Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1281197
Survey on reporting of epithelial cells in urine sediment as part of external quality assessment programs in Brazilian laboratories
Survey on reporting of epithelial cells in urine sediment as part of external quality assessment programs in Brazilian laboratories // Biochemia medica, 31 (2021), 2; 020711, 6 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1281197 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Survey on reporting of epithelial cells in urine
sediment as part of external quality assessment
programs in Brazilian laboratories
Autori
Poloni, Jose A. T. ; Vieira, Adriana de Oliveira ; dos Santos, Caroline R. M. ; Simundic, Ana-Maria ; Rotta, Liane N.
Izvornik
Biochemia medica (1330-0962) 31
(2021), 2;
020711, 6
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
External Quality Assessment Program ; epithelial cells ; survey ; urinalysis
Sažetak
Introduction: Epithelial cells (ECs) are structures regularly observed during urine microscopy analysis. The correct identification of EC subtypes can be useful since renal tubular epithelial cells (RTECs) are clinically relevant. We investigate the urinary ECs report and the judgement of its clinical importance by Brazilian laboratories. Materials and methods: A survey with four questions was made available to participants of the Urinalysis External Quality Assessment Program (EQAP) from Controllab. Laboratories composed 3 groups: (1) differentiating ECs subtypes: "squamous", "transitional" and "RTECs" ; (2) differentiating ECs subtypes: "squamous" or "non- squamous" cells ; (3) without ECs subtype identification. Participants did not necessarily answer to all questions and the answers were evaluated both within the same laboratory's category and within different categories of laboratories. Results: A total of 1336 (94%) laboratories answered the survey ; Group 1, 119/140 (85%) reported that ECs differentiation is important to the physician and 62% want to be evaluated by EQAP, while in Group 3, 455/1110 (41%) reported it is useful to them, however only 25% want be evaluated by EQAP. Group 2 laboratories 37/51 (73%) reported that the information is important, but only 13/52 (25%) are interested in an EQAP with differentiation of the 3 ECs subtypes. Conclusion: Most of the laboratories do not differentiate ECs in the three subtypes, despite the clinical importance of RTECs. Education of laboratory staff about the clinical significance of urinary particles should be considered a key priority.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kemija, Farmacija
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Farmaceutsko-biokemijski fakultet, Zagreb,
Klinička bolnica "Sveti Duh"
Profili:
Ana-Maria Šimundić
(autor)
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE