Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1261033

Comparison of three different protocols for obtaining hemolysis


Nikolac Gabaj, Nora; Miler, Marijana; Vrtarić, Alen; Ćelap, Ivana; Boćan, Marina; Filipi, Petra; Radišić Biljak, Vanja; Šimundic, Ana- Maria; Šupak Smolčić, Vesna; Kocijančić, Marija
Comparison of three different protocols for obtaining hemolysis // Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine (CCLM), 60 (2022), 5; 714-725 doi:10.1515/cclm-2021-1227 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 1261033 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Comparison of three different protocols for obtaining hemolysis

Autori
Nikolac Gabaj, Nora ; Miler, Marijana ; Vrtarić, Alen ; Ćelap, Ivana ; Boćan, Marina ; Filipi, Petra ; Radišić Biljak, Vanja ; Šimundic, Ana- Maria ; Šupak Smolčić, Vesna ; Kocijančić, Marija

Izvornik
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine (CCLM) (1434-6621) 60 (2022), 5; 714-725

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
hemolysis ; interference ; osmotic shock ; preanalytical errors

Sažetak
Objectives: Hemolysis is associated with erroneous or delayed results. Objectives of the study were to compare four different methods for obtaining hemolysis in vitro on three different analyzers. Methods: Hemolysis was prepared with addition of pure hemoglobin into serum pool, osmotic shock, aspiration through blood collection needle, freezing/thawing of whole blood. Biochemistry parameters were measured in duplicate at Architect c8000 (Abbott, Abbott Park, USA), Beckman Coulter AU680 (Beckman Coulter, Brea, USA) and Cobas 6000 c501 (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), according to manufacturers' declarations. Cut-off value was defined as the highest value of H index with corresponding bias lower than acceptance criteria. Results: We were not able to obtain results with freezing protocol. On all three platforms, lowest number of analytes were sensitive to hemolysis at H=0.5 using method of adding free hemoglobin. When osmotic shock was used, cut-off values for the most analytes were generally met at lower values. Hemolysis significantly interfered with measurement of potassium and lactate dehydrogenase (LD) at H=0.5 on all platforms. The most of the tested analytes had the lowest acceptable H index when aspiration method was used. At the low level of hemolysis (H=0.8) glucose, sodium, potassium, chloride, phosphate, and LD were affected on all analyzers, with some additional analytes depending on the manufacturer. Conclusions: Hemolysis interference differs on different analyzers and according to protocol for obtaining hemolysis. Aspiration method was generally the most sensitive to hemolysis interference, while addition of free Hb was the most resistant.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Farmaceutsko-biokemijski fakultet, Zagreb,
Medicinski fakultet, Rijeka,
Klinička bolnica "Sveti Duh",
KBC "Sestre Milosrdnice",
KBC Split,
Medicinski fakultet, Split,
Klinički bolnički centar Rijeka

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

doi

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Nikolac Gabaj, Nora; Miler, Marijana; Vrtarić, Alen; Ćelap, Ivana; Boćan, Marina; Filipi, Petra; Radišić Biljak, Vanja; Šimundic, Ana- Maria; Šupak Smolčić, Vesna; Kocijančić, Marija
Comparison of three different protocols for obtaining hemolysis // Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine (CCLM), 60 (2022), 5; 714-725 doi:10.1515/cclm-2021-1227 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
Nikolac Gabaj, N., Miler, M., Vrtarić, A., Ćelap, I., Boćan, M., Filipi, P., Radišić Biljak, V., Šimundic, A., Šupak Smolčić, V. & Kocijančić, M. (2022) Comparison of three different protocols for obtaining hemolysis. Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine (CCLM), 60 (5), 714-725 doi:10.1515/cclm-2021-1227.
@article{article, author = {Nikolac Gabaj, Nora and Miler, Marijana and Vrtari\'{c}, Alen and \'{C}elap, Ivana and Bo\'{c}an, Marina and Filipi, Petra and Radi\v{s}i\'{c} Biljak, Vanja and \v{S}imundic, Ana- Maria and \v{S}upak Smol\v{c}i\'{c}, Vesna and Kocijan\v{c}i\'{c}, Marija}, year = {2022}, pages = {714-725}, DOI = {10.1515/cclm-2021-1227}, keywords = {hemolysis, interference, osmotic shock, preanalytical errors}, journal = {Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine (CCLM)}, doi = {10.1515/cclm-2021-1227}, volume = {60}, number = {5}, issn = {1434-6621}, title = {Comparison of three different protocols for obtaining hemolysis}, keyword = {hemolysis, interference, osmotic shock, preanalytical errors} }
@article{article, author = {Nikolac Gabaj, Nora and Miler, Marijana and Vrtari\'{c}, Alen and \'{C}elap, Ivana and Bo\'{c}an, Marina and Filipi, Petra and Radi\v{s}i\'{c} Biljak, Vanja and \v{S}imundic, Ana- Maria and \v{S}upak Smol\v{c}i\'{c}, Vesna and Kocijan\v{c}i\'{c}, Marija}, year = {2022}, pages = {714-725}, DOI = {10.1515/cclm-2021-1227}, keywords = {hemolysis, interference, osmotic shock, preanalytical errors}, journal = {Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine (CCLM)}, doi = {10.1515/cclm-2021-1227}, volume = {60}, number = {5}, issn = {1434-6621}, title = {Comparison of three different protocols for obtaining hemolysis}, keyword = {hemolysis, interference, osmotic shock, preanalytical errors} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Current Contents Connect (CCC)
  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
    • SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
  • Scopus
  • MEDLINE


Citati:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font