Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 307256
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring database: analysis of omitted data.
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring database: analysis of omitted data. // Journal of Hypertension - Supplement 2
Pariz, Francuska: Elsevier, 2004. str. S166-S166. (poster, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 307256 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring database: analysis of omitted data.
Autori
Ivanuša, Mario ; Ivanuša, Zrinka
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Izvornik
Journal of Hypertension - Supplement 2
/ - : Elsevier, 2004, S166-S166.
Skup
XIV - Fourteenth European Meeting on Hypertension
Mjesto i datum
Pariz, Francuska, 13.06.2004. - 17.06.2004
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Poster
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; gender
Sažetak
Objective: Estimate frequency and differences in omitted data between large sample of consecutive out-patient and in-patient population during 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Design and Methods: Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) reports during the past 6-months were obtained using auscultatory devices (Accutracker II. SunTech Medical, USA). Monitors were pre-programmed to record BP every 30 min between 7 a. m. and 10 p. m. and every 45 min during night-time Data were analyzed as a mean± ; SD for continuous variables and as frequencies for variables on a nominal scale. For group comparisons ttest and chi-squared test were used, and values of p < 0.05 were significant. Results: We evaluated data from 260 consecutive patients referred to ABPM examination (26% in-patients ; mean age 57± ; 12 years ; 35% men). Mean 24-hour BP values were 133/77± ; 19/11mmHg (134/79x20/11 during day-time ; 124/70r20/11mmHg during nighttime) The number of used readings was 41:11 (33± ; 8 day-time ; 9± ; 7 night-time). A minimum of 70% used readings during ABPM examination was not obtained in 14% of all patients (12% out-patients vs. 16% in-patients ; p=0.410). 19% of all patients had no omitted readings at all (21% out-patients vs. 13% in-patients ; p=0.162). There where 6:11 omitted readings during daytime and 2i3 during night-time. The causes for omitted readings were background noise (48%), technical problems (27%) and body movement (6%). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean 24-hour, day-time or night-time values of systolic or diastolic BP, frequency and cause of omitted readings between our two groups of patients. Conclusions: In a large sample of our patients we found that in-patients had no better compliance and had similar frequency of omitted data in our ABPM database. The frequency of omitted data indicates that we need to pre-program our devices to record BP more frequently during the whole 24-hour period and in this way improve the efficacy of the ABPM.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE