ifa$$$If4ֈ   0a?RFRGRSRYR_ReRE< $$Ifa$$$If4ֈ 0a $$Ifa$eRkRqRrRsRRRE@77$<^<a$$a$$$If4ֈ 0a $$Ifa$RSgSSSTTTUUUUUUUUUUU:W;WWW$ & F$a$$a$ & FQ h  ^   & Fh^h`  & F^  h  ^ UUWW%X&XnXoXXXYYDYEYYYYYZZTZUZhZZZZZZZ.[e\f\u\\\\\]]5]^F^^_ _?`@`C`ԺԮ𦠦6OJQJmHsHOJQJmHsH5OJQJmHsH 6OJQJOJQJCJCJH*OJQJmH sH CJH*OJQJmH sH  jsCJOJQJmH sH CJOJQJmH sH  jsCJOJQJ CJOJQJ CJOJQJ>*CJOJQJ/WWWWWWW $$Ifa$X$$Ifl404 la $$Ifa$WWWWWWWWnpee\eee $$Ifa$ $$Ifa$$$Ifl4\+}`R``04 laWWWWWX%XH????? $$Ifa$$$Ifl4ֈ7+}S 04 la%X1X5X6X9X:X;X6$$$Ifl4ֈ7+}S R04 la $$Ifa$ $$Ifa$;XB@> Body TextCJOJQJmHsHuBP@B Body Text 2CJOJQJmHsHuPC@P Body Text Indent7W^7`W CJOJQJ<Q@"< Body Text 3$a$ CJOJQJ(U@1( Hyperlink>*B*(OB( bullet  & FRRR@RR Body Text Indent 2$^a$ CJOJQJUPQefgh}YZ`   , - H I J j k l    P Q - f - i *rM2H(.zPCelt${2?@AB!-.CD  d !!!!!:";""""""###$$$$!$7$8$$$$%Z%%%'&s&&&M's'''''''(((((9);)i)j)))))x*y*++++P,Q,,"----&.'.....,/-///Q0S0111122223b3334444444Y6Z66666778797O7n7777E9F9.:/:&<'<(<)<*<+<,<-<.</<0<E<^<_<f<g<p<u<x<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<======== =$=*=.=/=1=:=>=B=H=I=J=L=V=Z=^=d=h=i=k=n=r=v=|=}=~=============================O?P??? @ @<@w@@@>A?AgChCiCjCkClCmCnCCCCDDDDDD"D(D.D/D6DIEILITIUIaIgInIsIwI~IIIIIIIIIIIIJJJJJPKQKKKLLLLLLLLLLLrNsNNNNNNN OOOOO,O-O.O/O0O1O4O5O?@ACDEFGHIKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`bcdefghijklmnopqrC`7AUUXPQ/4eh~89}y IVBG]dej *127y168=gkuOnoC  j k !!!!]"d"k"t"u"|"""""""""""$$0%7%x%%%%&&''F'K''''',,--Z.g.00Q2V26688u9~9d;m;;;;<*@-@d@f@@@@@'A*AEEEEDFGFFFFFFFGfGkGHHHIII$I-I2IVI^IIIK KKK?LGLLL MMMMM$MQMZMMM OOcOhOOOOO>PCPPPPP QQOQTQQQQQSSSSSSTT*TNTPTmToTTTTToUpUUUOQdh|BUXy-7vZ]%     6 ? o x  6 ? r { 3<{ V_ QUYd&1uQ\ O~B!"G"J"""####8$@$&&'''''''((())**u+z+z,,-->.E.\0g0111122 3(3n3v3'4,4666666"7*797>7O7Y7n7z777<<<< @@<@F@w@{@@@@@BCEEEEHFKFFFGeGkG HH$HHHHHHHHHIII$I4I8I>IBIEIIILIPIIIJJOJkJJJJJJQKTKKKKLNLNNNO5O9O@LNOy oq!vxHH1J1J4JHJJJJJJJJJUU.LD:\projekti\ULJANIK-Car Carrier-Yard no 419-421\izvjestaj419-421\izvgrim.doc.LD:\projekti\ULJANIK-Car Carrier-Yard no 419-421\izvjestaj419-421\izvgrim.doc.0C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\AutoRecovery save of izvgrim.wbk.0C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\AutoRecovery save of izvgrim.wbk.0C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\AutoRecovery save of izvgrim.wbk.LD:\projekti\ULJANIK-Car Carrier-Yard no 419-421\izvjestaj419-421\izvgrim.docAmorelaaE:\Noah\projekti\ULJANIK-Car Carrier-Yard no 419-421,437-439\izvjestaj419-421,437-439\izvgrim.docAmorelaKC:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of izvgrim.asdAmorelaKC:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of izvgrim.asdAmorelaKC:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of izvgrim.asd\64\l$LĦd4_^8Z5XQQ "` fa  t xOtyuV8 eU8X\l$_^ ´ F~7maS,^7bv S !}ja 7\,^y s 1  '! =!_^qB& W&  i& c, ' R' X)\l$~+j5C0_^q'1 LA3 By4Fv5>2!m6S7+: j_:}Haj ; p; $>\l$ ?ty@,ZE xI\l$( J(.]JF'6eJpwK K (NM n!N Pr4Qʽ,"8Q\l$MQ=Rf  RX?oT ;U nV V 'V[ [8zY\ y\\l$)`_xlc`vD5taxl=Ne_^X5f usg,^%j Pyk r!l_^*o(hh^h`>*o(.0^`0>*o(..0^`0>*o(... 88^8`>*o( .... 88^8`>*o( ..... `^``>*o( ...... `^``>*o(....... ^`>*o(........hh^h`o(hh^h`o(.0^`0o(..0^`0o(... 88^8`o( .... 88^8`o( ..... `^``o( ...... `^``o(....... ^`o(........hh^h`o(hh^h`o(.0^`0o(..0^`0o(... 88^8`o( .... 88^8`o( ..... `^``o( ...... `^``o(....... ^`o(........\^`\o(\^`\o(.0^`0o(..0^`0o(... 88^8`o( .... 88^8`o( ..... `^``o( ...... `^``o(....... ^`o(........^`o(. t ^ `to(.d0d^d`0o(..d0d^d`0o(... ^`o( .... ^`o( ..... 4`4^4``o( ...... 4`4^4``o(.......   ^ `o(........hh^h`.hh^h`.hh^h`o(hh^h`o(.0^`0o(..0^`0o(... 88^8`o( .... 88^8`o( ..... `^``o( ...... `^``o(....... ^`o(........hh^h`.hh^h`o(hh^h`o(.0^`0o(..0^`0o(... 88^8`o( .... 88^8`o( ..... `^``o( ...... `^``o(....... ^`o(........hh^h`o(hh^h`o(.0^`0o(..0^`0o(... 88^8`o( .... 88^8`o( ..... `^``o( ...... `^``o(....... ^`o(........ hh^h`OJQJo( hh^h`OJQJo(hh^h`.hh^h`.P^`P..^`...x^`x....  ^` .....  X@ ^ `X ......  ^ `....... 8x^`8........ `H^``.........hh^h`.hh^h`o(.XX^X`o(XX^X`o(.0^`0o(..0^`0o(... 88^8`o( .... 88^8`o( ..... `^``o( ...... `^``o(....... ^`o(........hh^h`o(hh^h`o(.0^`0o(..0^`0o(... 88^8`o( .... 88^8`o( ..... `^``o( ...... `^``o(....... ^`o(........ hh^h`OJQJo(hh^h`.P^`P..^`...x^`x....  ^` .....  X@ ^ `X ......  ^ `....... 8x^`8........ `H^``......... hh^h`OJQJo(hh^h`o(\r!l7+:faxI$>ZER'n!NaKrX64X) nVQQ!m6 ?c`wt7b1 m.]Jusg?oT(NM~Y\X5fwKKqB&"8Qy\5taW&p;"`[Pvq'15C0+m=Ne i&=B=H=I=J=L=V=Z=^=d=h=i=k=n=r=v=|=}=~============================mCnCCCDDDDDD"D(D.D/D6DIEILITIUIaIgInIsIwI~IIIIIIIIIsNNNNNNN OOOOO,O-O.O/O0O4O?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrsuvwxyz{}~     Root Entry F(-Data t1Table|WordDocumentSummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjjObjectPool(-(-  FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q