ࡱ> <>;q`$bjbjqPqP.*::, D D D D ,p  $Lh( E; ;;  P;  ;` [D :yf0,S:$ L  l>    ;;;;DD Aerobic capacity and running economy in sprinters, middle distance, long distance and 400m runners Vu eti Vlatko, `entija Davor, Babi Vesna Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia Introduction The energy demand for running at submaximal speed (running economy, RE) can be quantified by measuring the steady-state VO2, for a given running speed. The aim of this study was to examine the differences in aerobic capacity and running economy between runners competing in running events with different aerobic and anaerobic metabolic demands. Methods Forty-eight national level male runners: ten sprinters (S) (184.94.8 cm, 76.64.8 kg), personal best (PB) on 100m sprint = 10.870.41s; fifteen 400m (S4)( 180.94.2 cm, 73.06.3 kg), PB on 400m 49.51.9s; ten middle distance (MD) (180.45.7 cm, 68.66.2 kg) and thirteen long distance (LD) (n=13; 179.16.7 cm, 69.57.0 kg ) runners participated in the study. All subjects performed two incremental treadmill tests: the first (1 km/h speed increase per minute, 1.5% grade), for determination of VO2max and the anaerobic ventilatory threshold (AnT, respiratory compensation point according to Wasserman), and a second one (2 km/h speed increase every 4 minutes, 1.5% grade) to determine running economy for the speeed range below the ventilatory anaerobic threshold. The analysis of variance was used to explore the relationship and determine differences in observed variables between the groups. Results With increasing length of track covered for a given running event, a progressive increase of aerobic capacity as well as increase of running economy was found. The groups differed significantly regarding both VO2max (55.4 3.4; 59.6 4.6; 64.4 4.4 and 66.4 4.7 ml/kgmin-1, p<0.01) and AnT (48.8 2.4; 51.5 3.9; 55.9 4.3 and 59.0 4.8 ml/kgmin-1, p<0.01), for S, S4, MD and LD, respectively. Significant differences between groups were also found for running economy at velocities below AnT (C8, metabolic cost at 8 kmh-1 0.217 0.02; 0.212 0.03; 0.208 0.02 and 0.195 0.01 ml/kgm-1, p<0.05; C10 0.215 0.01; 0.210 0.02; 0.203 0.02 and 0.191 0.02 ml/kgm-1, p<0.01; C12 0.211 0.01; 0.208 0.02; 0.198 0.01 and 0.188 0.01 ml/kgm-1, p<0.01; for S, S4, MD and LD, respectively). The increase of running economy with increasing running speed was also significant, within each single group of runners (C8 > C10 > C12, p<0.05). Conclusion The present study demonstrates differences in physiological characteristics of national level runners specializing in different racing events. Significant differences between runners of various running disciplines were present in all the observed variables of aerobic capacity and running economy. References Anderson T (1996). Sports Med 22(2):76-89 Brisswalter J, et al (1996). J Sports Med Phys Fitness 36:7-15 Conley DL, Krahenbuhl GS (1980). Med Sci Sports Exerc 12:357-60  W X v 4 7 9 A     X Z r t CȸȚ}nhPihPiCJaJmH sH hPiCJH*aJmH sH hPiCJOJQJaJmH sH hPiCJaJmH sH "hPiB*CJH*aJmH phsH hPiB*CJaJmH phsH hPi5\mH sH hPiCJH*aJmH sH hPiCJaJmH sH hPimH sH hPiCJaJmH sH &" 8 9 A @AI  @BMx5$p$$ $ & Fa$gdPi$a$gdPi $<a$gdPigdPi$a$gdPi$mAI]_ '(5<?ABCT\^afimotw{}ԼԯԯԧuihZahPiCJH*aJhxhPiCJH*aJhPiB*CJaJphh fhPiB*CJaJphh fhPiCJaJhPiCJaJhPiCJH*aJmH sH hPiCJH*aJmH sH hPi5\mH sH hPiCJaJmH sH hPihPiCJaJmH sH hPihPiCJH*aJmH sH )  "')-27:?DEFHQw  hPiCJaJmH sH hxhPiCJH*aJhPiCJaJhPiCJH*aJhxhPiCJH*aJhZahPiCJaJh fhPiCJaJhPiCJaJD ABM`jvwx$$'$3$4$5$N$c$n$o$p${$$鳤|j|_|hPihPimH sH "hPihPi6CJ]aJmH sH hPihPiCJaJmH sH UhPiCJaJmH sH hPihPimHsHhPi6CJ]aJmHsHhPiCJaJmHsHhPimH sH hPi6CJ]aJmH sH hPi5\mH sH hPimH sH hPiCJaJmH sH hPi5\mH sH  Daniels JT (1985). Med Sci Sports Exerc 17(3):332-8 Powers SK, et al (1981). Res Quart Exerc Sport 54:179-182 Pereira MA, Freedson PS (1997). Int J Sports Med 18(2):118-24 $$$$$$$h{=hPiCJaJmH sH hPimH sH hPiCJaJmH sH hPi6CJ]aJmH sH $$$$a$gdPi,1h. A!"#$% @@@ NormalCJ_HaJmHsHtH>A@> Zadani font odlomkaVi@V Obi na tablica4 l4a .k@. Bez popisa, *de89A : { * + . 000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 000de89A : { * + . 000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0@06 00+  $$ $$ $ :,;<l= l>q?q@lrA,sBlsCtD tE,uFlu .      .   9*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsStateh *urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsCity0http://www.5iamas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsB*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagscountry-region= *urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceName= *urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceTypeV *urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplacehttp://www.5iantlavalamp.com/C*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsmetricconverter> *urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PersonName  1 km/h2 km/h Babi Vesna ProductID   elms}_jkvw~    ( 1 6 8 ; < @ A L N T U Y Z ` j q 0 1 8 _ b j o  . _ 9 . 3 : + . . Jal ^`hH. ^`hH. pp^p`hH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. ^`hH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PP^P`hH.Ja(9 Т"`1U0 4\ Pi{=<{@ 9 @{ , PP@P P@PH@UnknownGz Times New Roman5Symbol3& z Arial"q  [ [ !24& &  2qHX-?PicAerobic capacity and running economy in sprinters, middle distance, long distance and 400m runners Vlatko VuceticVlatko Vucetic Oh+'0(4@P ht   dAerobic capacity and running economy in sprinters, middle distance, long distance and 400m runners Vlatko VuceticNormalVlatko Vucetic1Microsoft Office Word@^в@v[@[[ ՜.+,0L hp|  ,KIF&  dAerobic capacity and running economy in sprinters, middle distance, long distance and 400m runners Naslov  !"#$%&'()*,-./012456789:=Root Entry F[?Data 1TableWordDocument.*SummaryInformation(+DocumentSummaryInformation83CompObjs  F!Microsoft Office Wordov dokument MSWordDocWord.Document.89q