ࡱ> ~}U@bjbj 4>R  nnn8J$9z(r8t8t8t8t8t8t8$s;R=H88a9fr8r8>4.6n 0`3n04.8Dw90946 >6J >,.6 >.6r88j jj Network competencies Mgr. Tereza Francov, Department of Managerial Psychology and Sociology, Faculty of Business Administration, University of Economics,Prague, Czech Republic, francovt@vse.cz Prof. Ljubica Baki-Tomi, Ph.D., Faculty of Teacher Education, University of Zagreb, Croatia, lj.bakic-tomic@ufzg.hr Armano Srbljinovi, M.Sc., Institute for Research and Development of Defence Systems, Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Croatia, armano.srbljinovic@morh.hr Abstract Network competencies and skills are the key ones for people who work with information and knowledge. These competencies enable creation and maintenance of social networks. The scope of relations among network members ranges from purely formal connections to deeply personal ties. Network relationships are based on social trust, the willingness of participants to be helpful and cooperate, and their expectations of getting something in return. Networks exist within companies and organisations, but can also cross their borders. They grow thanks to competencies of individuals, but companies can purposively and systematically support development of network competencies to their advantage. Key words: networking, network, competencies, communication skills, social skills, information, knowledge, knowledge worker, knowledge management, social capital Introduction Networking is about working with networks of individuals, companies, company departments, organisations, organisational subunits and/or various other agencies. It is a common characteristic of components and nodes of a social network that they are able to offer something to each other and that they are willing to do so. Networking is a process of making personal and professional contacts with other people, creating networks which transmit advice, information, support, energy, and other tangible or intangible goods (Boe, 2000). Much of the popular literature often focuses on "how to find the right contact". You can find many pieces of advice on how to behave, what to say, even how to think when you meet people (RoAne, 2004). All of this may be very useful, but we must also not forget to take care about the contacts that we already have. It is necessary to invest efforts in maintaining already existing relationships and in strengthening them further by building mutual trust. One may become a part of a network because he or she gets to know someone who already belongs to the network. In other words, a direct personal relationship (e.g. a friend, or a family member) or a dyadic economic interaction (e.g. a colleague, or a client) with a network member may take place and serve as a means of introducing a new member. In some cases new members are recruited by making use of the networks social capital, as when a third party acts as an intermediary in connecting an old member with a new one. In all of these cases a certain amount of trust exists from the beginning. Subsequently, mutual trust is enhanced in several ways. The first possible means of developing additional trust is by deepening of a personal relationship. The second vehicle is deepening of a dyadic economic interaction through acquiring experience from specific work situations, knowledge of concrete skills, competencies etc. The third means of developing mutual trust is the evolution of reputation (Hite, 2005). Networks, their components, relationships among them, and the quality of trust are not static. "[N]etworks are dynamic objects not just because things happen in networked systems, but because the networks themselves are evolving and changing in time, driven by the activities or decisions of those very components." (Watts, 2003, p. 28). Networks evolve over time as more members are acquired, as they meet each other and form recurring patterns of interaction. In most circumstances, the relationships become more personal and the mutual trust gradually increases. Network competencies Network competencies consist of various skills, attitudes and other personal characteristics. Researchers examined characteristics such as gender, socioeconomic background, self-esteem, extraversion, and attitudes toward workplace politics. They also recommended several other characteristics to be examined, e.g. self-efficacy and self-monitoring (Forret and Dougherty, 2001). The focus of these analyses is on the amount of networking, and not on its quality. Let us think for a moment about the quality or the success in networking. What could be the key personal characteristics for successful networking? Social skills are crucial for establishing first contacts. Communication skills, such as active listening, the ability to provide timely feedback information, negotiation skills, and the ability to use convincing arguments are of particular importance for maintaining a productive relationship. Very important also is the attitude the willingness to be open and receptive, to help, cooperate, share information and knowledge, take initiative, etc. Other desirable characteristics include steadiness, perseverance and patience. Whether a business contact will become personal depends not on the characteristics of one party only. There should be some similarities between the two parties involved as, for instance, a common working style or the acceptance of common values, mutual sympathy etc. However, similarities must not dominate all the aspects of a relationship and the participants also have to differ in certain respects. They may have different competencies, different access to other agents or artefacts, or different points of view on them. The interplay between homogeneity and heterogeneity brings about the necessary compatibility as, for example, when one party is interested in using an artefact, and the other in supplying it. Compatibility of such kind is known as "aligned directedness" (Lane and Maxfield, 1996). Trust, in general, is a property of a social relation. "It depends, of course, on the nature of my interests, your interests, our knowledge of each other, and possibly other attributes (such as gender, occupation, or education level). It also depends, however, on the larger context of our social relations and the broader network of relations that surround us." (Cook and Hardin, 2001, p. 331). One must be aware that an individual cannot join networks indefinitely. Human ability to maintain connections to other individuals is limited. "In all known times and contexts, [] the scope of effective acquaintance, persons known in the relevant minimal sense, clusters around one thousand as median. Or, to focus on just the relations intense enough to persist indefinitely vis--vis ego, there seem to be around sixteen as a mode []" (White, 1992, p.76). Human brain is optimised for keeping track of social relationships in groups of 150 or less (Dunbar, 1998). Sparsely connected networks may undoubtedly grow to a much larger extent, but fundamental limits on the number of connections maintained by individual members still apply. Networking and intellectual capital Networking may provide an important strategy for managing ones career (Forret and Dougherty, 2001). "When a man changes jobs, he is not only moving from one network of ties to another, but also establishing a link between these. Such a link is often of the same kind which facilitated his own movement." (Granovetter, 1973, p. 1373). Granovetter observed that weak ties are especially important for getting useful job information because "those to whom we are weakly tied are more likely to move in circles different from our own and will thus have access to information different from that which we receive." (ibid., p. 1371). "This suggests that the kind of people you know is more important for obtaining information than the number of people you know." (Wellman and Gulia, 1998). The importance of networking at the individual level cannot be overstated, but the beneficial effects of networking are even greater at the more aggregated level of organisational units. The effects can be observed both within an organisation as well as across the networked organisations. Networking may be viewed as a part of the intellectual capital of an organisation, which comprises human capital, social capital, and organisation capital (Armstrong, 2002). Human capital consists of experience, knowledge and skills of the personnel, including the earlier mentioned individual competencies enabling successful networking. Social capital is "the structure of individuals contact networks the pattern of interconnection among the various people with whom each person is tied" (Raider and Burt, 1996). Organisation capital refers to various forms of knowledge contained in databases, manuals, codes and processes of the organisation. An important property of the organisation capital is that it does not disappear with a departure of any key individual. This is particularly true for flexible network structures where individuals easily change their roles depending on external circumstances. When a node of the network is lost, the surrounding nodes quickly establish new connections and share responsibilities of the former member. The network changes its structure and adapts rapidly, without a loss of functionality (Penzar and Srbljinovi, 2005). Network connections between individuals and organisational units are often multiple, so that in reality complex multiple networks and hierarchies often exist. Hence we may speak about a whole meta-network of networks consisting of the operative network, the financial network, the administrative network, the network of trust, the knowledge network, the information network, etc. The same node may have different roles in these different networks (Carley et al., 2002). Knowledge workers The key employees nowadays are knowledge workers, who bring advantage to organisations, mostly in the form of knowledge and innovation. We are tempted to see only managers as knowledge workers, even though teachers, scientists, doctors, and members of many other professions develop, use, or work with knowledge. Although knowledge workers operate relatively independently, they also share information and knowledge and form knowledge networks. As they are hold responsible for quality results, they endeavour to enhance their knowledge and skills, create new knowledge and bring innovations. They often need an all-encompassing view of not only their company, but also of the entire branch that their company belongs to (Trune ek, 2004). To attain such a broad perspective, knowledge workers utilise both internal and external organisational networks. Whether an employee will become an active net-worker depends on personal as well as on organisational characteristics. Organisational environment provides a sort of an ecology in which an individual's network competencies may thrive or deteriorate. "For example, each learner in an organisation possesses a personal learning network. The health of this network is influenced by the suitability of the ecology in which the learner exists. If the ecology is healthy, it will permit networks to flourish and grow. If the ecology is not healthy, networks will not develop optimally." (Siemens, 2006, p.92). The role of organisations What can an organisation do to support networking activities on the individual level? Networking cannot be entirely directed, but it can be supported at least. Very important in this respect is a firms organisational culture, together with the shared values on which it is founded, and the management style which it encourages. Recruiters of new personnel should focus not only on human capital in the form of knowledge and skills of the personnel, but also on the networking activities and the characteristics of networks, i.e. on social capital. Information and database systems as tools to store and share information, e.g. contacts, and knowledge are also very important. Organisations should support employees in networking activities within a company, as well as encourage them to join inter-organisational networks, especially those linking professionals and knowledge workers. Employees should have the opportunities to actively participate in workshops and seminars, teach courses, foster relations with public media, etc. Lane and Maxfield argue that one of the crucial preconditions for an organisation to prosper in a constantly changing environment is development of especially productive network relationships called "generative relationships" (Lane and Maxfield, 1996). Generative relationships produce new sources of value that cannot be foreseen in advance, and they are indispensable in coping with complex foresight horizons. The key features of generative relationships include the earlier mentioned characteristics of aligned directedness, heterogeneity, and recurring patterns of interaction, as well as the appropriate permissions to enter the relationship, and the action opportunities to realize the generative potential. References Armstrong, M. (2002); Xzen lidskch zdrojo; Grada Publishing, Praha Boe, A. (2000); span networking; Zbavn a prosperujc obchodn vztahy; Alman, Brno Carley, K.M., Lee, J.-S. and D. Krackhardt (2002); Destabilizing Networks; Connections, Vol. 24, No. 3 (pp. 79-92) Collison, C. and G. Parcel (2005); Knowledge Management; Computer Press, Brno Cook, K.S. and R. Hardin (2001); Norms of Cooperativeness and Networks of Trust; Social Norms (eds. M. Hechter and K.-D. Opp), Russell Sage Foundation (pp. 327-347) Dunbar, R. (1998); Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language; Harvard University Press Forret, M.L. and T.W. Dougherty (2001); Correlates of Networking Behavior for Managerial and Professional Employees; Group & Organization Management, Vol. 26, No. 3 (pp. 283-311) Granovetter, M. (1973); The Strength of Weak Ties; American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78, No. 6 (pp. 1360-1380) Hite, J.M. (2005); Evolutionary Processes and Paths of Relationally Embedded Network Ties in Emerging Entrepreneurial Firms; Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Vol. 29, No. 1 (pp. 113-144) Jirsek, J. (2004); Souboj mozko vYzen; Alfa Publishing, Praha Lane D. and R. Maxfield (1996); Strategy under Complexity: Fostering Generative Relationships; International Journal of Strategic Management: Long Range Planning, Vol. 29, No. 2 (pp. 215-231) Michael, J. and G. Youkl (2003); Managerial Level and Subunit Function as Determinants of Networking Behavior in Organizations; Group & Organization Management, Vol. 18, No. 3 (pp. 328-351) Penzar D. and A. Srbljinovi (2005); About modelling of complex networks with applications to terrorist group modelling; Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, Vol. 3, No. 1 (pp. 27-43) Raider, H.J. and R.S. Burt (1996); Boundaryless careers and social capital; The Boundaryless Career (eds. M.B. Arthur and D.M. Rousseau), Oxford University Press (pp. 187-200) RoAne, S. (2004); How to Create Your Own Luck: The "You Never Know" Approach to Networking, Taking Chances, and Opening Yourself to Opportunity; John Wiley and Sons Siemens, G. (2006); Knowing Knowledge; Lulu.com;  HYPERLI(*,X J f j t v ~  ? Q ] ^ n ~ ȼȂwlwaYalYlYh1mH sH hrhw mH sH hrhx8mH sH hrh+;mH sH hrhu6mH sH h!5\]mH sH h!h!5OJQJ^Jh!5mH sH hrhu65mH sH hrhe05mH sH hrhe0mH sH hrhe0CJaJmH sH h!h+;CJaJmH sH h!he0CJaJmH sH "*, v <=J_&|Ti7n#n#n#n#n#n#n#n#n#n#n#xgd: $`a$gdu6gdu6$a$gdu6 $xa$gdu6dgdu6 $xxa$gdUk $xa$gdUk$a$gdUk$a$gde0  !@gd# ,}~  ' - 2 > N \ j p s u  -ACbq<=Jnhrh]6mH sH hrhe05CJaJmH sH hrhe0mH sH hrhe05mH sH hrh+;mH sH hcmH sH hrhw mH sH hrhx8mH sH h1mH sH hrhu6mH sH 6nrstw #+=>Blq R]^_&(7OYhmH sH hrh mH sH hrhpmH sH h:mH sH hrh+;mH sH hrhZmH sH hXXmH sH hrhc 8mH sH hcmH sH hrhw mH sH hrh]6mH sH hrhvmH sH 5*5DW[glop 'Bp}.0f{|#*.hrhHEmH sH hrhwNmH sH hrhU%mH sH hrhVFmH sH hrhJmH sH hrhm mH sH hrhpmH sH hrh]6mH sH A%'*8FGS[{|w~1QTiq}9S߾ɳɳߨߘߍ߂hrhU%mH sH hrhc 8mH sH hrh@Kz5CJaJmH sH hrhw mH sH hrhwmH sH hrhN5mH sH hrh|vmH sH hrhZmH sH hrh]6mH sH hrhHEmH sH hrh+;mH sH 0Smo#&)7<DQfj#46ALST\hu|~$+E[gkv ɾɾɾ߾߾߾߾߾߾߾hrh6]mH sH hrh\.mH sH hrhB@mH sH hrh.mH sH hrh]6mH sH hrhw mH sH hrhQnmH sH F7!"t%%()+.51G12<5789:<>>`@n#n#n#n#n#n#n# $<a$gd: $xxa$gd:$7$8$H$`a$gdr $`a$gdC $xa$gd: $`a$gdu6  <AJ2    G !!!"""### #@#A#D#Z$\$ɾɾԠzzhI9mH sH hhmH sH hhxmH sH hmH sH h|%mH sH hrh?<mH sH hrh6]mH sH hrh!mH sH hrhemH sH hrh|%mH sH hrhN5mH sH hrhPmH sH hrh]6mH sH ,\$]$h$j$$$$$$$$%e%f%g%s%t%%%%%%%&&&&$'F'q' (((ynycynyn[ShCmH sH hI9mH sH hrhu)mH sH hrh\PmH sH hrhb<mH sH hrh!mH sH hrhmH sH hrh]6mH sH hrh@Kz5CJaJmH sH hhxmH sH h#RmH sH hmH sH h^mH sH hhmH sH h^\mH sH hh\mH sH hmH sH  ((((((d)e)))))))))))))))))**** *S*_*g*y*z*{******+ +3+++++++ϹϮģģģģģěģģąąģzhrh3$mH sH hrh'mH sH hrh+;mH sH hCmH sH hrhSmH sH hrh%imH sH hrhmH sH hrh]6mH sH hrhc 8mH sH hrhb<mH sH hrh\PmH sH h >mH sH hI9mH sH 0++++++,,,K,W,Y,[,,,,,,,,,,,,g-v---,.>.N.P......///0000001314151߾hrhDTmH sH hG hshDThDTh0mH sH hrhmH sH h"}mH sH hrh'mH sH hrhLmH sH hrhSmH sH hrh]6mH sH hrhc 8mH sH hrh0mH sH 151G1J1f1111111 2222322222222"3J3Q3U3n33333333333333364T4V4^444444 5仰以䥉~hrh'mH sH hrhmH sH !jhrhN0JUmH sH hrhNmH sH hrhmWmH sH hmWmH sH hrhc 8mH sH hrhbmH sH hrh@KzmH sH hrh]6mH sH hrh@Kz5CJaJmH sH 1 585:5<5L5P5d55555666666777778888+8t8z8~888888888888ڹ|qfqffffhrhpOmH sH hrho!mH sH hrh@Kz5CJaJmH sH h% =^JmH nHsH tHhr^JmH nHsH tH hrhr^JmH nHsH tHhrhrmH sH hrhc 8mH sH hrhN{TmH sH hrh]6mH sH h]6mH sH hmWmH sH hrhmH sH (8899,9.969F9Z99999::::(:6::::::::;; ;;;B;W;q;r;;;;;;;;;;<<5<<<<<=]=x=======>>>>ɾ߾߳߾hrh)7VmH sH hrhSmH sH hrh 1mH sH hrh)mH sH hrhc 8mH sH hrh# mH sH hrhmH sH hrhpOmH sH hrh]6mH sH >>>B>>>>>>>> ?@,@^@n@~@@@@@AAA(AAABBBϿwog_TIhrh-mH sH hrhGmH sH hmH sH hGmH sH h]6mH sH hrhKmH sH hrh4}$mH sH hrh4}$0J6mH sH hrh]60J6mH sH hrh]6mH sH hrh@KzmH sH hrh]65CJaJmH sH hrh@Kz5CJaJmH sH hrhSmH sH hrhmH sH hrh)mH sH `@AAIBBKCCoD0E\FGXIqJ!KK[x2yzr{||,}}~n#n#n#n#n#n#n#n#n#n#n#n#$a$gdN<gd: $<a$gd:B)B2B3BIBBBC2CJCKC^CjCqCrCsCCCCCCCCCCD/D0DSDnDoDzDDDDDE·~shss]s]s]s~shrhmH sH hrh3$mH sH hrh|<mH sH hrh_umH sH hrh-mH sH hrhJmH sH  h8\h8h8\h8h8mH sH h8hGg5mH sH hrhGg5mH sH hrh]6mH sH hrh@KzmH sH hrh]60J6mH sH hrhf0J6mH sH $E'E+E.E/E0ECEF*FZF\F^FFFFGGGGGGGGGGGHHH߹vk`UJhrh_umH sH hrhA6mH sH hrh-mH sH hrh?<mH sH hrh 1]^JmH sH hrh?<]^JmH sH hrh 1^JmH sH hrhPr^JmH sH hrh-^JmH sH hrh?<^JmH sH hrh]60J6mH sH hrhPrmH sH hrh]6mH sH hrh3$mH sH hrh|<mH sH HHHIFITIVIXI\IIIJJ$JFJpJqJJJJJK K!K3KKKKźŤůŖzlaSKFS h\hh\hh0J6mH sH h-0J6mH sH hrh`z0J6mH sH hrhc40J6mH sH hrh-0J6mH sH hrhJ0J6mH sH hrh `CmH sH hrhMmH sH hrh-mH sH hrhmH sH hrh_umH sH hrh]6mH sH hrhA6mH sH hrh]60J6mH sH KKKLxx,x.x/x0xXxYxZx[xxx y y y/y0y1y2yFyzԥ~qdYNhrh]6mH sH hrhmmH sH hrh`z0JmH sH hrh`z0JmH sH &jhrh`zU]mH sH $jhrh`z0J6UmH sH hrh`z0J6mH sH hih80JmH sH &jhih8U]mH sH h8h80J6mH sH Ujh80J6UmH sH h80J6mH sH NK "http://www.knowingknowledge.com/book.php" http://www.knowingknowledge.com/book.php Stephenson, K. (1998); What Knowledge Tears Apart, Networks Make Whole; Reprinted from Internal Communication Focus, No. 36;  HYPERLINK "http://www.netform.com/html/icf.pdf" http://www.netform.com/html/icf.pdf Tapscott, D. (1999); Digitln ekonomika  Nadje a hrozby vku informa n spole nosti; Computer Press, Brno Trune ek, J. (2004/2); Znalostn podnik ve znalostn spole nosti; Professional Publishing, Praha Watts, D.J. (2003); Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age; W.W. Norton & Company Wellman, B. and M. Gulia (1998); Net Surfers Don't Ride Alone: Virtual Communities as Communities; Networks in the Global Village (ed. B. Wellman), Westview Press (pp. 331-367) White, H.C. (1992); Identity and Control: A Structural Theory of Social Action; Princeton University Press  There is an important difference in the meaning of terms "data", "information", and "knowledge". Data are facts that describe reality, and they have no meaning without an appropriate context. Information connects data with a goal, so that there is an interpretation providing meaning. Knowledge presents a still higher form because it includes experience with the information, carrying a sense of "know how". There are two rather different types of knowledge, explicit and implicit. Explicit knowledge is easy to describe, explain and share. Implicit or tacit knowledge may be difficult to recognize because we do not usually realize when we make recourse to tacit knowledge. Tacit knowledge is nevertheless shared throughzzzzzz0{2{4{p{r{{|||.|>|s|||||||||||+},}-}.}a}g}h}l}źyqfq[fh^h"}mH sH h^h"}mH sH h"}mH sH jh"}0JUmH sH hrhAmH sH hAmH sH hCmH sH hhAmH sH hI9mH sH h~HmH sH hrh=BmH sH hrh~HmH sH hrh&mH sH hrh]6mH sH hrhmmH sH hrh]60J6mH sH #l}m}o}p}{}|}}}}}`~f~m~q~z~|~~~~~~~~~hy|}~ʹʵܪhrhAmH sH h"}h!0JmHnHu h"}0Jjh"}0JUjh}bUh}bUh"}mH sH h^h"}mH sH h^h"}mH sH 6 formal and non-formal networks and trust is a catalyst for the creation and transfer of tacit knowledge (Stephenson, 1998).      PAGE 1 $<a$gd:$a$ 2&P1h:p_6/ =!"#$%DyK )http://www.knowingknowledge.com/book.phpyK Rhttp://www.knowingknowledge.com/book.phpDyK $http://www.netform.com/html/icf.pdfyK Hhttp://www.netform.com/html/icf.pdf@@@ u6NormalCJ_HaJmHsHtHZ@Z Heading 1$<@&5CJ KH OJQJ\^JaJ F@F Heading 2$$dh@&a$5\H@H Heading 3$dh@&5\mH sH DA@D Default Paragraph FontVi@V  Table Normal :V 44 la (k@(No List 6O6 text NTW dhx>@>  Footnote TextCJaJ@&@@ Footnote ReferenceH*VO!V Literatura - nzev publikace6]6U@16 Hyperlink >*B*ph4@B4 Header  p#4 @R4 Footer  p#.)@a. Page NumberDB@rD e0 Body Text$a$aJmH sH tHPP@P e0 Body Text 2$a$5CJ aJmH sH tH'.BQT.B;<=J_& |  Ti7t!_$5&G&')+,9.022;334T44V5 6z6;7}7=889p:;;<<O==W>>BBBBBB+B,B/B0000x00000000000000000x000x00x00x0000 00x000 000(0000(0000(00(0x00x0(0800x0(0x000 00@0x0[@0@0@0@0@0@00@[ 7t!_$5&G&+;34T44V5=889p:;;</B;00~;00;00;00;00;00;00;00;00;00;00;0 0;0 0;0 0;00;00;00~;00;00000;000{  nS \$(+51 58>>BEHKzl}&)*+,-/012345689:;@A7`@'.7C(F;~;;'<Z<~<.BXX !Tzuztzduz<[zuz>[z pzDvz>[zvzwz$xzvzDwzwzxz|xz\y33O4O4=5=5E5 8 88:<<O=>>>/B     33S4S4D5O5O5888:<<T=>>>/B  = *urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceType= *urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceNameh*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsCity0http://www.5iamas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsV*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplacehttp://www.5iantlavalamp.com/    !"*$:;ABMSV @$F$K$V$_$%%%%%%%%&&3&)#)'0/0 11 33333!3#3(353:3;3>3K3R3_3f3i3u3v3~333333333444444 5;5=5U5V5\555 66;7B7O7U7V7[7^7d7w7|777P8U88889 9999::p:u:::::::;;<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<======="=#=.=I=N===:>B>>BBBBBBBBBBB B,B/B;VYno _$4&++3333T44!6$6 9%9>BBBBBBBBBBB B,B/B333333333333:LM&TThhii  ?@ADtt z { ! !$$'$($^$4&5&5&++22344U5o:;;;F;;=V>>>=@E@F@G@@AAAAA$A$A.A6AgABBBBBBBBBBBB B,B/BBM>BBBBBBBBBBB B,B/BJasminam J$zV 7Du~8 ΐlw<D\_pN,]^|@3q>h^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hH%h^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh ^`hH.h ^`hH.h pLp^p`LhH.h @ @ ^@ `hH.h ^`hH.h L^`LhH.h ^`hH.h ^`hH.h PLP^P`LhH.h^`OJQJ^Jo(hH%hdd^d`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh4 4 ^4 `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhtt^t`OJQJo(hHhDD^D`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhhh^h`OJQJo(hHh88^8`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHohxx^x`OJQJo(hHhHH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh ^`hH.h ^`hH.h pLp^p`LhH.h @ @ ^@ `hH.h ^`hH.h L^`LhH.h ^`hH.h ^`hH.h PLP^P`LhH.h88^8`OJQJ^Jo(hH%h^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHhxx^x`OJQJ^Jo(hHohHH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHlw<@3qm _pN 7,]J$u~8   zy!^u)^Dy  # !PZ]6Jw 8HEb<3$4}$U%|%v) 1c4N5Gg5_6c 8@;;|<% =B@hA `CJKKwNOPP\P#RN{T)7VkY6]}befO"}b5c< ^\.+;VFTe?<xmW^9rtNXXxC~He0A6=BpO>;'I9)w|v1L8m 82.&Au6:A`:GSNDT<7o!C _$;>A/BAbAbAbOV0OV0@MM}NMM$%)* 3 4O7O8O9O;<=A.B @.`@4l@@@FH@@z@@UnknownG: Times New Roman5Symbol3& : ArialMTimes New Roman CEKMinionPro-Regular;Wingdings?5 z Courier New"1͛F̶&T] e5 q] e5 q!4d>> 2qHX?]6OSNOVAhpJasmina,        Oh+'0h  $ 0 <HPX`OSNOVASNOhpOpOpO Normal.dotJasmina84mMicrosoft Word 10.0@Ҿ}@cs@~3] e5՜.+,D՜.+,4 hp|  /q >{ OSNOVA TitleP 8@ _PID_HLINKSA (>$http://www.netform.com/html/icf.pdf P)http://www.knowingknowledge.com/book.php  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDFGHIJKLNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklnopqrstvwxyz{|Root Entry Fs3Data E1TableM9>WordDocument4SummaryInformation(mDocumentSummaryInformation8uCompObjj  FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q