аЯрЁБс>ўџ 02ўџџџ/џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџьЅСq`јПqbjbjqPqP .::qџџџџџџЄ6666666JЎЎЎЎЪ J, ьтјјјјјјј‹       $ h€јБ 6ЩјјЩЩБ 66јјЦ *G G G Щ6ј6ј‹ G Щ‹ G G 66G јж ахr5fХЎл (G ‹ № <, G x .xG x6G DјvnTG ТDУјјјБ Б 1 јјј, ЩЩЩЩJJJdЎJJJЎJJJ666666џџџџ Comparison of spatial behaviour of translocated and non-translocated brown bears in Europe. Rauer G1, Huber D2, Kazensky P3, Knauer, F.3, Mustoni A4, Palazon S5, Quenette PY6, Zibordi F4, 1 WWF, Austria,  HYPERLINK "mailto:georg.rauer@baer.wwf.at" georg.rauer@baer.wwf.at, 2 University of Zagreb, Croatia, 3 University of Freiburg, Germany, 4 Adamello Brenta Natural Park, Italy, 5Generalitat de Cataluna, Spain, 6Office Nationale de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, France. In the framework of three brown bear conservation programs in European Union (LIFE projects), 16 adult and subadult brown bears were successively translocated from Slovenia and Croatia to Austria, France and Italy. Two females and 1 male were released in Austria between 1989-1993 and in France between 1996-1997 and 3 males and 7 females released in Italy between 1999-2002. During this period 34 males and 14 females were captured both in Slovenia and Croatia and radiotracked in the framework of monitoring studies of brown bear populations in these two countries. The aim of this study is twofold i) describe the spatial behavior of bears released in a new environment and compare it with non-translocated brown bears from source population; ii) give critical biological data for managers planning future translocations. Analysis of spatial behaviour was done by calculating serial and annual home ranges, comparing home ranges between successive years and by calculating straight line distances between successive daily radio locations. On average translocated bears exhibited a higher mobility and a larger home range in the year of their translocation than non-translocated bears of the same age and sex class. For translocated bears the release point did not necessarily become a central point in the home range as several bears never revisited the area. Our results show the possible variation in the spatial behavior managers have to expect when translocating bears. Further analysis are needed to determine how much of this variation can be explained by differences in habitat distribution and quality, bear density or individual traits of translocated bears. \]defno{|~ˆ‰‹”• ЁЃЎЏАКЛНОПЬЮЯћќ§юнвЧЛЧвЏвЏвЄ˜ЄвЏвЏвЧЛЧвЏвЄŒвr`r#jh/HљhЉxиUmH sH jh/HљhЉxиUmH sH h/HљhЉxиmH sH h/HљhЉxиH*mH sH h/Hљh/HљH*mH sH h/Hљh/HљmH sH h/HљhH*mH sH h/HљhѓtDH*mH sH h/HљhѓtDmH sH h/HљhmH sH !h/HљhB*CJmH phџsH !h/HљhѓtDB*CJmH phџsH !\]Оу ф х nopq§ћѓѓћюћћЉћћDC$EЦ€iњ•F$a$$a$gd/Hљ q§§    9 : \ ] ƒ „ Ѓ Є Ѕ с W _ ‡ › > V a s Ђ Ѓ З Ф љ  79Kn‰ЇЉкх489ѓфйЭТЭТЭТЭТйЖйТЋТ Т • ••Т•Т‚Т•Т•Т•Т•Ћ•w•h/HљhЋ&mH sH h/Hљh>mH sH hxЉmH sH h/HљhE-эmH sH h/HљhБVmH sH h/HљhxЉmH sH h/HљhЉxиH*mH sH h/HљhmH sH h/HљhH*mH sH h/HљhЉxиmH sH jh/HљhЉxиUmH sH h/HљhЉxи0JmH sH *9:nqђчмh/HљhmH sH h/HљhЋ&mH sH h/HљhE-эhE-эmH sH ,1hА‚. АЦA!А‰"А‰#‰$‰%ААФАФ ФуDаЩъyљКЮŒ‚ЊKЉ georg.rauer@baer.wwf.atрЩъyљКЮŒ‚ЊKЉ >mailto:georg.rauer@baer.wwf.at†œ@@ёџ@ NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH DA@ђџЁD Default Paragraph FontViѓџГV  Table Normal :V і4ж4ж laі (kєџС(No List FB@ђF Body Text5B*\mH phџfsH 6U@Ђ6 Hyperlink >*B*phџB'ЂB E-эComment ReferenceCJaJ<"< E-э Comment TextCJaJ@j!"@ E-эComment Subject5\H™BH E-э Balloon TextCJOJQJ^JaJqџџџџ\]Оуфх nopsIˆ0Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€§9q q q ЮќqXџ„џџГ'ДLД'Ќи…Е'фEЖ'џЗ'l8И'єLЙ'мjК'„ўTфDDžЋЋsZы IIІВВsB*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags€country-region€9*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags€place€ >]bqy~„‹’—žЃЋБИIQ^fgm“›ЌЕЬбвйЗУ?@4=РФХЮЯж—Єs[ь§цьs333W_ ЉкхsРФs х >БVЋ&ѓtDk “xЉ…s­ЉxиE-э/Hљџ@€Р„aq`@џџUnknown KaczenskyџџџџџџџџџџџџGю‡z €џTimes New Roman5€Symbol3&ю ‡z €џArial5&ю ‡za€џTahoma"1ˆ№ФЉЕќ•FЕќ•FB/B/!№‰‰ДД24dmm 2ƒQ№мHP№џ?фџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџѓtD2џџ[Comparaison of spatial behaviour of translocated and non-translocated brown bears in Europe Djuro Huberўџр…ŸђљOhЋ‘+'Гй0Ф˜ќ ,@ T` € Œ ˜ЄЌДМт\Comparaison of spatial behaviour of translocated and non-translocated brown bears in Europe  Normal.dot Djuro Huber2Microsoft Office Word@FУ#@ўЬ3fХ@ўЬ3fХB/ўџеЭеœ.“—+,љЎDеЭеœ.“—+,љЎˆD hp|„Œ” œЄЌД М $т mц \Comparaison of spatial behaviour of translocated and non-translocated brown bears in Europe Titleќ PœЄДдш№ _PID_HLINKS_AdHocReviewCycleID_EmailSubject _AuthorEmail_AuthorEmailDisplayName_PreviousAdHocReviewCycleID_ReviewingToolsShownOnceтAxT|mailto:georg.rauer@baer.wwf.atgИƒ“Papergeorg.rauer@baer.wwf.at Jіrg RauerйSЂЪ ўџџџўџџџўџџџ !"#$%&ўџџџ()*+,-.ўџџџ§џџџ1ўџџџўџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџRoot Entryџџџџџџџџ РFРz5fХ3€Data џџџџџџџџџџџџ1TableџџџџWordDocumentџџџџ.SummaryInformation(џџџџџџџџџџџџDocumentSummaryInformation8џџџџџџџџ'CompObjџџџџџџџџџџџџqџџџџџџџџџџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџўџ џџџџ РFMicrosoft Office Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.8є9Вq