Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 330109
Comparison between the heterotrophic cultivation of Paracoccus denitrificans in continuous stirred tank reactor and horizontal rotating tubular bioreactor
Comparison between the heterotrophic cultivation of Paracoccus denitrificans in continuous stirred tank reactor and horizontal rotating tubular bioreactor // Process Biochemistry, 41 (2006), 9; 2024-2028 doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2006.05.001 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 330109 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Comparison between the heterotrophic cultivation of Paracoccus denitrificans in continuous stirred tank reactor and horizontal rotating tubular bioreactor
Autori
Rezić, Tonči ; Šantek, Božidar ; Novak, Srđan ; Marić, Vladimir
Izvornik
Process Biochemistry (1359-5113) 41
(2006), 9;
2024-2028
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Paracoccus denitrificans; Heterotrophic cultivation; Continuous stirred tank reactor; Horizontal rotating tubular bioreactor; Dilution rate; Biofilm
Sažetak
Bacterium Paracoccus denitrificans is capable to obtain metabolic energy by oxidation of ammonia (chemolitotrophic metabolism) and organic compounds (chemoorganotrophic or heterotrophic metabolism). It can also perform nitrate and nitrite respiration. When cultivated in certain conditions P. denitrificans can conduct the complete transformation of ammonia into gaseous nitrogen and consequently the whole nitrogen removal process can be carried out in one step. These characteristics make it suitable for successful treatment of wastewater with high nitrogen content. In this work the heterotrophic cultivation of P. denitrificans was studied in continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) and in horizontal rotating tubular bioreactor (HRTB). Bioprocess dynamics, efficiency and stability in both bioreactors were examined at different dilution rates (D = 0.0333– 0.1667 h^-1). In both cases, bioprocess dynamics was monitored by the analysis of biomass, substrate and metabolites concentrations in the liqiud outflow. The bioprocess efficiency and stability was much higher in HRTB than in CSTR. Advantages of HRTB over CSTR were more obvious at higher dilution rates as a consequence of bacterial biofilm formation on the inner surface of HRTB that enabled better biomass retention.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Biotehnologija
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus