Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 260584
Law in Transition and Selective Perception
Law in Transition and Selective Perception // u pripremi / Arnold, Reiner (ur.).
Regensburg: Unversitaet Regensburg, 2006. str. 0-0 (pozvano predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 260584 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Law in Transition and Selective Perception
Autori
Rodin, Siniša
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni
Izvornik
U pripremi
/ Arnold, Reiner - Regensburg : Unversitaet Regensburg, 2006, 0-0
Skup
VIII. International Congress on European Constitutional Law
Mjesto i datum
Regensburg, Njemačka, 23.06.2006. - 24.06.2006
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Pozvano predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
constitutional law; transition; harmonization; perception
Sažetak
The main proposition of the first part of the paper is that constitutional mandate of legal monism that is enshrined in the Croatian constitution is replaced by dualist practice of legislative branch and public administration. I will first explain how Croatian constitution, and Croatian courts deal with application of international law in general. I will proceed elaborating how association law, primary and secondary, is understood in the European union and in some candidate countries. Finally, I will discuss political practice and emerging doctrine in Croatia. In doing so I will deal with the relevant elements of the Stabilization and Association Agreement concluded between European Community and its Member States on one side and Croatia, on the other. In my concluding remarks I will criticize the emerging practice according to which the more precise an international obligations is, the more dualistic approach towards its implementation is applied. In the second part I will focus on two parliamentary practices that have cristallized from the 1990 onwards, namely, the practice of so-called authentic interpretation, and practice of stringent control of governmental action, especially in external relations domain. Both practices, I submitt, can be explained by a number of factors, such as, insufficient legislative framework, post-communist inertia and selective perception of key political actors, or specific political landscape. As such practices are significantly impairing ability of Croatia to integrate into decision-making structures of the European Union, they will, arguably, have to be changed before accession.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo
