ࡱ> tvsq`k`bjbjqPqP 7~::4XXXX\ 12 !!!0000000$2hN51i(!"!((1XX %n1***(X8  0*(0**-. FFD)^-K/101-,54*5.5.<!#D* % &!!!11*!!!1((((`d`XXXXXX Is there a demand for science communication courses? The experience of the Croatian Medical Journal Dario Sambunjak Croatian Medical Journal, Zagreb University School of Medicine, Salata 3b, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; dsambunj@mef.hr Ana Ivanis Croatian Medical Journal, Zagreb University School of Medicine, Salata 3b, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; aivanis@mef.hr Abstract Background. The editors of the Croatian Medical Journal introduced short courses to provide training in planning scientific research and writing scientific articles for local authors. Methods. Practice-oriented, hands-on courses were conducted in Croatian. The main outcome measure was the number of attendees and their satisfaction with the course, assessed through answers to a questionnaire (1 totally unsatisfied to 5 totally satisfied). Scientific output of course participants (n=85) was assessed by the number of those who published in Pubmed-indexed journals, and compared with their self-indicated peer controls (n=76). Results. Fourteen courses have been conducted since 2002, with a total of more than 300 attendees. The average scores were 4.50.2 for the usefulness of the courses, 4.50.2 for their interest, 4.50.1 for information provided, and 4.40.1 for the style of presentation. There was no significant difference in the proportion of participants and non-participants who published at least one paper, either before (P=0.146; -test), or after the course (P=0.156; -test). Conclusion. The interest in courses in planning scientific research and writing scientific articles among medical professionals in developing and transitional countries is considerably high. Such courses should be established and conducted locally, using personal contacts as the primary means of advertising. Introduction Good research reports from developing, transitional, and newly emerged countries are recognized as an important contribution to solving global health problems [1]. Nevertheless, obtaining high-quality manuscripts from authors in these countries is not an easy task [2, 3]. As the editors of an international medical journal representing a small scientific community, we are painfully aware of the problems that arise from insufficient training of authors in scientific writing [5]. In order to avoid losing valid scientific data only because of poor presentation, the editors of the Croatian Medical Journal (CMJ) introduced an author-friendly policy [4]. That policy was a curative measure, but it became obvious that preventive measures could be equally, if not more important. The CMJ therefore introduced a 2-day workshop entitled How to Plan and Write in Medical Research, with the purpose of educating physicians in the basics of research planning and writing a scientific paper. Our intention was to teach local authors how to prepare their research reports according to the high professional standards, so that the reports have more chance to get published in international journals. The CMJ workshops were preceded by five short courses held by distinguished journal editors and researchers from the international scientific community. The groundbreaking first workshop was given by Elisabeth Heseltine of EASE in 1997 [1]. Three years later we organized a 3-day course on medical writing and publishing, with the participation of three senior editors from The Lancet and the co-convener of the Cochrane Collaboration's Quality Improvement Advisory Group. In 2001, for a workshop entitled Scientific Communication in Biomedicine, we were again privileged to have colleagues from The Lancet and Cochrane Collaboration as speakers, this time joined by representatives of BiomedCentral and the Office for Research Integrity of the Department of Health and Human Services of the United States. The cooperation with The Lancet and Cochrane Collaboration continued for a 2002 workshop on Writing a Research Paper in Public Health and Biotechnology. The last workshop with international participation was held in 2003, when Edward Huth (Annals of Internal Medicine), Annette Flanagin (JAMA), Trish Groves (BMJ), and Chris Palmer (University of Cambridge) were the guest speakers. Methods Programme The CMJ course How to Plan and Write in Medical Research was first introduced in December 2002. It was distinctly practice-oriented, hands-on, concise and well-rounded [Table 1], and was run by a group of devoted teachers with solid knowledge and experience. The Zagreb School of Medicine provided the logistical support for the course. The classes were relatively small (up to 25 participants), and each attendee worked individually on a computer. The lecture rooms were equipped with modern teaching tools. Meals and refreshments were provided. Advertising When continuing medical education was introduced at the Zagreb School of Medicine, the CMJ saw it as an opportunity to offer its own short course. We had the advantage of speaking the local language and working in an academic setting, so that we could communicate directly with many physicians and scientists. That allowed us to advertise our short course continually, on a personal level. We also spread information about our course by sending leaflets to general practice offices, hospitals, and other health institutions. Announcements were placed on the web site of the School of Medicine and the CMJ. The Croatian Chamber of Physicians rated the course as contributing 11 licensing points, and advertized it in its monthly publication. The course also contributed 1.7 credits in the European Credit Transfer System of higher education, which made it attractive for graduate students. Assessment At the end of each course, all participants took a knowledge test. They also filled in an evaluation questionnaire in which they assessed four aspects of the course: usefulness, interestingness, information provided, and style of presentation (on a scale from 1 totally unsatisfied to 5 totally satisfied). Furthermore, each participant identified a peer to be taken as his or her control to compare the success of the course, i.e. the number of papers published in Pubmed-indexed journals before and after the course. The participants were asked to name a colleague who was of the same sex and similar age, professional field, and academic status. Results Each of the five short courses with international speakers was attended by 30 to 40 medical professionals from Croatia and neighbouring countries. The first course conducted solely by the CMJ editors was received enthusiastically and was followed by another only a few months later; a total of 14 courses have been conducted so far. On several occasions we were invited by individual institutions to teach their employees. Up to now, more than 300 medical and other professionals have attended the courses. The participants rated the course very positively: the average scores on the questionnaires from the last 10 courses were 4.50.2 on a scale from 1 to 5 for the usefulness of the courses, 4.50.2 for their interest, 4.50.1 for their informativeness, and 4.40.1 for the style of presentation. In their written comments, participants frequently suggested that the courses should be longer, with more practical work, and more instruction in statistical analysis. To assess the possible impact of the course on scientific output, we searched the Pubmed for the papers published by the participants of the first four CMJ courses (n=85) and their peer controls (n=76). Nine participants did not name their controls. The proportion of participants who published at least one paper did not differ from controls either before (P=0.146; -test) or after the course (P=0.156; -test). Before the course, 20 out of 85 (17%) participants published a total of 38 papers, and after the course, 25 (21%) published a total of 46 papers. Among the peer controls, 10 out of 76 (8%) published 38 papers before, and 15 (11%) published 29 papers after their counterparts attended the CMJ course. There were no statistically significant differences in number of published papers before and after the course, neither within the group of participants (P=0.359; McNemar test) nor in the group of their peer controls (P=0.424; McNemar test). Discussion In spite of the relatively high fee (130 ), demand for the CMJ course was steady during last three years, and we already have a waiting list for the next course, planned for December 2005. The high demand for the CMJ s courses in Croatia can be explained by several factors [Box 1]. First, we believe that our course is of high quality. It provides instruction on research planning, which is a prerequisite for any scientific work. The satisfaction of our clients is the best advertisement we can have. Second, the course is given in Croatian and is therefore suitable even for the people with poor knowledge of English, which is the usual language of international speakers and workshops. Third, the course has good logistics, ensuring an adequate learning environment and teaching tools. As there are few institutions that can provide a computer for each participant, our mobility is limited. Nevertheless, good logistics are necessary to maintain the high quality of the course. Fourth, the course is conducted by the editors of a locally recognized medical journal, which adds a unique dimension to the teaching, and gives the participants the feeling that they are personally connected to the journal. They are encouraged to use the knowledge and skills they have gained and submit their manuscripts to the CMJ. During the course, we sometimes discuss concrete problems that they face in their research, and offer help when needed. The course is a confidence-building process aiming to yield long-lasting results. It is always gratifying to receive a well-written paper from a researcher who attended one of our courses. Furthermore, it is easier for authors to send their manuscripts to editors whom they know personally. Last, but not least, the course is officially a part of continuing medical education for Croatian physicians. The significance of this formal administrative recognition should not be underestimated. We found no difference in scientific output of course participants vs. controls, measured by the number of papers published in Pubmed-indexed journals. This could be explained by the low dynamic of research and publishing in small scientific communities such as Croatia [6]. Since our courses were established less than three years ago, the significant increase in scientific output of participants may be expected in several years from now, as was shown in the study of the effect of editorial tutoring on the publishing activity of authors eight to twelve years after tutoring [7]. In contrast to the highly encouraging results in our country, attempts to give the course in neighbouring countries were somewhat disappointing. Although there is practically no language barrier for us in any of the countries of former Yugoslavia, we have succeeded in organizing only one workshop outside Croatia, in Mostar (Bosnia and Herzegovina), mainly because of an existing close partnership between the schools of medicine in Zagreb and Mostar. In conclusion, we suggest that science communication courses should be established and conducted locally, by local experts, using personal contacts as the primary means of advertising and increasing the demand. We believe there is much interest for such educational programs in developing and transitional countries (e.g. in southeastern Europe). The European Association of Science Editors could play a crucial role in training the teachers and helping them to start courses in their own scientific communities. Continuity and formal recognition of such local courses should be given high priority. The keys to the success of such courses are embedding them in the local environment and ensuring their structure and outcome. Acknowledgements We thank Drs Ana and Matko Marusic for their help in the preparation of this manuscript, and Darko Hren for his help in statistical analysis. References 1. Heseltine E. 2005. EASE workshops on science communication. European Science Editing 31(2):41-45. 2. Marusic M. 1997. Life of an editor-in-chief: first five years. Croatian Medical Journal 38(1):5-8. 3. Marusic M, Marusic A. 1999. Small scientific journals from small countries: breaking from a vicious circle of inadequacy. Croatian Medical Journal 40(4):508-14. 4. Marusic M, Marusic A. 2001. Good editor (HKcdfvg h q s ~   " , 4 y ~ 1 Z a u ¶ªŸª}rªgg\\hhhFmH sH hhhbmH sH hhhJ!mH sH hhhab6mH sH hhhF+mH sH hhhzSmH sH hhhabmH sH hhhRqF6mH sH hhhx5mH sH hhhRqFmH sH hhhRqF56mH sH hhhF+5mH sH hhhb5mH sH hhhRqF5mH sH $defve f g q r s + , hjln{|},- d7$8$H$gdF d7$8$H$gd+_j`u v   ! 5 G W x  >@BDPZdhjɽꅧ꧐ynhhhYmH sH hhhY6mH sH hhhUPCmH sH hhhF6mH sH hhh WmH sH hhhnmH sH hhhmH sH hhhRqF6mH sH hhhRqFmH sH hhhabmH sH hhhJ!mH sH hhhFmH sH hhhVaemH sH 'ikmn{)@Z4<\]rꚏꏃxxmbhhhY1mH sH hhh~mH sH hhh;/mH sH hhh<6mH sH hhh<mH sH hhhy"mH sH hhhF+6mH sH hhhRqF6mH sH hhhRqF5mH sH hhhxmH sH hhhYmH sH hhhabmH sH hhhRqFmH sH hhhF+mH sH #r+,14?@7OUlvwIdfy}AIԽԲȧԲԲԧԛԃxmhhhbmH sH hhh\tmH sH hhhRqF5mH sH h .hy6mH sH h .hRqF6mH sH hhhymH sH hhh;/mH sH hhh<mH sH hhhRqF6mH sH hhhRqFmH sH hhhY1mH sH hhh:mH sH hhh*mH sH *-!" 6"7"?"@""" & &P+Q+dgd+ d7$8$H$gd 4: d7$8$H$gd+!y|{~"ku߾ɾ߳ԾԉԉԾ~s~hhhh?B4mH sH hhhabmH sH hhh/mH sH hhh}pmH sH hhh9"mH sH h/9mH sH hhh 4:6mH sH hhhmH sH hhh 4:mH sH hhhPmH sH hhhnmH sH hhh}OmH sH hhhRqFmH sH hhh<mH sH ( 7 ? !!)!1!2!D!E!Y!Z![!\!]!|!!!!!!5"6"7"?""ɾԳԾti]hmrhRqF5mH sH hhhbmH sH hhhmH sH hmrmH sH hhhmH sH hhhy"mH sH hhh\tmH sH hhhmH sH hhh omH sH hhh?B4mH sH hhh 4:mH sH hhh1mH sH hhh}OmH sH hhh/mH sH hhhRqFmH sH !""#C#D###0$3$=$q$$$$$% %c%e%|%%%%% & &&"&O&&&&&&&&&&'޽޽޲zoddhhh<+gmH sH hhhPmH sH hhh omH sH hhhf,6mH sH hhhf,mH sH hhhmH sH hhhHbmH sH hhhabmH sH hhh4imH sH hhhxmH sH hhhmH sH hhhRqFmH sH hhhRqF6mH sH hhh9"mH sH &'q'r's'( (((@(B(V(X(b(f((())**S*V*^*_*`***O+Q+\+,,----}qf[[hhhRqFmH sH hhh]%mH sH hxhRqF5mH sH hhhmH sH hhhabmH sH hhhz6mH sH hhh6mH sH hhhUPCmH sH hhhzmH sH hhhHbmH sH hhhmH sH hmrmH sH hhh<+g6mH sH hhh<+gmH sH hhhnmH sH #Q+\+]+^+~--..//0033446688x;y;z;;<< d7$8$H$gdn d7$8$H$gdab d7$8$H$gd+--....:/\///////0081B1e1f1j1k1u1111*2-222F3G3a3b3o3p3334 4;4X444455*555螓}hhh(KmH sH hhh)mH sH hhh{mH sH hhh%a8mH sH hmrmH sH hhhxmH sH hhhmH sH hhh6mH sH hhh]%mH sH hhhmH sH hhhRqFmH sH hhhRqF6mH sH 15"626666668899y;;;;;<<<<%<&<=\]-].]]]znb`UUMhkqmH sH hhh9"mH sH UhhhRqF5mH sH hhh$5mH sH hhhB*mH phsH hhhmH sH hhh5mH sH hhhxmH sH hhh omH sH hhhnmH sH hhhRqFmH sH hhh%a8mH sH hxmH sH hhhhmH sH hhh]%mH sH hhh)mH sH <&<'<(<<<<<==K\L\]]]]]]] dh$Ifgdki d7$8$H$gdx d7$8$H$gd+ial practice: editors as educators. Croatian Medical Journal 42(2):113-20. 5. Marusic A, Marusic M. 2003. Teaching students how to read and write science: a mandatory course on scientific research and communication in medicine. Academic Medicine 78(12):1235-9. 6. Petrak J, Bozikov J. 2003. Journal publications from Zagreb University Medical School in 1995-1999. Croatian Medical Journal 44(6):681-689 ProgrammeType of classDuration (min)Research in health care practiceLecture45Importance of publishing a research paperLecture45Responsible conduct of researchLecture90Structure of research paperSeminar90Research planningSeminar60Study designSeminar60Research planningPractical work60Searching for informationPractical work90Statistical thinkingPractical work90Technical editing of research paperPractical work90Writing an abstractPractical work90  Box 1. Characteristics of a successful science communication course High quality course programme In local language Good logistics Association with a medical journal Official recognition; licensing points Continuity ]]]]]]^^^^__L_M_s_t_____i`j`k`hki hkqhhhhmH sH jhkqUmHnHuhkqmH sH h hkqmH sH hhhkqmH sH ]]]]]qeee dh$Ifgdki kd$$IflF #   t06    44 la]]^^"^qeee dh$Ifgdki kdY$$IflF #   t06    44 la"^#^C^K^N^qeee dh$Ifgdki kd$$IflF #   t06    44 laN^O^k^s^v^qeee dh$Ifgdki kd $$IflF #   t06    44 lav^w^^^^qeee dh$Ifgdki kdd$$IflF #   t06    44 la^^^^^qeee dh$Ifgdki kd$$IflF #   t06    44 la^^^^^qeee dh$Ifgdki kd$$IflF #   t06    44 la^^^^^qeee dh$Ifgdki kdo$$IflF #   t06    44 la^__$_'_qeee dh$Ifgdki kd$$IflF #   t06    44 la'_(_L_[_^_qeee dh$Ifgdki kd!$$IflF #   t06    44 la^___s___qeee dh$Ifgdki kdz$$IflF #   t06    44 la________`1`X`qee``XXXXX & Fgdkqgdkq d7$8$H$gdxkd$$IflF #   t06    44 la X`c`d`e`f`g`h`i`j`k` d7$8$H$gdxgdkq & Fgdkq 50P:pRqF/ =!"#$% W$$If!vh5 5 5 #v :Vl t65 W$$If!vh5 5 5 #v :Vl t65 W$$If!vh5 5 5 #v :Vl t65 W$$If!vh5 5 5 #v :Vl t65 W$$If!vh5 5 5 #v :Vl t65 W$$If!vh5 5 5 #v :Vl t65 W$$If!vh5 5 5 #v :Vl t65 W$$If!vh5 5 5 #v :Vl t65 W$$If!vh5 5 5 #v :Vl t65 W$$If!vh5 5 5 #v :Vl t65 W$$If!vh5 5 5 #v :Vl t65 W$$If!vh5 5 5 #v :Vl t65 @@@ RqFNormalCJ_HaJmHsHtHDAD Default Paragraph FontRi@R  Table Normal4 l4a (k(No ListFOF Dq4academic medicinemHsHj`j kq Table Grid7:V055~defvefgqrs+,    hijrs}~+,78pdeY Z e f g &!'!c"d" #!#F$G$1'2'''B*C*, ,....///////[0\011v1w11222222222 3333B3J3M3N3n3v3y3z333333333333333334'4*4+4@4O4R4S4w4444444444445*595\55555555550000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000I0[0@0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 00@0@0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@0@0@0@0@00I0s+,deY &!2'B*, ,..../v1w112222233M3N3y3z33333333334'4*4+4@4O4R4S4w444444445K00DQZK00K00K00K00K00K00K00K00K00K00 K00K00 :K00 K00K00K00K00K00 K00K00K00:K00K00 K00K00K00 K00K00 K00K00 K00K00 K00 K00 K0 0 K00 K0 0 K00 K00 K00 @0lK00K00K00@0l K0 0 K0 0 K0 0 @0l K00 K00 K00 @0l K00K00K00@0l K00u r"'-5]k`"#$&'()+,1-Q+<]]"^N^v^^^^^'_^__X`k` %*-23456789:;<=>j`!8@z(  B    B S  ?45 t :j3:j l:j 0:j4:j TB :j $:j t1:j/#:jo:jC :jD:jDD :j-#:j\F :j 4j:j":j Lk:jt :j 0:j &:j &:j  #:j :j  :j, :jT :j4 :jo :j$w(:j2#:j$ :jEEM66D??P!P!))/+u++++[-/O/j2j2q2|225     KTT@MMFFW!W!))9+|++++a-/Y/p2{22225  =*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceType=*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceNameh*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsCity0http://www.5iamas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags_*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagscountry-regionhttp://www.5iantlavalamp.com/V *urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplacehttp://www.5iantlavalamp.com/V*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PersonNamehttp://www.microsoft.com           ! 45Z Z &&*'*244444555)5*58595D5[5\5p5q555555544455)5*58595[5\555558<Z g &2' )C*222 33B3S4w44444)5*55545,@}RŖRh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hH,@}IHmr{YAy"kqki J!?,xb:+y9"f,;/Y1?B4Dq4%a8/9 4:UPCFRqFC~N}O WXA]f_Hbab?cVae<+g4i o}px)x19/xF+~]%nzSP\tz(K28U$*h6 .;<Mbx22222 3333B3J3M3N3n3v3y3z333333333333333334'4*4+4@4O4R4S4w444444445@//ܜ/ //@{d  g g!+15`@`` @`(`T@`,`\@`@UnknownGz Times New Roman5Symbol3& z Arial?5 z Courier New;Wingdings"1/baT-AaT-A!r4dt4t4 2QHX)?RqF21Is there a need for science communication coursesDarioDario Oh+'0$ 4@ ` l x 4Is there a need for science communication coursesDario Normal.dotDario20Microsoft Office Word@u7@@b`ȍ@vDaT-՜.+,0( hp  Medicinski fakultetAt4 2Is there a need for science communication courses Title  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?ABCDEFGIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abdefghijlmnopqruRoot Entry F{RDwData @1TableH5WordDocument7~SummaryInformation(cDocumentSummaryInformation8kCompObjq  FMicrosoft Office Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q