ࡱ> q`bjbjqPqP 8::^%"""8Z>F2pN"pppKY eEEEEEEE$GhUJ Fi"KK"" FppuF,,,"ppE,"E,,=>p Buc"'Z>C F0Fn>J+J(>>8J&?m,mmm F F,XmmmF""""d~~ MEMETICS IN TEAM-BUILDING EDUCATION Ljubica Baki-Tomi, Ph.D.; Faculty of Teacher Education, University of Zagreb Vesna Markovac ; Faculty of Teacher Education, University of Zagreb Sanja `iki; Faculty of Teacher Education, University of Zagreb Abstract Contemporary knowledge societies educators and team-builders are obliged to meet the needs of diverse groups of learners and team members through individual approaches, bridging cultural value gaps and solving complex social dynamics problems through integrating various knowledge domains. Upon the foundations of Graves spiral dynamics theory, where human development is perceived as an open-ended process leading towards systems of increasing complexity, the authors explore a variety of human value systems transferred via memes that make up the vMEMEs or deep-level value systems. In the paper the evolving and manifold vMEMEs are seen as factors that both enrich human societies as well as cause conflicts, and the human struggle is seen as taking place among the memes within and among persons. In order to come up with practical guidelines for educators and team-builders who need to evolve as multimemetic professionals able to manage conflicts by way of stepping beyond limited human mental models, the authors suggest the paradigm of spiral educators/leaders of comprehensive outlook, who base their authority on functionality and mutuality, value ambiguities, underscoring the importance of spiritual intelligence in the process of bringing about transformation of individuals and societies. Introduction The knowledge society paradigm promotes integrated understanding of multidimensional fabric of knowledge, consisting of knowing about, knowing to do, knowing to be, knowing where, and knowing to transform (Siemens, 2006). In this article we explore approaches to teaching, learning and collaborative work at large, which include physical, cognitive, emotional and spiritual domains of knowing, bridge gaps among value systems and bring about agents transformation through collaboration and team work. For more than three thousand million years, DNA has been the only replicator worth talking about. However, a concept similar to genes, that would show the same replicating influence culturally, was introduced by the term meme, which derives from the Greek word mimeme, imitation. Memes were originally described by Richard Dawkins as the new replicators, in his book The Selfish Gene (1976). What makes the meme perspective so intriguing is that it suggests that the knowledge we have of biology can be applied to human psychology. Since memes can be passed between any two individuals, not just between parent and offspring, a meme can spread to a complete cultural group, using the human mind as a host. Memes are most often described as cultural units of information, viruses of the mind, cultural DNA that self-replicate by means of thought-contagion. They are being passed on to us in altered form, therefore, their transmission is subject to continuous mutation as well as to blending. They take the form of simple concepts as well as complicated social movements. Memetic science goes so far to define human consciousness as a product of memes and therefore is hard to imagine that nature and origin of human mind can be understood without an efficient memetic theory. There is no uncertainty that memes are replicators and therefore is understandable they aspire to increase quantity whenever possible. Thus, all the facts set forth lead to a conclusion that memetic evolution, which will be by far faster and more efficient than genetic evolution, is inevitable. It should not surprise us then that during the last ten thousand years, humans have basically not changed on the genetic level, whereas their culture (i.e. the total set of memes) has undergone the most radical developments. The spiral dynamics of human development Memetic theory is somewhat related to Maslow's theory of human needs. The fundamental difference between them is that Maslow views the hierarchy of needs in a rather static way. The questions related to the top of the hierarchy of needs diagram is what happens after one reaches the final destination of self-actualization (defined as personal growth and fulfilment), and is it possible to reach the destination. On the other hand, Dr. Clare Graves claims there is no final destination and the quest is never ending. He introduced a theory important for understanding problems in education and society in general, called The theory of Levels of Human Existence (1971), which he summarized in this manner: Briefly, what I am proposing is that the psychology of the mature human being is an unfolding, emergent, oscillating spiralling process. Human development is an open-ended process, with no end in sight but capable of continual growth. At each stage of human existence the adult man is off on his quest of his holy grail, the way of life he seeks by which to live. People and nations, however, do not automatically move up the spiral from one level to the next. It is an ever increasing and widening spiral of development as people move through the various levels of bio-psycho-social complexity. Often people and societies can remain at one level of development their whole existence, and even achieve "self-actualization" at that level. Graves called these levels deep-level Value Systems, or what his students, Don E. Beck and Christopher C. Cowan, termed as vMEMEs, the little "v" standing for "values" or "value-MEMEs" (pronounced "vee-meems"). The term vMeme was first used in their book Spiral Dynamics: Mastering Values, Leadership, and Change (1996), which summarized the essence of Graves' research and theory. Consequently, Graves' theory is now called Spiral Dynamics, since a spiral vortex best depicts this emergence of human systems as they evolve through levels of increasing complexity. In that context, the Spiral is a continuum, not only a staircase with eight colourful steps, in which warm colours are used to refer to cultures focused on the individual while cool colours, alternating with the warm, refer to cultures focused on the collective. Their significance is only to identify the systems and has no symbolism beyond that. Value Systems or vMEMEs can be compared to magnetic fields that attract or repel surface values or little memes-ideas, beliefs, behaviours that may or may not be compatible with one's basic value system. vMEMEs are systems in people, ways of thinking that determined human behaviour, but not types of people or fixed categories. Human nature changes as the conditions of existence change and so includes a capacity for new vMEMES to awaken without eliminating old ones. In that process new value systems are being created while the older ones stay with us. When a new system or level is activated, we change our psychology and rules for living to adapt to those new conditions. What moves someone from one level to the next is when old explanations and experiences no longer adequately explain one's reality as a result of changes in one's life conditions. It is important to emphasise that person can be at more than one memetic level in different areas of their life, even though one value system dominates their outlook. In other words, vMEMES coexist as mixtures. As C. Rosado neatly explains it: ...while their overarching vMEME may be a conservative Blue, especially in terms of family values and the school, in relation to their family they may be Purple (tradition-driven), at work they may be Orange (success-driven), in sports they may be Red (power-driven), and in relation to others they may be Green (people-driven), but their basic paradigm and way of seeing the world is still Blue (order-driven). Key points of Spiral Dynamics reminds us that human nature is not static or finite. As we live in a potentially open system of values with an infinite number of living modes available to us, there is no final state towards which we must all aspire. It is here where Graves differed with  HYPERLINK "http://www.12manage.com/methods_maslow_hierarchy_needs.html" Maslow and most other psychologists. Before his death, Maslow told Graves that he was wrong in thinking of human development as a closed state. Therefore, there is no dilemma on how to perceive human development. The levels are open-ended, there is no final stage of development. Perhaps, the final goal can be perceived asymptotically approaching to it but never fully reaching it, only strive to be as close as possible, until new paths of growth arise. Applicability of Spiral Dynamics in education The new millennium brings new challenges in every aspect of human lives and so education is not deprived from it either. According to that notion, it is necessary to ask this question: What kind of leaders are needed now to address this exuberance of pressing issues and diverse value systems? In the book  Paradox of education , eminent Croatian pedagogue Marija Bratani writes that everything we implement through a school curriculum is in opposition with the child nature. The child is open, creative, dynamic and the educational system used to stereotype people and was detainable in their growth. The theory of Dr. Graves will be here applied to align educational systems along an evolving spiral of human development which pulls from an interdisciplinary approach to learning, a bio-psycho-social framework. A grasp of Spiral Dynamics also enables teachers to recognize the diversity of learning styles and thus the different approaches to teaching. The challenges confronting education stem in part from the fact that administrators, faculty, staff, students, parents, and communities are at different levels of existence with conflicting and clashing Value Systems. Edwin A. Abbott, in his fictional classic, Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions (1884), describes "Flatlanders" as people unable to recognize the vertical, spiral structure of human development. Rather, they focus on superficial, horizontal differences and rigid categories. The result is a Flatlander perspective, a one-size-fits-all approach, inherent for much of education today. Failure to recognize this vertical dimension of education, the memetic spiral of human development, results in surface conflicts and a concern with solutions that are at best superficial for they do not get to root of the problem, the deep-level decision systems within. These operative vMEMEs guide all people's thinking and action. Depending on their operative Value System different students respond to learning in different ways, and the spiral educator will recognize this and employ different methods of instruction suitable to the different learning styles at the level of existence of the student. Spiral Dynamics offers a way of dealing with the deeper Value Systems that create and sustain these conflicting identities and development gaps in the curriculum. It does not replace traditional diversity training, it only goes beyond it. When teachers and students are at different levels of existence the result is that everyone sees Red and so the conflict protrudes. Solutions to the current problems our schools are experiencing cannot come from the same level of existence and operation where the problem is located. It means that the same way of thinking that created the problems we are experiencing cannot be the same way of thinking that solves those problems - today's problems are tomorrows solutions. The solution must come from above, from the higher level of development. To attain a more comprehensive level and penetrate beyond the limited human mental models, logic alone is inadequate. Hence, OConnor and McDermott suggest a new way of thinking beyond logic, which includes combining of objective and subjective perspectives, circuitous thought, generative learning, mapping, reinforcing feedback etc. Surely, we do not need "flatlanders" who approaches decision-making with a one-dimensional practice. We also do not need teachers who are reserved, ones who operates only on the basis of one Value System and are unwilling to explore options other than those that conform to their own. A Spiral Leader is a person who is able to see the whole picture, the whole spiral of human differences and knows how to deal with the psychology of people at their respective levels of existence. We can ask the basic question - What is education? What we know now is that it is not information but transformation of individuals. Therefore, depending on their operative Value System different students respond to learning in different ways, and the Spiral Educator as a multimemetic person will recognize this and employ different methods of instruction suitable to the different learning styles at the students' level of existence. As C. Rosado points out: Understanding where people are coming from and why is of a greater value to conflict resolution than what they simply say or do. The key question for educators is: "What kind of thinking prompted that kind of behaviour?" not just the behaviour itself. Thus, our struggle is not with human types, but with the memes within us that are at war. Implications of memetics in team building In the following paragraphs we shall apply the principles of spiral development and memetics set forth above, to team-building, particularly in educational sector, considering the importance of collaborative activities in innovative educational approaches. We shall look into desirable features of education professionals that support sustainable learning communities. What needs to be brought to awareness is our role and place within the team as well as the vision and the mission of the team. Every team should answer certain questions, for example how can each member help in the missions and what will he gain in return. After those questions are answered, they need to be analyzed. What is important to discover is which memes are most frequently used and do those memes lead to progress or stagnation. That is the significance of memes in team education to help bring to awareness what role to assume, which path of development to take, how to find best methods and technique for improvement. What is important to bear in mind is the fact that people who potentially constitute a team are at various memetic levels. Therefore, what each future team member has in mind in terms of what constitutes a team may be entirely different thing, depending on their operational Value System. Fortunately, most people tend to gravitate to those types of organizations that reflect their own operational Value System. This is because we as humans are naturally drawn to work environments, relationships, lifestyles, behaviour patterns, belief systems, worldviews, leadership styles, etc., which resonate with our dominant Value System, thereby enabling us to experience a comfort zone that gives us a sense of being at home. vMEMESCOLORFOCUSTEAMSBASIS OF AUTHORITYEXAMPLELevel 7YellowSelfConnotativeFunctionality, mutualityDoctors Without BordersLevel 6GreenGroupSociocentricEquality of every person, consensus buildingProfessional associations, faculty councilsLevel 5OrangeSelfStrategicAppointed, but can be manipulated through competitionGolf, entrepreneurshipsLevel 4BlueGroupDenotativeTop-down, legitimate authority, one-right-way, by the bookFootball team, many K-12 schools, conservative churchesLevel 3RedSelfGangPower, prowess, fear, coercionUrban gangs, demagogues, power-grabbing leadersLevel 2PurpleGroupClanDivine authority, based on tradition, little autonomy among teamAmish, Roman Catholic ChurchLevel 1BeigeSelfBandNeed for survivalHomeless, survival bands Table 1: Spiral dynamics and team building, by Beck, D.E. and C. Cowan, in Rosado (2004b) When referring to Spiral Dynamics, the practice of team building basically emerges from a Green value system which implies equality, justice, group harmony and community building. Since Green leaders value such an approach, they tend to think that it is indeed the best one when it comes to working with a team and decision-making. However, what constitutes a team very much differs, as do the basis of authority, all depending on the existing memetic level. Referring to Table 1, we shall describe the team management approaches appropriate for different vMEMEs. Here we shall describe those management styles (colours) that are conducive to team-building, omitting those that are not. The first level that values team building is Blue, at least it appears so on the surface. Beneath that surface Blue shows that what they value are actually set of commands based on legitimate authority. The "team" is lead by an authoritative leader who bases authority on interpreted guiding principles and procedures. Members know their place in the plan. People are given an opportunity to express themselves and give their opinions, however, at the end of the day, what matters is not what they think, but what the appointed person in authority says. Examples: football teams, hierarchical corporations, conservative churches, most K-12 schools. Orange is success-oriented, competition-based, with a self interest-oriented attitude. Teams are strategic and competitive, not just inter but also intra. The leader sets goals for the team and is confident they can reach goals with light supervision. It is very important for the team to compete and win, however the leader may or may not share credit with the team. The focus is on individual achievement. There is little in such a system to foster collaboration, dialogue or respect. Examples: entrepreneurial dot.coms, independent ministries. Green is the comfortable home of team building. Because Green regards every opinion of equal value, it is concerned with giving every voice an opportunity of being heard. Green opposes authoritative Blue "team" framework, or stingy, unsharing Orange teams. Green teams, however, dont have much tolerance for colleagues that do not value an egalitarian perspective, everyone playing by the same rules, nor those who do not appreciate the value of teams. Green is the archetypal flatlander pushing a monomemetic worldview, and can thus be rather exclusive of others who are not inclusive. It values harmony and equity above everything else. Examples: Professional associations (lawyers and medical groups), faculty councils, ministerial groups. Yellow represents the purest Value System of team building. Yellow values ambiguities, meaning different contexts which require different solutions. All members of the team see big picture and creative, original solutions to problems are welcome. Leadership of team is passed around to the most appropriate person for the task at hand according to their ability and all team members can follow or lead, as needed. In an unusual turn of events, Yellow with its multimemetic thinking system can perceive which "team style is needed in a particular circumstance outside Yellow. Yellow recognizes the value and contribution of each level and knows when and how to intervene. This is because the concern of Yellow is with the health of the entire spiral. Its authority is based on functionality and mutuality, with a high tolerance for ambiguity. Individualism that safeguards the well being of the entire spiral is the essence of Yellow. Example: Doctors Without Borders. (Rosado, 2004) With all the advantages that team has to offer, there are some drawbacks as well. One of them is the fact that not everyone contributes to the worthwhile cause of the group. Teams can sometimes hide a free rider. These are people that want all the advantages and privileges of belonging, without doing any of the work. And because Green values the person (as opposed to Blue that values the system and Orange that values the self), it respects peoples choice not to contribute, giving rise to the free rider. Thus, team building for some is a positive approach to leadership. For others it is the worst and most inefficient way of getting things done. Those people are mostly so called flatlanders who do not understand the vertical dimension of team building, since they operate exclusively from a horizontal perspective. The result is a monomemetic approach to leadership and management, where the person is focused on one memetic level, usually their own, and believes that effective leadership is one where all persons are treated the same. Thus the need for spiral leaders and spiral educators who are multimemetic is unquestionable. Finally, what a good leader should also possess in the years ahead is a highly developed spiritual intelligence (SQ). Spiritual intelligence is defined by Zohar and Marshall (2004) as the intelligence with which we address and solve problems of meaning and value, the intelligence with which we can place our actions and our lives in a wider, richer, meaning-giving context, the intelligence with which we can assess that one course of action or one life-path is more meaningful than another. That type of intelligence is essential in todays world of lost values and beliefs. The society is spiritually underdeveloped and that might be the only way for the leader to inspire others, the team members. Self-actualization, the very goal of human development, as well as of everything mentioned above, is unthinkable without having spiritual intelligence fully developed. Conclusions In order to grasp the interconnectivity of knowledge in a world of increasingly dynamic complexity, educational experts and practitioners need to develop individual approaches to learners as well as promote collaborative team work methods. With the help of multimemetic, spiral dynamics thinking perspectives, it is possible to strive towards designing innovative learning and teaching approaches, integrating spiritual intelligence and achieving excellence in educational outcomes both at the level of the individual as well as that of the society. References: Beck, D.E. & Cowan, C. (2005); Spiral Dynamics: Mastering Values, Leadership and Change; Blackwell Publishing Limited (pp. 352) Bjarneskans, H.; B. GrYnnevik & A. Sandberg (2000) The Lifecycle of Memes;  HYPERLINK "http://www.aleph.se/Trans/Cultural/Memetics/memecycle.html" http://www.aleph.se/Trans/Cultural/Memetics/memecycle.html; Accessed on: April 25, 2007 Blackmore, S. (2005); The Meme Machine; Oxford University Press (pp. 288) Bratanic, M. (2002); Paradoksi odgoja; Hrvatska sveu iliana naklada (pp. 247 ) Dawkins, R. (1989); The Selfish Gene; Oxford University Press (pp. 384) Graves C. (1966); Theory of Levels of Human Existence;  HYPERLINK "http://www.12manage.com/methods_graves_spiral_dynamics.html" http://www.12manage.com/methods_graves_spiral_dynamics.html; Accessed on: June 10, 2007 Heylighen, F. (1998); What makes a meme successful?: Selection criteria for cultural evolution; CLEA, Free University of Brussels,  HYPERLINK "http://cleamc11.vub.ac.be/Papers/Memetics-Namur.pdf" http://cleamc11.vub.ac.be/Papers/Memetics-Namur.pdf Accessed on: April 17, 2007 Maslow, A. (1987); Motivation and Personality; Hierarchy&LN    ( 1 B C   & ' ( ^ _ P A K v xphhph`hm mH sH h@56mH sH hmH sH hmH sH h,mH sH hNLmH sH hUmH sH hjmH sH hMh!Q5mH sH hkh!QmH sH h2 5mH sH hkh!Q5mH sH hkh;d5CJ aJ mH sH " *hUh{5CJ aJ mH sH " *hUh;d5CJ aJ mH sH #NPv   .%.W!" $xa$gdR;$a$gd$ & Fx^`a$gd!Q $a$gd2 $a$gd & Fx^`gdD$a$gdr+xgdeWxgd2 gd!Q$a$gd[Xv LM #$.MU#$%ȸȣ|gR=(h2 hv>CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH (h2 hVdCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH (hFOzhFOzCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH "hFOzCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH (hjf`hjf`CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH (hjf`hFOzCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH hjf`hW5CJaJmH sH hjf`hRa65CJaJmH sH h@56mH sH h{PmH sH hm mH sH hmH sH hMmH sH 4==mn ֓֓~i~~TTIhkhVdmH sH (h2 h+CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH (h2 hFSCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH (h2 huCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH .h2 hVd6CJOJQJ]^JaJmH sH +h2 hv>6CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH (h2 hv>CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH (h2 hVdCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH (h2 hBCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH  9X%<e 齧{fQf;+h2 hBkxCJOJQJ\^JaJmH sH (h2 h\QNCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH (h2 hx$CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH +h2 h\QNCJOJQJ\^JaJmH sH +h2 hzCJOJQJ\^JaJmH sH +h2 hFSCJOJQJ\^JaJmH sH +h2 hO@)CJOJQJ\^JaJmH sH +h2 hCJOJQJ\^JaJmH sH +h2 h#CJOJQJ\^JaJmH sH  =>LM-.VWiwy|տ땅uj_WjLAW6W6hkhT mH sH hkhWmH sH hkhv>mH sH h{mH sH hkhmH sH hkh?QmH sH h}h;d5CJaJmH sH h}hP5CJaJmH sH (h2 h;dCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH (h2 h+CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH +h2 hCJOJQJ\^JaJmH sH +h2 hBkxCJOJQJ\^JaJmH sH (h2 hBkxCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH   %-EKNOPbn =A[]_ǼǼǼ屦yhkh%mH sH hkh%6mH sH hkhw6lmH sH hkh\QNmH sH hkhi\mH sH hkhImH sH hkhT mH sH h}mH sH hkh{mH sH hkhjmH sH h{mH sH hDmH sH hkha7 mH sH -01mx~5ɾɾɾzocoocXLhkh76mH sH hkh7mH sH hkhH6mH sH hkhHmH sH hkhw6lB*mH phsH hkhBB*mH phsH hkh%0RmH sH hkh#mH sH hDmH sH hFSmH sH hkh nOmH sH hkhw6lmH sH h.hw6lmH sH h.h\QNmH sH h.6mH sH hkhw6l6mH sH 5z{1 2 @ A J b x ~ 7!9!;!!!""9"X"Z"`"o"īiZOOOhkh nOmH sH hkh\QNB*mH phsH 1hkhw6lB*CJOJQJ^JaJmH phsH hkh'mH sH hkhHmH sH hFSmH sH hkhw6lmH sH 1hkh},B*CJOJQJ^JaJmH phsH hkh},B*mH phsH hkh},mH sH hkh76mH sH hkh/mH sH hkh7mH sH o"""""""""###%#d#y####5$@$D$$$$$%%̽ti^OhkhHB*mH phsH hkhHmH sH hkh'mH sH hkh4mH sH hkh(omH sH hkhmH sH 1hkh%i>B*CJOJQJ^JaJmH phsH hkh%i>B*mH phsH hkhB*mH phsH hkhXzkmH sH hkhBmH sH hkh7mH sH hFSmH sH hkh4mH sH %%%Y'y'z'''''q(s(((((((( ))")6)u)))))))*ȹyyynncXcXcMhkhi\mH sH hkhgmH sH hkh,mH sH hkh(omH sH jhkhUmH sH hkh5mH sH hkhmH sH hkh'mH sH hkhw6lB*mH phsH hkh'B*mH phsH hw6lmH sH hkhHmH sH hkhOQmH sH 1hkhHB*CJOJQJ^JaJmH phsH "z'***:.:===_?ADDDD$$If[$\$a$gdR; $xa$gd;' $7$8$H$a$gd!Q$ & Fx[$\$a$gd!Q$[$\$a$gdv$[$\$a$gdtW $ & Fxa$gd!Q$a$gd $xa$gdR;** * **0*2*^*a**************+#+$+2+3+V+{+++++̼yynycyXhkhe6mH sH hkhmH sH hkhFSmH sH hkh%i>mH sH hWXmH sH hkh;d5CJaJmH sH hkh%i>5CJaJmH sH hkhEe5CJaJmH sH hkh5CJaJmH sH hkh?t+mH sH hFSmH sH hkhHmH sH hkhi\mH sH hkhgmH sH  +++ ,b,d,:--?.E.K.L.S.W.Z._.e.g.h.p.////0000U1x1|1111ԹԹԣwk``Uhkh imH sH hkhOQmH sH hkh.6mH sH hkh{QmH sH hkh.mH sH hkhgmH sH hkhw6lmH sH hkhwumH sH hkh8s?mH sH hkh#mH sH hvmH sH hFSmH sH hkhEemH sH hkhe6mH sH hkhi\mH sH hkhWmH sH !1111111C3E333V4\4]4d44444445B5D555556666 7777707R7i7888Գɨthkh!QmH sH h*0h!QmH sH hDhmH sH hFSmH sH hDhDmH sH hkhmH sH +hkhCJOJQJ\^JaJmH sH hkhgmH sH hkh{QmH sH hkh.mH sH hkhOQmH sH hkh\wjmH sH *8888888899#929;9M9w99:#:2:h:::::::;;; ;2<<<><O<Q<l<y<<<<<<<<<C=D=\=]=g=n===׵̜hkhekmH sH hFSmH sH hkh.mH sH hkh{Q6]mH sH hkh{QmH sH hkh6mH sH hkhgmH sH hkhToTmH sH hkh\wjmH sH hkhmH sH hvmH sH 4========== > >>]>k>>^?_??@@5@B@O@_@t@u@@@!Aݽvk`kUkUk`M`M`hR;mH sH hkh{mH sH hkheQmH sH hkh}2mH sH hkhmH sH hvWhvWmH sH hvWhcmH sH hvWhmH sH hvWhiRmH sH hkh%5CJaJmH sH hkh%i>5CJaJmH sH hkh{5CJaJmH sH hkh%5CJaJmH sH hkh;{~mH sH hwumH sH !A/AhAAAAAAAAAASB^BiB|BBBBBBBBB=CDCCCDDDDDDDDDDDD·߷ߎ׎{qeqeqeqeqhCchCc5mH sH hCchCc5\hkhw3mH sH h(mH sH hkh(mH sH hkhP" mH sH hkhr,mH sH hiRmH sH hkhCmH sH (hkh}2CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH hFSmH sH hkh{mH sH hkheQmH sH hkhK.mH sH 'DDDDD$$If[$\$a$gdR;DDDDDDDDDDDEEEE2E3E4E;Eb@bǵǵxm\PD;DhYN]mH sH hkhmi]mH sH h;{~hmi]mH sH  h;{~hmiB*\mH phsH h;{~hmimH sH &hkh%6OJQJ]^JmH sH &hkh7~6OJQJ]^JmH sH (hFOzhFOzCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH "h*CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH "hs|+CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH (h*hs|+CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH "h[CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH @bBbrbtbccc|c~ccccccccc d:dBdJdLdNdjdrddddddddۼ꫟~~shs]hshsRh;{~hmH sH h;{~h{mH sH h;{~hbmH sH h;{~hnmH sH h;{~hpzumH sH h;{~hmH sH h;{~hzmH sH h;{~hmi\mH sH  h;{~hmiB*]mH phsH h;{~hmi0JmH sH #jh;{~hmiUmH sH jh;{~hmiUmH sH h;{~hmimH sH hkhmimH sH dee4e6e8efepexeze|eee?f@fAf|f}fffffffffffɺɨɊwfwSwSwS$h;{~h<#>B*KH$\mH phsH  h;{~hB*]mH phsH $h;{~hB*KH$\mH phsH  h;{~hM~B*]mH phsH h;{~hM~0JmH sH #jh;{~hM~UmH sH jh;{~hM~UmH sH h;{~hM~mH sH h;{~hrmH sH h;{~hmH sH h;{~hmH sH h;{~h<#>mH sH |efgg$D &`#$gd $<a$gdmi<gdmifgg_g`gagggggggg$Dɱڣɘ~|mbVJV9V jh;{~hHU\mH sH h;{~hP]\mH sH h;{~hH\mH sH h;{~hmimH sH h;{~he0B*mH phsH Uh;{~h7~B*mH phsH h;{~he0mH sH h;{~h7~mH sH h;{~hr0J]mH sH /jh;{~hrB*U]mH phsH  h;{~hrB*]mH phsH )jh;{~hrB*U]mH phsH  h;{~h<#>B*]mH phsH  Harper Collins Pulishers (pp. 293) OConnor, J. & I. McDermott (1997); The Art of Systems Thinking: Essential Skills for Creativity and Problem Solving; Thorsons/Harper Collins Publishers (pp. 264) Rosado, C. (2004a); Building Your Leadership Team;  HYPERLINK "http://www.rosado.net/pdf/Building_Your_Leadership_Team.pdf" http://www.rosado.net/pdf/Building_Your_Leadership_Team.pdf,; Accessed on: May 15, 2007 Rosado, C.; (2004b) Drawing Outside the Lines: Value Systems, Memetics, and Education in the Third Millennium;  HYPERLINK "http://www.rosado.net/pdf/Memetics_Education_1.pdf" http://www.rosado.net/pdf/Memetics_Education_1.pdf; Accessed on May 27, 2007 Siemens, G. (2006); Knowing Knowledge; Lulu (pp. 176) Zohar, D. & I. Marshall (2004); Spiritual Capital: Wealth We Can Live By; Berrett Koehler Publishers (pp. 324) Zohar, D. & I. Marshall (2002); SQ Spiritual Inteligence; Bloomsbury Publishing (pp. 336).     PAGE  PAGE 1 DEFOPQ~tia]a]a]a]Sjh2 0JUh) jh) UhkhmH sH h;{~hpzumH sH h;{~h;RvmH sH h;{~hmH sH &j, h;{~hHU\mH sH h;{~hP]\mH sH h;{~h;Rv\mH sH h;{~hH\mH sH h;{~hH0J\mH sH  jh;{~hHU\mH sH &j h;{~hHU\mH sH hkhmH sH h) h2 0JmHnHuh2 jh2 0JU h2 0J $<a$gdmi6&P1h:p/ =!"#$% $$If!vh55=55x55 #v#v=#v#vx#v#v :Vl t655=55x55 $$If!vh55=55x55 #v#v=#v#vx#v#v :Vl t655=55x55 $$If!vh55=55x55 #v#v=#v#vx#v#v :Vl t655=55x55 $$If!vh55=55x55 #v#v=#v#vx#v#v :Vl t655=55x55 $$If!vh55=55x55 #v#v=#v#vx#v#v :VlK t655=55x55 $$If!vh55=55x55 #v#v=#v#vx#v#v :Vl t655=55x55 $$If!vh55=55x55 #v#v=#v#vx#v#v :Vl t655=55x55 $$If!vh55=55x55 #v#v=#v#vx#v#v :Vl t655=55x55 aDyK ;http://www.aleph.se/Trans/Cultural/Memetics/memecycle.htmlyK vhttp://www.aleph.se/Trans/Cultural/Memetics/memecycle.htmleDyK <http://www.12manage.com/methods_graves_spiral_dynamics.htmlyK xhttp://www.12manage.com/methods_graves_spiral_dynamics.htmlEDyK 4http://cleamc11.vub.ac.be/Papers/Memetics-Namur.pdfyK hhttp://cleamc11.vub.ac.be/Papers/Memetics-Namur.pdfeDyK <http://www.rosado.net/pdf/Building_Your_Leadership_Team.pdfyK xhttp://www.rosado.net/pdf/Building_Your_Leadership_Team.pdfADyK 3http://www.rosado.net/pdf/Memetics_Education_1.pdfyK fhttp://www.rosado.net/pdf/Memetics_Education_1.pdf@@@ NormalCJ_HaJmHsHtHZ@Z  Heading 1$<@&5CJ KH OJQJ\^JaJ \@\ 7~ Heading 2$<@& 56CJOJQJ\]^JaJ^@2^ _\O Heading 3 d,@&&5;B*CJOJQJ\^JaJphDA@D Default Paragraph FontRi@R  Table Normal4 l4a (k@(No ListB^@B B Normal (Web)dd[$\$.X@. BEmphasis6]4U@4 _\O Hyperlink >*phe@" +HTML Preformatted7 2( Px 4 #\'*.25@9CJOJQJ^JaJ4 @24 Footer  p#.)@A.  Page NumberFV@QF P]FollowedHyperlink >*B* phj@cj P] Table Grid7:V0^+)'(w .%.Wz!!!:$0333_57::::::::::::;;3;4;<;B;H;U;;;;;;;;<<<$<)</<:<y<<<<<<<<== ='=-=2=u===========2>?@mCEHyHQLP4T5TAThVtVVW-X|XXYZZ[[\\]]4^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^000000000 000 0000000 00000 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000000000U0U0U0U0U0U0U0U0U0U0U0U0U0U0U0@0I00@0I00@0I00@0I00@0@0@0@0@0@0I00===2>^K00ZI00I00I00 $$$'v   5o"%*+18=!ADGJmMW']u_@bdfD4789:;<=>?ABCDEFHUWXYZ[\]_bc"DDD4EEEFFFG-GGG2H|e5@GIJKLMNOPQRSTV^d6?WWWXFYY#ZfZZ[5\q\\@]s]^XXXXXX  '!!8@0(  B S  ?REFhV^rV^b btb b%bb <&bdk(bc&b b+bL+b$bb$>(b b|Cblb L7bDbb ̛b bbd2b$7bd2b+b^bbp^( mCmCFW X XXXXXYZ\]n^^     lvvd. sCsCFWXXXXXXYZ\]x^^ Z*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceNamehttp://www.5iantlavalamp.com/=*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceType8 *urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsdateh*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsCity0http://www.5iamas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsV*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplacehttp://www.5iantlavalamp.com/ dW 10151720072527456DayMonthYear                   (/0;w|},2w}gq+ 1 ~ X _   L W W^}x~Z`6<)0 " D#J#K#S#6(=())1133A4I4D8K8:::::::::::::::::::;;;;2;4;;;<;A;B;G;H;T;U;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;<<<<#<$<(<)<.</<9<:<x<y<<<<<<<<<<<<<=== =&='=,=-=1=2=W=X=n=o=s=u================??^@d@nEvEzFFGGEJQJOOOOPPgQlQBUNUVVWWWW-X5XBXKXLXRXTX\X]XhXiXpXYYZZ[ [[[\\]]^^4^9^a^l^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ } Z`z ""&&1133:::::::::::::::::::;;;;2;4;;;<;A;B;G;H;T;U;;;;;;;;;;;;;<<<<#<$<(<)<.</<9<:<x<y<<<<<<<<<<<<<=== =&='=,=-=1=2=t=u==============BBHxH1L8LRRWWvX{XXXYY8[;[r\t\\\4^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^33333333333333333333333333BD --uUvU#V(V.V;V;^`o(. ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.^`o(. ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.^`o(. ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.^`.^`.pp^p`.@ @ ^@ `.^`.^`.^`.^`.PP^P`.^`.^`.pp^p`.@ @ ^@ `.^`.^`.^`.^`.PP^P`.XX^X`o(. ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.^`CJOJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(opp^p`CJOJQJo(@ @ ^@ `CJOJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(PP^P`CJOJQJo(#0l1#+dvbk7z0QMaINfWZ-65'&,VdY2HQOkCYNa7 w ) , @R e P" #[c,na0%.bgeQ{t' Av^G#+]veW%g67yT D"1#:{#}#p&'()O@)`)?t+s|+r+?,T_-u-e0o0{3V4\4?5x5@56Ra6e69v:@=<#>%i>v>Ua?8s?zy?i@XaA!C D0GsGNHvUHaH8L+7N\QN_\O nO?POP ZP{P?QOQ!RR%0R$dR(}RFSToT,U{UPBW]WvWWX[XYY>;Zi\P]jf`cCc5d;dEe3f4f?f|gdimij8Rj\wjekhkXzkw6lnrop})rTrs}sLttuuwupzu;Rv>wBkxFOzP{k}7~<~;{~r,YZ }tW{Qr*c},l/6gwv4B&+ R;T] +I6LAFm W(o,rZAKkH*0s};'D^J.'I}2{.4UK40iRYq6~x$2 )F`%w3Mz2 {ljCUg) sz!QePH-,{JK.8C i/BNL.7G'U'<M~fap5C'Q8V%%L.=&7D'q{>BG+zw>'-z7:::::::::::;;3;4;<;B;H;U;;;;;;;;<<<$<)</<:<y<<<<<<<<== ='=-=2=u===========2>^%0%0%03333@@@܄T@@*%d#$WXYZ^@,\@bd@@UnknownG: Times New Roman5Symbol3& : Arial?5 z Courier New;Wingdings"1J&zM&vJ&sP0sP0!x4d_^_^2qHX ?;d2&MEMETICS IN TEAM-BUILDING EDUCATIONUserJasmina(       Oh+'0 (4 T ` l x(MEMETICS IN TEAM-BUILDING EDUCATIONUser Normal.dotJasmina160Microsoft Office Word@*zD@\RO@6,@TscsP՜.+,D՜.+,T hp|  0_^ 'MEMETICS IN TEAM-BUILDING EDUCATION Title4 8@ _PID_HLINKSA$|*3http://www.rosado.net/pdf/Memetics_Education_1.pdfw + <http://www.rosado.net/pdf/Building_Your_Leadership_Team.pdfw .9 4http://cleamc11.vub.ac.be/Papers/Memetics-Namur.pdfw r<http://www.12manage.com/methods_graves_spiral_dynamics.htmlw /,;http://www.aleph.se/Trans/Cultural/Memetics/memecycle.htmlw 'W<http://www.12manage.com/methods_maslow_hierarchy_needs.htmlw   !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdeghijklmopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry FucData f1Tablen KWordDocument8SummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjq  FMicrosoft Office Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q