Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1271384
Flat Versus Simulated Mountain Trail Running: A Multidisciplinary Comparison in Well-Trained Runners
Flat Versus Simulated Mountain Trail Running: A Multidisciplinary Comparison in Well-Trained Runners // International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20 (2023), 6; 1-12 doi:10.3390/ijerph20065189 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1271384 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Flat Versus Simulated Mountain Trail Running: A Multidisciplinary
Comparison in Well-Trained Runners
Autori
Skroce, Kristina ; Bettega, Simone ; D’Emanuele, Samuel ; Boccia, Gennaro ; Schena, Federico ; Tarperi, Cantor
Izvornik
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (1660-4601) 20
(2023), 6;
1-12
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
energy expenditure ; running ; endurance training ; electromyography
Sažetak
This paper compares cardiopulmonary and neuromuscular parameters across three running aerobic speeds in two conditions that differed from a treadmill’s movement: flat condition (FC) and unpredictable roll variations similar to mountain trail running (URV). Twenty well-trained male runners (age 33 ± 8 years, body mass 70.3 ± 6.4 kg, height 1.77 ± 0.06 m, V˙ O2max 63.8 ± 7.2 mL·kg−1·min−1) voluntarily participated in the study. Laboratory sessions consisted of a cardiopulmonary incremental ramp test (IRT) and two experimental protocols. Cardiopulmonary parameters, plasma lactate (BLa−), cadence, ground contact time (GT) and RPE values were assessed. We also recorded surface electromyographic (sEMG) signals from eight lower limb muscles, and we calculated, from the sEMG envelope, the amplitude and width of peak muscle activation for each step. Cardiopulmonary parameters were not significantly different between conditions (V˙ O2: p = 0.104 ; BLa−: p = 0.214 ; HR: p = 0.788). The amplitude (p = 0.271) and width (p = 0.057) of sEMG activation peaks did not change between conditions. The variability of sEMG was significantly affected by conditions ; indeed, the coefficient of variation in peak amplitude (p = 0.003) and peak width (p < 0.001) was higher in URV than in FC. Since the specific physical demands of running can differ between surfaces, coaches should resort to the use of non- traditional surfaces, emphasizing specific surface-related motor tasks that are normally observed in natural running environments. Seeing that the variability of muscle activations was affected, further studies are required to better understand the physiological effects induced by systematic surface-specific training and to define how variable-surface activities help injury prevention.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Scopus
- MEDLINE