Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 177617

A Comparsion Of Two Scheduling Methods


Burcar, Ivana; Radujković, Mladen
A Comparsion Of Two Scheduling Methods // Proceedings of 6th International Conference Organisation, Technology and Management in Construction / Radujković, Mladen ; Završki, Ivica (ur.).
Zagreb: Hrvatska Udruga za Organizaciju Građenja, 2003. str. 40-47 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 177617 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
A Comparsion Of Two Scheduling Methods

Autori
Burcar, Ivana ; Radujković, Mladen

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni

Izvornik
Proceedings of 6th International Conference Organisation, Technology and Management in Construction / Radujković, Mladen ; Završki, Ivica - Zagreb : Hrvatska Udruga za Organizaciju Građenja, 2003, 40-47

Skup
6th International Conference Organisation, Technology and Management in Construction

Mjesto i datum
Mošćenička Draga, Hrvatska, 17.09.2003. - 20.09.2003

Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje

Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija

Ključne riječi
scheduling; Critical Path; Critical Chain; float; buffer

Sažetak
The paper describes some of the differences between Critical Path Method (CPM) and Critical Chain Method (CCM). Particular attention is focused on differences between the float known from CPM and buffer known from CCM. Comparing to floats, buffers seems more attractive because of generating the early warning system. An investigation of two scenarios confirmed that when number of activities in the chain is constant, the CCM project duration is retained the constant portion of joined CPM duration, no depending of altering activity durations. On the contrary, when number of activities in the chain changes, the CCM project duration changes portion to related CPM duration. By transferring a part of totally available time from activity duration used in CPM to buffer in CCM, a new situation will result with need for more care about monitoring process and communication among project participants

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Građevinarstvo



POVEZANOST RADA


Projekti:
0082208

Ustanove:
Građevinski fakultet, Zagreb


Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Burcar, Ivana; Radujković, Mladen
A Comparsion Of Two Scheduling Methods // Proceedings of 6th International Conference Organisation, Technology and Management in Construction / Radujković, Mladen ; Završki, Ivica (ur.).
Zagreb: Hrvatska Udruga za Organizaciju Građenja, 2003. str. 40-47 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
Burcar, I. & Radujković, M. (2003) A Comparsion Of Two Scheduling Methods. U: Radujković, M. & Završki, I. (ur.)Proceedings of 6th International Conference Organisation, Technology and Management in Construction.
@article{article, author = {Burcar, Ivana and Radujkovi\'{c}, Mladen}, year = {2003}, pages = {40-47}, keywords = {scheduling, Critical Path, Critical Chain, float, buffer}, title = {A Comparsion Of Two Scheduling Methods}, keyword = {scheduling, Critical Path, Critical Chain, float, buffer}, publisher = {Hrvatska Udruga za Organizaciju Gra\djenja}, publisherplace = {Mo\v{s}\'{c}eni\v{c}ka Draga, Hrvatska} }
@article{article, author = {Burcar, Ivana and Radujkovi\'{c}, Mladen}, year = {2003}, pages = {40-47}, keywords = {scheduling, Critical Path, Critical Chain, float, buffer}, title = {A Comparsion Of Two Scheduling Methods}, keyword = {scheduling, Critical Path, Critical Chain, float, buffer}, publisher = {Hrvatska Udruga za Organizaciju Gra\djenja}, publisherplace = {Mo\v{s}\'{c}eni\v{c}ka Draga, Hrvatska} }




Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font