Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 506514

Comparison between non-linear dynamic and static seismic analysis of structures according to European and US provisions


Čaušević, Mehmed; Mitrović, Saša
Comparison between non-linear dynamic and static seismic analysis of structures according to European and US provisions // Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 9 (2011), 2; 467-489 doi:10.1007/s10518-010-9199-1 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 506514 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Comparison between non-linear dynamic and static seismic analysis of structures according to European and US provisions

Autori
Čaušević, Mehmed ; Mitrović, Saša

Izvornik
Bulletin of earthquake engineering (1570-761X) 9 (2011), 2; 467-489

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
non-linear dynamic analysis; non-linear static methods; pushover analysis; N2; NSP and CSM methods

Sažetak
Several procedures for non-linear static and dynamic analysis of structures have been developed in recent years. This paper discusses those procedures that have been implemented into the latest European and US seismic provisions: non-linear dynamic time-history analysis ; N2 non-linear static method (Eurocode 8) ; non-linear static procedure NSP (FEMA 356) and improved capacity spectrum method CSM (FEMA 440). The presented methods differ in respect to accuracy, simplicity, transparency and clarity of theoretical background. Non-linear static procedures were developed with the aim of overcoming the insufficiency and limitations of linear methods, whilst at the same time maintaining a relatively simple application. All procedures incorporate performance-based concepts paying more attention to damage control. Application of the presented procedures is illustrated by means of an example of an eight-storey reinforced concrete frame building. The results obtained by non-linear dynamic time-history analysis and non-linear static procedures are compared. It is concluded that these non-linear static procedures are sustainable for application. Additionally, this paper discusses a recommendation in the Eurocode 8/1 that the capacity curve should be determined by pushover analysis for values of the control displacement ranging between zero and 150% of the target displacement. Maximum top displacement of the analyzed structure obtained by using dynamic method with real time-history records corresponds to 145% of the target displacement obtained using the non-linear static N2 procedure.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Geologija, Arhitektura i urbanizam, Građevinarstvo



POVEZANOST RADA


Projekti:
114-0821466-1470 - Razvoj konstrukcija povećane pouzdanosti obzirom na potrese (Čaušević, Mehmed, MZOS ) ( CroRIS)

Ustanove:
Građevinski fakultet, Rijeka

Profili:

Avatar Url Saša Mitrović (autor)

Avatar Url Mehmed Čaušević (autor)

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

Pristup cjelovitom tekstu rada doi link.springer.com

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Čaušević, Mehmed; Mitrović, Saša
Comparison between non-linear dynamic and static seismic analysis of structures according to European and US provisions // Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 9 (2011), 2; 467-489 doi:10.1007/s10518-010-9199-1 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
Čaušević, M. & Mitrović, S. (2011) Comparison between non-linear dynamic and static seismic analysis of structures according to European and US provisions. Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 9 (2), 467-489 doi:10.1007/s10518-010-9199-1.
@article{article, author = {\v{C}au\v{s}evi\'{c}, Mehmed and Mitrovi\'{c}, Sa\v{s}a}, year = {2011}, pages = {467-489}, DOI = {10.1007/s10518-010-9199-1}, keywords = {non-linear dynamic analysis, non-linear static methods, pushover analysis, N2, NSP and CSM methods}, journal = {Bulletin of earthquake engineering}, doi = {10.1007/s10518-010-9199-1}, volume = {9}, number = {2}, issn = {1570-761X}, title = {Comparison between non-linear dynamic and static seismic analysis of structures according to European and US provisions}, keyword = {non-linear dynamic analysis, non-linear static methods, pushover analysis, N2, NSP and CSM methods} }
@article{article, author = {\v{C}au\v{s}evi\'{c}, Mehmed and Mitrovi\'{c}, Sa\v{s}a}, year = {2011}, pages = {467-489}, DOI = {10.1007/s10518-010-9199-1}, keywords = {non-linear dynamic analysis, non-linear static methods, pushover analysis, N2, NSP and CSM methods}, journal = {Bulletin of earthquake engineering}, doi = {10.1007/s10518-010-9199-1}, volume = {9}, number = {2}, issn = {1570-761X}, title = {Comparison between non-linear dynamic and static seismic analysis of structures according to European and US provisions}, keyword = {non-linear dynamic analysis, non-linear static methods, pushover analysis, N2, NSP and CSM methods} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Current Contents Connect (CCC)
  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
    • SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
  • Scopus


Citati:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font