ࡱ> o@]bjbj p p . oo-x rrr | 33383T4|v~h5^:6:6:6:677d84}}}}}}}R0}9D77DD}:6:60~PPPDh:6:6}PD}PPP/lm:65 zg'3TJlyF~0v~m&L&4mm&n4 I8<P>,@I8I8I8}}.3nPd3Strategy improvement through intelligent management tools in Croatian firms Marina Dabi Vice Dean Assosciate Professor University of Osijek Mechanical Engineering Faculty Management, Organisational and Informational Department 35000 Slavonski Brod Trg Ivane Brilic Mazuranic 18 Croatia tel:++385 (0)35 446718  HYPERLINK "mailto:marina.dabic@sfsb.hr" marina.dabic@sfsb.hr Mirjana Peji-Bach Assistant Professor University of Zagreb Graduate Business School Informational Department Kennedyev trg 6 10000 Zagreb e-mail:  HYPERLINK "mailto:mpejic@efzg.hr" mpejic@efzg.hr 1. Introduction Trends that appeared together with the development and the increasing application of information technology, whose influence on the organization structure is the greatest, are the business globalization, change in the structure of employees, elimination of boundaries among the parts within the organizations, but also among individual organizations. With the increasing globalization of the business the Central Eastern European Countries (CEE) such as Croatia will face mounting competitive pressures and further squeeze on effectiveness. For the adequate running of the business operation all the requisite various information with which quantity, value and quality (or any other important) characteristics of operations are presented. However, their treatment is linked to the variety of content and methodology issues (Gunton, 1998; Fry, Stoner, 2000). Given the complexity of the management environment the development of a corporate managerial tools and techniques is likely to include the applications of strategy methodologies and information systems as tools to facilitate the exploitation of the full potential of management. What is happening is the realization that there is a new measure of tools, global tools, which incorporates the accelerating tempo of decision-making and at the same time the growing complexity of the basic concept of managerial tools due to its global nature. This paper examines the dimensions of accepted managerial tools and techniques in Croatian companies, develops a means for visualizing global management and provides insights into how to develop a support infrastructure for middle managers who have to deal with the issues associated with competition in global time. In sum, this study addresses the following research question. To what extent are intelligent managerial tools recognized in Croatian firms as the importance attributing to corporate success by managers and professionals? 2. Theoretical background In each company, there seems to be something that is as the core competence of the firms existence, and has roots of the firms in driving it forward. Quality and process improvements are recognized major strategic issues for those who wish to compete successfully. Comparatively few studies have examined the role of managerial tools as a tool for middle mangers to anticipate and address success (Reh, 2005; Singh et. Al.,2000; McQuater et. al., 1995; Rigby et.al., 2005). However, there are two factors, information technology and management, which are considered both by a great number of theoreticians as well as practitioners as being those that will make possible the construction of an organisation that will satisfy the challenges of flexibility, and in the same time provide the needed control, because in todays companies everything seems as if it were getting out of control. Possibilities of information technology are being increasingly studied and accepted by the modern business world (Malhotra, 1999). To be able to determine oneself within a turbulent environment and not just overcome the turbulence means to gain advantage. However, how is one to provide constant monitoring and responding to the changes in the mean time? Within the field of management there appears to be shortage of tools and techniques that describes best practice for managed business improvement by implementation of management tools and tecniques. Firstly, some definitions are required. What are tools and techniques? According the McQuarter et al (1995) they are practical skills, methods means or mechanisms that can applied to particular task. A very simple tools can be Pareto analysis, control charts etc. A techniques has specific application and resulting in the search and needs for more training, knowledge and skill if we wish to used them efficiently. In 1993 Bain and Company launched a multiyear research project to get the facts about management tools. The research is conducted every two years. The full definitions of the 25 tools along with the guide to resources on each one appear in the Bain & Company booklet Management Tools 2005 An Executives Guide (Rigby, 2005). Altough in the Bain research 25 management tools are examined, this research is focused only to the management tools that heavily lie on the extensive use of information technology. We call these tools intelligent management tools because of extensive use of information technology increases capability of firm to learn (Sharif, 2006). These tools are: Strategic Planning; Total Quality Management; Knowledge Management;, Customer Relationship Management; Business Process Reengineering; Balance Scorecard, Scenario and Contingency Planning, Supply Chain Integration, Mass Customization, Six Sigma, and RFID. In the next session we shall describe them briefly. 2.1. Strategic planning System Lorange and Vancil (1977) in their work, Strategic planning System, make useful definitions of strategy, objectives and goals and put forward five pillars for planning, as follows: (1) Planning systems should help to formulate strategic choice, (2) Plans must be understood at all levels, communication, opinions interaction and iterations are to be stressed. (3) Plans have to be consistent in formats, method, deadlines so that confusion in planning reviews and consolidation can be minimized, (4) Planning system should be integrated with other management systems, and (5) Line mangers must be centrally involved in planning. However, in the last decade approaches to strategy has been changed and adopted as a new management paradigm. In addition, much attention is given to the role of new manager (Mintzberg, 1994; Porter, 1991). As Davidson described (1995) change management has its basis in leadership, shared purpose and values and the role of the manger as facilitator and coach. Today, strategic thinking offers managers and their companies the opportunity to move beyond the automatic application of traditional strategic frameworks to identify and to achieve breakthrough marketing strategies (Fodness, 2005). 2.2. Total quality management Total quality management has been stimulated by the need of firms to sustain unchanged quality of its products or services. The fundamental principle behind TQM is that management of quality is addressed at all levels of an organization. Luthans (1995) summarized TQM as being a participative system that empowers all to take responsibility for improving quality in the organization. Improvements are made on a continuous basis by applying the theories and approaches of managers in an attempt to improve quality and decrease costs (Hellsten, 2000). Recently, sustainability of values, tools and techniques as additional core value of the components of TQM are evaluated based on perspective of sustainable quality management, rather than tactical and operative ones (Svensson, 2006). 2.3. Knowledge management In the "new economic growth theory" various scholars shifted their focus from traditional, tangible capital assets in the neo-classical model to intangible knowledge assets accumulated through science and technology investments. Knowledge management has continued to generate an enormous amount of interest from the early 1990s, with some proponents contending that the knowledge-based view represents a fundamentally new theory of the firm (e.g., Nonaka and Takeuchi, 1995). Knowledge management is here defined as the management of tacit and explicit knowledge with the purpose of creating organizational learning innovation and sustainable competitive advantage through the use of information technology. Much of this debate began by distinguishing between information and knowledge and has subsequently delved into the meaning of knowledge, determining how knowledge is generated and disseminated, setting out the foundations of a knowledge-based theory of the firm, prescribing the adoption of a knowledge perspective and so forth (Nonaka, 1994; Kogut and Zander, 1992, 1993; Spender, 1996; Grant, 1996; Nonaka and Takeuchi, Teece, 1998, Nonaka and Teece, 2000). Acquiring managerial skills and technical know-how will further improve operational efficiency and enhance the competitiveness of organizations in Eastern Europe, ultimately improving living standards and broadening the market base which is currently constrained by poverty and high unemployment. 2.4. Customer relationship management -CRM Kotler and Armstorng (2004) define CRM as the overall process of building and maintaining profitable customer relationships by delivering superior customer value and satisfaction. Customer relationship management (CRM) is a process or methodology used to learn more about customers needs and behaviors in order to develop stronger relationships with them. CRM frequently employs IT technology as a means to attract, develop and retain customers (Lindgreen, et.al., 2005). However, CRM is not primarily technological term, but it consists on many components: key customer focus, CRM organization, knowledge management, and technology-based CRM (Sim et.al, 2005). Accurate customer data is essential to successful CRM performance and according to that fact, technology plays an important role in CRM as value added to organizational intelligence (Abbott et al.,2001). Although CRM is not primarily the information tool; it is associated with heavy investments in information technology that has not always proved their profitability (Compton, 2004). Still, investments in CRM have top priorities according to the Morgan Stanley CIO Survey (Zencke, 2004). 2.5. Business Process Reengineering Re-engineering is alternatively known as re-cyclin, reclamation, remarketing, de- manufacturing and has the various means by which product or components can be re-used. Hammer and Champy (1993) in their work recognized some frequent themes in re-engineering process such as worker participation in decision making is increased; there are fewer checks and controls; the work is done where it makes sense; and the steps in completing a process are done in a natural order. The different surveys existed in that field and they concluded that the introduction and implementation of process reengineering has produced mixed results (Stoddard et al., 1996) 2.6. Balanced scorecard system (BCS) Over the last decade there has been move toward a more balanced measurement process. Kaplan, Lowes and Norton developed the balanced scorecard system (BCS) (1996). The balanced scorecard seeks to assist business in clarifying their visions and strategies and provide them with a means by which they can be translated into action. The BSC is designed to link the data together in ways that produce better information and decisions across all levels of the organizations. The four perspectives of the BSC framework include: Financial - which includes metrics such as cost benefit analysis and financial risk assessment Internal business processes how well your core processes produce value People and knowledge- which seek to identify where employee training budget can be best deployed with the goal of ensuring continued individual and corporate improvement Customer This focuses on the analysis of customer satisfaction and different types of mechanisms for that. 2.7. Scenario and Contingency Planning The majority of todays production companies are subjected to the influence of an extremely dynamic, even turbulent environment (Schoemaker, 2002). Frequent, stormy and above all, unpredictable changes occur in such environments, whose causes and consequences are sometimes hard to find and relate. One tries to explain such environment and its influence on the business activities through theses of new scientific disciplines such as synergetic and theory of chaos (Gharajedaghi, 1999). Scenario management combines methods of systems thinking, future-open thinking and strategic thinking (Fink et al.;2000; Fink; 2002). A scenario is one of several future images that describe a future situation based on a significant number of consistent developments. The use of these scenarios in corporate or business planning is described as scenario management. Strategic contingency controlling is used in order to ensure that their strategy is always in line with the current developments of their industry, market, competitors and global situation. 2.8. Supply Chain Integration Both information and material flow from the supplier to the customer, through a manufacturing company. Although firms traditionally gave much attention to the flow of material, it has become important to firms to manage the supply chain in order to improve customer service, achieve a balance between costs and services, and thereby give a company a competitive advantage. At strategic, tactical and operational level the use of all of the firms resources have to be coordinated, which could be achieved in three phases: (1) evaluation of the competitive environment; (2) diagnostic review of the supply chain; (3) development of the supply chain, which involves functional integration, internal integration and finally external integration (Stevens, 1990). The sudden increase in electronic commerce and the Internet have resulted in new opportunities to improve the performance of the supply chain (Lankford, 2004). 2.9. Mass customization In the past, firms had to choose to produce either product specifically customized to the customer, or product that is standardized. The firms had to choose, to be large and standardized or small and customized. Therefore, the idea of mass customization is basically contradictive, because it allows firms to produce customized products to the large number of customers. Mass customization involves the production of mass produced, standard products, with slight variations for particular market or customer segments. According to Sean (1996) the customers now has been pushed to specify their exact requirements without extra charge for it. Pine (1993) cites five methods that firms should use in order to achieve mass customization: (1) customize services around standard products; (2) create customizable products; (3) provide point of delivery customization; (4) provide quick response; and (5) modularize components. 2.10. Six Sigma Researchers and consultants have tried to set criteria in which one six sigma methodology becomes a priority over the other for current processes and products. Current literature presents growth and investment of six sigma in industry. It is focused on improving processes by eliminating variation using a well-structured methodology. The main objectives of six sigma is to reduce potential variability from processes and products by using either a continuous improvement methodology or a design/redesign approach known as design for six sigma (DFSS). The former follows the phases: define, measure, analyse, improve and control.(Bauelas et.al.,2004) 2.11. RFID RFID is a short term for Radio Frequency Identification. This technology uses devices attached to objects (e.g. products) that transmit data to an RFID receiver. Back in the 90-s RFID technology was novel and promising but with high costs of implementation (Byfield, 1996). Today, RFID is used as an alternative to bar coding. Its advantages are large data capacity, read/write capability, and no line-of-sight requirements. Its disadvantage is today the same as ten years ago high investment costs. 3. Research approach Survey research on using intelligent management tools in Croatian firms was carried out in December, 2005 on a random sample of 200 firms by mail. The questionnaire was mailed to the sample firms, among with 53 firms participated in the survey. In each selected firm the interviewed person was determined to be involved with strategic decision making. In small companies the interviewee was at least information manager or the owner of the firm. For this quantitative survey research a special questionnaire for applying the method of mail interviewing was designed. The goals of the survey were to estimate familiarity of Croatian firms with intelligent management tools, and to compare the results with the survey on usage of the same tools in world-wide companies (Bain, 2005). Intelligent management tools in Croatian firms In this part of the paper familiarity, usage and satisfaction of Croatian managers with intelligent tools is presented. Croatian managers are rather familiar with intelligent management tools (Table 1). The most familiar intelligent management tool is Strategic Planning (86,7%). It is closely followed by Total Quality Management (71,7%), Knowledge Management (69,8%), Customer Relationship Management (67,9%), and Business Process Reengineering (66%). Other tools are familiar to less than half of the managers in the sample. Table 1. Number of respondents that are familiar with the tool Number of firms% in total number of firmsStrategic Planning4686,8%Total Quality Management 3871,7%Knowledge Management3769,8%Customer Relationship Management3667,9%Business Process Reengineering 3566,0%Balance Scorecard2445,3%Scenario and Contingency Planning 2037,7%Supply Chain Integration1935,8%Mass Customization1528,3%Six Sigma713,2%RFID47,5% The usage of intelligent management tools can give us feeling of where do executives strategic priorities lie (Table 2). Usage of intelligent management tools in Croatian firms indicates that their managers are oriented to three things: future, customers, and quality. Croatian managers most intensively think about the future. Strategic planning is their preoccupation (69,8%), but they do not use Scenario and Contingency Planning too often. However, they are ready to reorganize itself with the Business Process Reengineering (28,3%). Based on high usage and satisfaction with Customer Relationship Management (39,6%) both with Knowledge Management (35,8%), Croatian managers obviously think about customers, how to acquire them, keep them, learn more about what they want, and satisfy their needs. Global economy turned the whole world into the one marketplace. Strong competition forces the firms not only to monitor the customers, but also to take care on the quality of its products. Based on high usage of Total Quality Management (28,3%), Croatian managers are following the trend. However, in the same time they rarely not use Six Sigma method in obtaining that goal. Table 2. Number of respondents that use the tool Number of firms% in total number of firmsStrategic Planning3769,8%Customer Relationship Management2139,6%Knowledge Management1935,8%Business Process Reengineering 1528,3%Total Quality Management 1528,3%Supply Chain Integration815,1%Balance Scorecard713,2%Scenario and Contingency Planning 611,3%Six Sigma11,9%Mass Customization11,9%RFID00,0% Respondents were asked to evaluate intelligent management tools with score from 1 to 5, where 1 means Not at all satisfied, and 5 means Very satisfied. The average satisfaction scores for each tools are presented in the Table 3. Croatian managers are most satisfied with Knowledge management (3,9), which is closely followed by four tools: Strategic Planning (3,73), Total Quality Management (3,72), Customer Relationship Management (3,67), and Business Process Reengineering (3,53). Other tools have score lower than 3,5. It is important to note that none of the tools gained score higher than 4, and in the same time none of the tools gained score lower than 2. This means that Croatian managers are in general moderately satisfied with the intelligent tools that were subject of this paper. Table 3. Average satisfaction with the tool MeanStandard DeviationKnowledge Management3,901,18Strategic Planning3,730,93Total Quality Management 3,721,23Customer Relationship Management3,670,96Business Process Reengineering 3,531,12Supply Chain Integration3,181,08Balance Scorecard3,151,41Scenario and Contingency Planning 3,001,34Six Sigma2,601,52Mass Customization2,601,52RFID2,001,00 Figure 1. compare familiarity, usage and satisfaction of Croatian managers with intelligent management tools. On the left side of the figure there is scale for familiarity and usage which range from 0 to 100%. On the right side of the figure there is scale for satisfaction which range from 0 to 4,5. It is obvious that there is clear connection between satisfaction and familiarity. The most familiar tools gained higher scores, and vice versa. However, some tools have rather low usage and are in the same time highly scored. One example is Total Quality Management, and other is Knowledge Management. These are probably the future stars which usage will increase in the near future.  Figure 1. Comparison of familiarity, usage and satisfaction of Croatian managers with intelligent management tools Comparison with world wide firms The results of our survey will be compared with the survey that is conducted with the number of world-wide firms (Bain, 2005). This survey will be shortly described. In 1993, Bain launched a multi-year research project to get the facts about management tools and trends. Their objective is two-fold: (1) Provide managers with information they need to identify and integrate tools that will improve bottom-line results, and (2) Understand how global executives view their strategic challenges and priorities. Over the past 12 years, they have completed 10 surveys, assembling a database that now includes 7,283 respondents from more than 70 countries in North America, Europe, Asia, Africa, the Middle East and Latin America. In 2005, they received 960 completed surveys from a broad range of international executives. They also conducted personal follow-up interviews to further probe the circumstances under which tools are most likely to produce desired results. At first sight, intelligent management tools are more used in world-wide companies compared to Croatia. This is true for all of the tools. However, the difference is rather low for most popular tools: Knowledge Management, and Strategic Planning. On the other side, the difference is especially high for Supply Chain Integration, Mass Customization, Six Sigma. This could be explained by the fact that in Croatia there are very few firms that follow cutting-edge technology in production, and all of the mentioned tools are typical for production firms. In addition, RFID is not used in any of the Croatian firms.  Figure 2. Usage of tool in Croatian and world wide firms (Bain, 2005) Croatian managers are in most of the cases less satisfied with intelligent tools compared to world-wide managers. The only one exception is Knowledge Management that is widely used in Croatian firms, and that has better satisfaction score in Croatia compared to world-wide firms. Again, the most popular tools have rather similar satisfaction score in both Croatian firms and world-wide firms: Total Quality Management, Business Process Reengineering, Customer Relationship Management, and Strategic Planning. On the other side, Supply Chain Integration, Mass Customization, Six Sigma and Scenario and Contingency Planning got rather low satisfaction scores in Croatian firms compared to world-wide firms.  Figure 3. Satisfaction with tools in Croatian and world wide firms (Bain, 2005) 4. Conclusion In the circumstances of restricted available factors and present conditions of business operation, results can be primarily improved by an adequate management. Various solutions are available to improve the quality of management while one important improvement of business is provided by a suitable information support of business, its management and basic processes. Intelligent management tools show mixed results. On the one side of the story there are most popular tools, and on the other there are the least popular tools. Two important questions are: (1) Why is particular intelligent management tools often used or not used, and (2) What influence has particular intelligent management tools to the performance of the firm. Management tools and techniques have certainly not been used to the best advantage within company. Although those that have been correctly applied and have provided significant benefits this is believed to be due the lack of middle management understanding and acceptance. Aligning strategy within company is people, processes and technology typically requires significant change in all areas of the organizations. There is tendency to continue old practice regardless of their efficiency. However, people do not resist the all change. Instead, what people resist is the personal threat posed by a specific change in the workplace (Burke (1982). The degree of resistance to change, therefore, depends on the kind of change involved and how well the perceived threat to the employees is managed. Resistance is likely when users perceive new technologies as threatening. Therefore, it is not surprising that leaders have great difficulty implementing the managerial tools and get the commitment of followers to it. 5. References Bain Company (2005). http:// HYPERLINK "http://www.bain.com/managemetn_tools/home.asp" www.bain.com/managemetn_tools/home.asp Bauelas, R.; Antony, J.(2004) Six sigma or design for six sigma?The TQM Magazin, Vol 16, No 4 pp.250-263 Burke,W.W. (1982) Organizational Development: Principles and Practices, Little Brown, Boston, MA Byfield, I. (1996). Developments in RFID. Sensor Review, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp 4-5. Compton, J. (2004), "CRM gets real", Customer Relationship Management, Vol. 8 No.5, pp 11-12. Davidson, M. (1995). The Transformation of Management, Macmillan Business Press, London. Fink, A. (2002), "Scenarios to plan", in Ringland, G. (Eds),Scenarios in Business, Wiley, Chichester, . Fink, A., Schlake, O. (2000), "Scenario management an approach for strategic foresight", Competitive Intelligence Review, Vol. 11 No.1, pp.37-45. Fodness, D. (2005). Rethinking strategic marketing: achieving breakthrough results, Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 26., No. 3, pp 20 34. Gharajedaghi, J. (1999). Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity A Platform for Designing Business Architecture, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MA. Grant, R.M. (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 109-122. Hammer, M., Champy, J. (1993), Reengineering the Corporation, Harper Business, New York, NY. Hellsten, U., Klefsjo, M. (2000), "TQM as a management system consisting of values, techniques and tools", The TQM Magazine, Vol. 12 No.4, pp 238-44. Kaplan, R.; Lowes, A.; Norton, D.P. (1996) : Balanced Scorrecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Watertown, MA: Harvard Business School Press, Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3: 383-397. Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1993) Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24: 625-645. Kotler, P., Armstrong, G. (2004), Principles of Marketing, 10th ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Lankford, W.M. (2004). Supply chain management and the Internet. Online Information Review, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp 301-305. Lindgreen, A., Antioco, M. (2005). Customer relationship management: the case of a European bank. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. Vol. 23, No. 2, pp 136-154. Malhotra, Y.: Role of Information Technology In Managing Orgaizational Change and Organizational Interdependence,  HYPERLINK http://www.brint.com/papers/change/ http://www.brint.com/papers , 1999. McQuarter .R.E.; Scurr, C.H. Dale, B.G. Hillman, P.G. (1995) Using quality tools and techniques successfully, The TQM Magazin, Vol.7, No.6. pp. 37-42. Mintzberg, H. (1994), The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, Financial Times/Prentice-Hall, London, . Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995) The Knowledge Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press. Nonaka, I. and Teece, D. (2001) Managing Industrial Knowledge. London: Sage. Porter, M. E. 1991. Towards a dynamic theory of strategy, Strategic Management Journal, 12: 95-117. Reh, F.J. (2005), "Key performance indicators (KPI)", available at: http://management.about.com/cs/generalmanagement/a/keyperfindic_p.htm Rigby D. and Bilodeau, B (2005) The Bain 2005 Mangement tool survey, Strategy& Leadership, Vol.33 No.4 pp 4-12. Schoemaker, P.J.H. (2002), Profiting from Uncertainty: Strategies for Succeeding No Matter What the Future Brings, Free Press, New York, NY. Sean, K. (1996) Data Warehousing: The Route to Mass Customization, Chichester, John Wiley. Sharif, A.M. (2006). Realizing the business benefits of enterprise IT. Handbook of Business Strategy, Vol.7, No.1, pp 347 350. Sim, L.Y.M. Tse, A.C.B., Yim, F.H.K. (2005). CRM: conceptualization and scale development. European Journal of Marketing. Vol. 39, No. 11/12, pp 1264 1290. Singh, H., Motwani, J., Kumar, A. (2000), "A review and analysis of the state-of-the-art research on productivity measurement", Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 100 No.5, pp.234-41. Spender, J-C. (1996) Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2): 45-62. Stevens, G.C. (1990). Successful Supply-Chain Management. Management Decision. Vol. 28, No. 8, pp 28-32. Stoddard, D.B., Jarvenpaa, S.L., Littlejohn, M. (1996), "The reality of business reengineering", California Management Review, Vol. 38 pp.57-76. Svensson, G. (2006). Sustainable quality management: a strategic perspective. The TQM Magazine. Vol. 18. No. 1, pp 22-29. Teece, D. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Review, 40(3): 55-79. Zencke, P. (2004), "CRM after the hype: from front office to one office", P @ n p  ~re~W~rLBBhuaJmHsHh)xhumHsHh)xhu0J]mHsHjhuU]h)xhu]mHsHjhuU]h)xhu]mH sH  hu] h)xhuhu7jhu0J56CJOJQJU\]^JmHsH0huhu56CJOJQJ\]^JmHsH0h)xhu56CJOJQJ\]^JmHsHhphker5 hu5 Z 0 @ n  D p  D $ ! ^ `a$gdu $ 0*$a$gdu$a$gdu$a$gduh^hgdker7O\   3 4 B C D E F V W  "  huw  !#½xxxtxm hph h7hi hph hphP h :N@hph@ hph7$ hph h" hphH3\ hphhph 5 h$rK5 hker5huhker5mHsHhxhhuaJmHsHh)xhu0JmHsHjhuUh)xhumHsH*D E W   12$d`a$gdwm $da$gd@7! $da$gdEK$a$gd\ C $da$gdwm$a$gdE$a$gdker$a$gdu`lv}  !qrw|ļ hphim3 hphki hphq-hki hph7$huhEKh[KhVhH3\hphp5hph 5 h5 hphuh hphh[= hphH3\h=X hph hphhF;h h72,j; ^1R8>rsɻ~zzvzrzhQhG6hT[ hphEKh! hphCj'h4h>h?hEch0Hh; hph\ Ch\ ChchZ8 hAh\ C hAhW| hAh; hAhLhAhh/RhD"x h;h; hph hphim3hki,O)*0127PQxskf h5hph5 hD5hph 5 hphim3h/ZhQ.h/;ht. hphEK hEKhEKhEKhu hphhze h^gh0ph h?hUhhh)hPthNhKVhRh5Ihc[h#th2qh*9,h{hI$2QR!!$$<$=$N'O'l'm'J)K)+,)-$a$gd $|d^`|a$gd $da$gd $0d^`0a$gd $a$gdwm $7$8$H$a$gdE@$a$gdE$a$gdc+/dgdwmQRlz{  E K !!@!A!E!F!!!!!!!!!!""""4"C"u"v"w"x"y"""""""""3#黴{ h(\hjthlJ!h$9 h(\hq- h(\hN h(\h2 h(\hu h(\hlv h(\hP h(\h3h3 huhPh0hhkh0Hh,]hdhc+/ huhu huh7$ hph7$hpht.503#4#<#W#]####### $ $$$$#$;$<$=$U$v$$$$+%%%P&a&c&m&&&&&&;'='M'zsle h6t{h6t{ h6t{hHp h6t{hj h6t{h" h6t{hPWA h6t{h h6t{hH2v h UhH2vhQh(hhuhH3\hhSh h h hu5 hb5h h 5 hD5 hph hth]9 h(\hdhfAhhE@ h(\hE'M'N'O'R'W'm'I)K)*2*3*+,(-)-*-,-1-R-S-W-X- ..5.8.E.Y...//1/2/9}:::::Ͼ|v h UaJh;hF h,h Jh# J hDh; h]5 hphuhEKh hph hdW7hph 5 h'5hlhl]hl hlhl hlha3h hlhI% hI%5hI%hI%5 hD5 ha35*6#7k78888::<<<<x@y@@@B $da$gd $da$gdp $da$gd) $ed`ea$gd;$0d^`0a$gd $da$gdu$ & F pd^`a$gd :;;<,<-<9<<<<<<<<<<<<<=H=W=d=e=======U>̽zsle^WP h5U hQ h5U h+P h5U h& h5U hq hsJhq hsJh#f hsJh%< hsJh hsJhI( hsJh hsJh hsJhV h5 ha'L5 h]5h)h t5aJh)h]aJ h JaJ h)aJhh)h)56\]aJh)h)\]aJ h:aJh)h)aJU>V>>>>>>?????@e@g@v@w@x@y@~@@@@B]BdBBBBBBBBCCȳ|wslhllhd`dhY h(Dh6hTJhlhm hmhmh hu5 h 5 hm5 h^&{5 h0x5h[ACJOJQJ^JaJ hh# hhD hh Sc h Sch Sc h Sch$0 h Schk h SchD2 h5U hD2 h5U h_ h5U hS< h5U h8` h5U hr h5U hNj h5U h]"BB0D1DADBDFFFFHHHHII%K&KKK.L & Fgd{Wgd* $a$gd* gd.` $da$gd($a$gd $da$gd/ $da$gd<{ $da$gdmCC#C)C6C`CsCxCCCCCCCDD0D1D3D5D7D@DADBD-E.EEEEEFFFFFFFFFļzuzpkf h45 hVq] h] hs\]hh]hhVq] hhVqh) hVqhVqh)CJOJQJ^JaJ h)h)h hhh h5 h/5h h.g;5h h8T5h he 5h/h<{ hA h(Dh6h1{h0h)&FFFFFFGG$GGGUGoG~GGGGGGGH$H7HJHHHHHHHHHHHHHKK.LLÿ{sohcsh h{W5 hph* h.`hph* 5hph 5 hS45 hl5 h3?h(h2)h!h$4hnhI h3?h3?h3?hh8h^ h5thX[,h jh] h(h@doha6hahch&h~h/h hPx5h hra5&.L/LLLCNDNNNNNN $IfgdPgd*  LLLLLL~NNPPPPTTVVW8WSTTTmh```````hh$a$gd%?cgd* kdt $$IfFs!""#06    34ab  TTTTUU*U-U3U_kd= $$IfF """06    34ab  $IfgdPgd* 3U4UUUXU^Umddd $IfgdPkd $$IfF ""#06    34ab ^U_UtUwU}Umddd $IfgdPkd $$IfF ""#06    34ab }U~UUUUmddd $IfgdPkd $$IfF ""#06    34ab UUUUUmddd $IfgdPkd[ $$IfF ""#06    34ab UUUUUmddd $IfgdPkd$$$IfF ""#06    34ab UUVV Vmddd $IfgdPkd$$IfF ""#06    34ab  V V/V1V7Vmddd $IfgdPkd$$IfF ""#06    34ab 7V8VBVDVIVmddd $IfgdPkd$$IfF ""#06    34ab IVJV]V_VdVmddd $IfgdPkdH$$IfF ""#06    34ab dVeVjVlVqVmddd $IfgdPkd$$IfF ""#06    34ab qVrVsV]W^WXXYYYYmh`````hhh$a$gd%?cgd* kd$$IfF ""#06    34ab  YYYYYYYYekd$$IfF & &&0    34ab  $IfgdPYYZZZneee $IfgdPkds$$IfF & ''0    34ab ZZ7ZlFlUllnnnnoooo(o)o*o;oq^qqqGrfrrr(sss t:tWtttttuuj'*1MSfQAr;%@ "ȫQT?ue*8e.Ėz#v]V ,{wq D|/QF?]Ʋo%b?=^{T&S,?kߝ_wnOC9`\'> q̲r_3SΌʱ(.S^6I>+Oi͌͜N\Nϱ#̱W2ߖmiu17)_$ϔ˔׫]E.y<"#_*;i]4Lr,sB3YhJw9>}Ptk]x<,im3t 3iiy}#mկ/):UrÅV$ϊd+ cu?2~1Mu} .1t]9O0 ϒ|MtƟՌ_`V2i_-2z8}G){#m`.6 C$2ߊc,Gwآ`'mؠާac!&^%44 Ч aF-"8/=uLSLיg:b:2eLֱP&Xt4y]W].E׽Kql|9s.=s %`JEasn%:<کٜ?Zl=#k%k-u`7Nѩ,S׭LQ spuĹ)\Ñ[)|6+d(us|?[i~uICsbVeJOG{9 πORDZ2X[McxhcIOO)::8WñLVH[Vʨ9e2:58qQ0d|T䅲Y١Qs;\?eЖ-#r;BVކ8}0,]eOe=?q.:F5AFBi[Jpt9becU$YeuBE1,gYz{k3 zFz73 '!?E2/273J_w1]?g0~T835Ssz#Kq*Ys>W&Θq\gZV:w:Qvd9>j01_;3,g,P`Fthz Hr @è6zd@7Aèõ6ZdY% f~z ًi]O얋^rQ?=kYc,z[עaO5kmx-FO?\[-_"YJ~ x/)w ,YN~Yz}+;;|LJlGnݨyO= >01%Ly-5?heUb ^Uoj[Mmtou0roK~0fS~,?͋v~]9ڝ ~e*j @:b'*RXdSeK,ryG'L8_ 0=0a`xR.nsh Ku5 m{!0̦{-0|JkN 3{<oWp6z``m ־vF kX?۩ߪZi{Wq=-U^6#6a5j=Kd+ бsLcco7ict7v΂kz_ٿ"Y>Z~@W4OY0[`m&kzZ~}OֆX[ꁵ/S.XkK}[+V泯3S K9|jpuٳs,:ho~Um{_LmN]]WwC mtۢed@0bYt7[ˮ8L یAcr%.&#v=/Z|7i E4 }Df .}DKh>b{T}>GN ?NOtZgd{pܛrc8O /mS6 0|a84ß`Z 19<0|T:fw{X]+:Fe?1wdcKޓߛH>vsS}ts}p/z3r8my f܋$K\ݽkf>ݧnVp,g'بxg'>43eD82!E#‘KG>2?C2sI234 s$#.JvIsN9F2~,S]dN29lwGX!Dv}~K~7Fv\4_kmzO:jgM wXAok.{{˶[Y< C@}ms[El{mrZkz?+wv$=`g9avtׯΧ>p-rnc3=ܾG,}-poe9{мtJYFDCUOL#0/͞/Ufneu-5 7Jة_8㦻{(űJy^@u%*BV Dd ,xhh0  # A" S VXYyn+f .@= S VXYyn+f. KmsKt xZ}lUEPż",]?vʆH%UHV4)_>ڵCPQ~A7Ū!k5 D 3sӹݲmkN;̙3gfν3Z) \T :V*o~ J loJ5i.HLK)Pn55@AM xT'BVPM"u5M(W5FWh⺦L T\Py``@Md=(;7~N< %\/49`s]1g9FzF#7-FMWCzO]`OS9U킛>+@:))CTEha?Ο{-̢/Osc|5=shM S?$C?- ڠ_%U%p'c|,MT?G b;`ݮn\T(42=r8]I[||~Q`=IĚwo5咬}ھ|VZ73X34stdz@nЎ|^v,RW|3WoY@L|>cfE+ %#@b1G%PF:0ܵ$xP>lx.M;K#Ns9@&)e3 : ƈ^ @?r +nzL\ wVy}V#u@/&bEj6q<rǴ+?CHu&.6F9.8A|Ix~sym6F@,mco\~) ʫ )+_ <Gȏu18sy[ޏtL.`{%xp1с9hjmjU!nQhR/I~-CΣeaf؍TVoVz \7n;C1jt/il DZ-Oa^HMMi [m5ІjOng#&"nv8&ƎM }}-& V3*}FؾvзOVM`+vNkoكC>k31}fv~o-'#tص1vЛ7U;[{M|LD~ڃ o&B;D;6<Դ ۃђyZ^r+- 1&c'#&(VY/r6=NnVm`FcO2b8c$6|,ژ6#|u_dK8}+ bJ^bC~[Sp}j`3}<dzM~pN]]3v7P`jvlW×khy ьז3r5rlo ⫛Co0vwvXpmo"cKҳ+3w!Iq{@{v%9,+]7x&ZK R z&`F}Oc Dd ~'0  # A"> vs  s8@= vs p+aMxZoh\UwM3Ӥۦ0j@navVECC@mBl] bEH]-[Z .ҖB~q FRbAes߹/gN{3&m&y{=}>kogYߧydLWl6ƚ58 e~t"0MAv5?G{1u䗸lg,+0M][W!jB]ʸGUַw5DDV3^)En)ځ;q3HOuMU+3F!kFٴUzI}ɓ'W1cAJ׏E'QmTӂ6M%Cm|OMO*Is\siϯ%aq&azqqG*Eſ~v.6IJ4w5dNяCL?A=.78ՅbFe6iH=>=9j6aJ#iH=d G䇀="d CUYH۞ux *v `m$npX YB{$'A%LV8`&}Nz7dsazͧ |#/lTPa g/([x^-[lt _ ld>P ]_cʷ957/(~Sa\+[xފ[T\_.wC 8/!hYn7 ]B߆Z# ;V5OYfF!/ǽ ڽ8;hvo^پQڷ9gh7H)S絤nho}o;'R/YS $׊\ .9x)s8eӲeP?f@>Wup^9싩Eύ*d~T)xqWyY˸| '{ߔ}e<q'ֳ7}.YGߤ0 w8rSrw\j w[}^`.枙3s#2_]f甉I9% _tW^qܓ +t|u;)tT#\s\8.R{1:'soa1$[[GoIk9o*I6f~ߜ?mfb}e?JzDyK 'www.bain.com/managemetn_tools/home.aspyK \http://www.bain.com/managemetn_tools/home.aspDyK $http://www.brint.com/papers/change/yK Hhttp://www.brint.com/papers/change/DyK www.crm2day.comyK 0http://www.crm2day.com/@@@ NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tHh@h u Heading 2$<@&,56CJOJQJ\]^JaJmH sH tH DA@D Default Paragraph FontRi@R  Table Normal4 l4a (k(No ListLP@L k Body Text 2 d1$aJmH sH tH hR@h Body Text Indent 2, uvlaka 2dx^6U@6 EK Hyperlink >*B*phP@"P uHeader !5$7$8$9DH$ aJmH sH >@2> u Footnote TextCJaJ@&@A@ uFootnote ReferenceH*\^@R\ Z$q Normal (Web)!$ii&dPfa$mHsHjcj l Table Grid7:V0HrH P Balloon TextCJOJQJ^JaJXSxSx LZdy 7yz{DEW 12QR<=NOlmJK!")#*#+#,#W#X#%%''(****,#-k-....002222x6y666880:1:A:B:<<<<>>>>??%A&AAA.B/BBBCDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDE EEE3E6EIJJJJJJKK*K-K3K4KUKXK^K_KtKwK}K~KKKKKKKKKKKKKLL L L/L1L7L8LBLDLILJL]L_LdLeLjLlLqLrLsL]M^MNNOOOOOOOOOOOOPPPP7PCFLCho8y9]ADFGHJKLNOQRTUW}D 2)-6B.LNNNO?@ABCD''""l'l'6W>W>WDWLW]WoWXXZZ\\eerfvfvffgggiiirjvjvj|kkkkkkkDmDm#n2p2pAppppppppprr$stfvfvwwTx  !#"$&%')(*,-+./0123456879:;<=>?@ABCD=DD*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceTypeZCC*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceNamehttp://www.5iantlavalamp.com/h::*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsCity0http://www.5iamas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags9((*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsState_AA*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagscountry-regionhttp://www.5iantlavalamp.com/VEE*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplacehttp://www.5iantlavalamp.com/>@@*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PersonName EDCEA@EAE@E:EE@EEEEEAEAEAE:E:(EE:EE:(E:(E:(ECCDE:@E:EE(ECDEE:E(E@E(E(LXdn  cw4B RY^dy +2RZ=E-3|!!!!!!!!!!!!!!,#/#X#^#c#l#%"%$%)%%%%%''2(8(((+++/5/}00<<<<==eeeeeeeeefffyffgggggggghhii'j-jxjjjjk kEkOkkkkk9l>lGlMlllmmmmlntnnn7o@oHoMooooo7p=pppppNqQqqqJrTrs$s2s8sssssss\tct vvvvw www-xExExGxGxHxHxJxKxMxNxPxQxTxLY #cx{C ,#1#$%+%&&1 11:@:; ;<<CCECCCDDLDGG*H,HHH.J0JyJJJJ8M=MMMNNOONQWQXQ_QwRyRT TYYZZ]]gghhnn2p5prrrr-xExExGxGxHxHxJxKxMxNxPxQxTx3333333333333333333333333333333333333LZFW"= M  64Om,#0#X#**,,1:7:<<>>}?ABMDDF#GJJsLOOONQQR_SSSxTTZ[]5^D^^___aa3bbccc@dde*eyff)g>ghhijxj8l9llQmhmmmmm,nkno7ppppMqqJr2sGsysstPtQtu uuuuvvvwwwww-x/xDxExExGxGxHxHxJxKxMxNxPxQxTx,#/#-xExExGxGxHxHxJxKxMxNxPxQxTxmdabic b#~ZM!(A/iq?|rr`q&F2dQ^c.`Trh<_jo<_pp|3xR ^`.^`.pp^p`.@ @ ^@ `.^`.^`.^`.^`.PP^P`. hh^h`o(hH. P^`PhH.. ^`hH... x^`xhH....  ^`hH .....  X@ ^ `XhH ......  ^ `hH.......  8x^`8hH........  `H^``hH.........hpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhPP^P`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJPJQJ^JhH.h ^`hH.h pLp^p`LhH.h @ @ ^@ `hH.h ^`hH.h L^`LhH.h ^`hH.h ^`hH.h PLP^P`LhH.hh^h`o(.hh^h`o(..0^`0o(...0^`0o(.... 88^8`o( ..... 88^8`o( ...... `^``o(....... `^``o(........ ^`o(.........h ^`hH.h ^`hH.h pLp^p`LhH.h @ @ ^@ `hH.h ^`hH.h L^`LhH.h ^`hH.h ^`hH.h PLP^P`LhH.h^`OJPJQJ^Jo(hH.^`o(..808^8`0o(...808^8`0o(.... ^`o( ..... ^`o( ...... `^``o(....... `^``o(........ pp^p`o(.........h^`OJPJQJ^Jo(hH.^`o(..808^8`0o(...808^8`0o(.... ^`o( ..... ^`o( ...... `^``o(....... `^``o(........ pp^p`o(.........^`CJOJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(opp^p`CJOJQJo(@ @ ^@ `CJOJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(PP^P`CJOJQJo(h^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hH A/M!(3xjoTrhq?q&Fppb#Q^c l2l2D>z`ez`k&,:Fr]);z*])e\-d :CBNQ-jEe\-NQJIo`e\-Cjr,:Frr}tD> W~.XzT[_'_ 1sJ|5g  I 5U v ] F N    VM i = : "! 6 %< ^ ze <{ jikiv2* !$Yz7$Lf .dMQ[QoR~@b'2CsWaofup6TTpu $eA|9~,{-02.7Shla6 E.H{W3o||B @7!lJ!"7b""1#F#>$I%g%w%y%&2 ''Cj'C(.]()-).,*2+3e+*9,X[,\,h,^-) .W$.Q.t./&/*/c+/]/p/50$0(1I1k1-2D2a33+3im3.y34S4c5 i5 6446O6S7dW7 h719]9/;F;e;.g;S<`<I|<>">Wz>? !?Bp?8@fAPWA0ZA"wBB\ CDDa&ESEW F|GH5I,IyI# J!J.J7CJTJjbJ yJEK[K$rKLa'L/]LN :NF_N~-O-O6O>OdQOWO`vOrPXPcP*Q#Qhmh/i;EiRia j jkknk-lwm?no@dop0pHpfsp~pqZ$qdYqrrker5s#t't5tPtjtiRuuuH2vD"xWx]y)y7yelyz>z|z^&{1{6t{| +|Q|4}9} ~LUusqz2 "(\kk( 05WEIW|?v> !#W'2NURx[\Hs 2):Afw 28D0Hm(MnipraZ8Qr]CitGUbPCf&O,Ufy;'K)]@ '086AK%#8@NVq[AQb|aaE@BL\f;)7alMs7}} u~4c)Jt W9~C);V7[ RUULOKVvgP,'4(D$45cL!WM0(y{U"D!  Xz5??dlH JklCsK U]m"$9}R -6 &q-by_,v+P:>ZCVIi kL?YTAI(+7_90x)-XL^g)Dc[,,92qCX3?v!|dn3[=V>(DHi/LEc y<7UbA -&-;APj',L_olvs91\Px<2ke 4G6/Zv 7r;IO!( t D ;5k"GHU>/RdNjjz`'8SeEP^JhB =4al]r ?_}u3ECv|y+#!)jpNQ80)l4 @ 6BV`h ,#'x6y6CDDDDDDDDDDDDDDE EEE3E6Ef=>f=4dww 2qHX ?kSOver the last decade there has been move toward a more balanced measurement process Administratormdabic4         Oh+'0 ,8H Xd    TOver the last decade there has been move toward a more balanced measurement processverAdministratordedmidmiNormaltmdabict4abMicrosoft Word 10.0@ԭ@B)]&@'@_'>f՜.+,D՜.+,@ hp  sfsbm=w{ TOver the last decade there has been move toward a more balanced measurement process Title 8@ _PID_HLINKSA@06 http://www.crm2day.com/0d $http://www.brint.com/papers/change/4.http://www.bain.com/managemetn_tools/home.asp*mailto:mpejic@efzg.hrhmailto:marina.dabic@sfsb.hr  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry Fg'Data D1TableZWordDocument. SummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjj  FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q