Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 43549

How to interpret results of on-line risk monitoring?


Šimić, Zdenko; Mikuličić, Vladimir; Vrbanić, Ivan
How to interpret results of on-line risk monitoring? // Proceedings of the International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (Vol.2)
Osaka, 2000. str. 1125-1130 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 43549 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
How to interpret results of on-line risk monitoring?

Autori
Šimić, Zdenko ; Mikuličić, Vladimir ; Vrbanić, Ivan

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni

Izvornik
Proceedings of the International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (Vol.2) / - Osaka, 2000, 1125-1130

Skup
PSAM5 - International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management

Mjesto i datum
Osaka, Japan, 27.11.2000. - 01.12.2000

Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje

Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija

Ključne riječi
probabilistic safety assessment; PSA

Sažetak
This paper is presenting empirical comparison between Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) results for the so-called average model and for the realistic model. From the one side average PRA model is regularly used model which is modeling average behavior of the all-modeling parameters during one-year period. On the other side realistic PRA model is considering various plant configurations and other important conditions that are changing during one-year period. Results are obtained for the specific modeling segment related to the plant safety power supply. Diesel generators are regularly maintained during the year, and probability for initiating event loss of offsite power (LOOP) is changing depending on the power grid state and weather conditions. Influences of these two facts are quantified and result presented. Two different PRA models with two different resolutions were used. Both results are showing that even for the worst scenario (DG is maintained during the highest LOOP likelihood) averaged result from realistic model is smaller than result obtained by average model. Results are also showing that extreme instantaneous values are easily avoidable which also reduces cumulative probability.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Elektrotehnika



POVEZANOST RADA


Projekti:
036010

Ustanove:
Fakultet elektrotehnike i računarstva, Zagreb

Profili:

Avatar Url Vladimir Mikuličić (autor)

Avatar Url Zdenko Šimić (autor)

Avatar Url Ivan Vrbanić (autor)


Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Šimić, Zdenko; Mikuličić, Vladimir; Vrbanić, Ivan
How to interpret results of on-line risk monitoring? // Proceedings of the International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (Vol.2)
Osaka, 2000. str. 1125-1130 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
Šimić, Z., Mikuličić, V. & Vrbanić, I. (2000) How to interpret results of on-line risk monitoring?. U: Proceedings of the International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (Vol.2).
@article{article, author = {\v{S}imi\'{c}, Zdenko and Mikuli\v{c}i\'{c}, Vladimir and Vrbani\'{c}, Ivan}, year = {2000}, pages = {1125-1130}, keywords = {probabilistic safety assessment, PSA}, title = {How to interpret results of on-line risk monitoring?}, keyword = {probabilistic safety assessment, PSA}, publisherplace = {Osaka, Japan} }
@article{article, author = {\v{S}imi\'{c}, Zdenko and Mikuli\v{c}i\'{c}, Vladimir and Vrbani\'{c}, Ivan}, year = {2000}, pages = {1125-1130}, keywords = {probabilistic safety assessment, PSA}, title = {How to interpret results of on-line risk monitoring?}, keyword = {probabilistic safety assessment, PSA}, publisherplace = {Osaka, Japan} }




Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font