Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 437787
The Analgesic Efficacy of Two Anesthetic Techniques During Arthroscopic Knee Surgery
The Analgesic Efficacy of Two Anesthetic Techniques During Arthroscopic Knee Surgery // Abstract of the XXVIII Annual ESRA Congres of Europen Sociaty of Regional Anaesthesia & Pain ; u: Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 34 (2009) (5)(S1) ; 1-398
Salzburg, Austrija, 2009. str. 57-57 (poster, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 437787 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
The Analgesic Efficacy of Two Anesthetic Techniques During Arthroscopic Knee Surgery
Autori
Maldini, Branka ; Goranović, Tanja ; Šakić, Katarina ; Miškulin, Mladen
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Izvornik
Abstract of the XXVIII Annual ESRA Congres of Europen Sociaty of Regional Anaesthesia & Pain ; u: Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 34 (2009) (5)(S1) ; 1-398
/ - , 2009, 57-57
Skup
Annual ESRA Congress (28 ; 2009)
Mjesto i datum
Salzburg, Austrija, 09.09.2009. - 12.09.2009
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Poster
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
local anaesthetics; spinal anaesthesia
Sažetak
Background and aims: The aim of study was to compare safety and complication of two anaesthetic techniques including local and spinal anesthesia for patients underground arthroscopic knee surgery. Methods: 436 patients received either local (Group LA=250) or spinal (Group SA=186) anesthesia during a year period. Group SA received 0, 5 % Marcaine 5 mg/mL. Group LA received portal injection (5 mL lidocaine 2% with adrenaline 1/200, 000) and intra-articular into the knee (10 mL lidocaine 2% with adrenaline 1/200, 000). The following were assessed: intraoperative pain (10 cm VAS: 0 = no pain, 10 = extreme pain), time to discharge, and postoperative analgesia. Results: In both groups 93, 6% of patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with their anesthesia. In LA group 97, 6% (244/250) patients experienced no pain during the whole procedure. Only six 6 patients (2, 4%) required conversion to general anesthesia. In SA group two patients required conversion to general anesthesia. More SA patients needed postoperative analgesics compared with the LA group (P< 0, 01). The average postoperative stay for LA group was significantly shorter (P< 0, 05) than SA group. Of the patients having LA 94% were discharged from the hospital within 2 hours of surgery (P< 0, 001). The differences in number of complications between LA and SA were statistically significant (P< 0, 05). Conclusions: We found LA favourable to SA anesthetic technique, a large variety of operative procedures were successfully completed.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
108-0000000-3433 - Imunosni odgovor na kirurški stres u regionalnoj i općoj anesteziji (Šakić, Kata, MZOS ) ( CroRIS)
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Zagreb
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE