Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 178696
Implant Prosthodontic Therapy: Evaluation of Peri-implant Bone Changes
Implant Prosthodontic Therapy: Evaluation of Peri-implant Bone Changes // Journal of Dental Research 2004. / Herzberg, Mark C. (ur.).
Minneapolis (MN): IADR ; AADR ; CADR, 2004. (poster, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 178696 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Implant Prosthodontic Therapy: Evaluation of Peri-implant Bone Changes
Autori
Knezović Zlatarić, Dubravka ; Čelebić, Asja ; Kobler, Pavao ; Živko-Babić, Jasenka ; Pandurić, Josip
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Izvornik
Journal of Dental Research 2004.
/ Herzberg, Mark C. - Minneapolis (MN) : IADR ; AADR ; CADR, 2004
Skup
82nd general session & exhibition of the IADR/AADR/CADR
Mjesto i datum
Honolulu (HI), Sjedinjene Američke Države, 10.03.2004. - 13.03.2004
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Poster
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
bone mineral density; implants
Sažetak
Objectives: Severe loss of peri-implant supporting bone traditionally leads to the removal of the affected implant. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether the bone mineral density (BMD) values differ in 1) group of the patients with different implant placements, 2) in group of patients with different implant prosthodontic therapy and 3) in group of the patients with different duration of the implant loading. The aim was also to compare measured BMD values around the implants with BMD values measured on the matching opposing natural teeth in the jaw. Methods: Periapical radiographs, standardized using copper stepwedge, were made in 20 patients with 43 implants in maxilla and mandible. BMD measurements were performed in vivo using clinical intraoral microdensitometry method. All the measured values were expressed in equivalents of copper stepwedge thicknesses. Results: Results revealed different BMD values between patients with implants in maxilla and mandible, as well as between different prosthodontic loadings (p<0.05). Conclusion: The method used in this study is useful in assessments of BMD around implants.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Dentalna medicina