Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1258985
A Systematic Review of Peer Assessment Approaches to Evaluation of Open-Ended Student Assignments
A Systematic Review of Peer Assessment Approaches to Evaluation of Open-Ended Student Assignments // 2022 45th Jubilee International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO)
Opatija, Hrvatska, 2022. str. 1076-1081 doi:10.23919/mipro55190.2022.9803770 (poster, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1258985 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
A Systematic Review of Peer Assessment Approaches to
Evaluation of Open-Ended Student Assignments
(A Systematic Review of Peer Assessment Approaches
to Evaluation of Open-Ended
Student Assignments)
Autori
Fertalj, M. ; Brkic, L J. ; Mekterovic, I.
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Skup
2022 45th Jubilee International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO)
Mjesto i datum
Opatija, Hrvatska, 23.05.2022. - 27.05.2022
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Poster
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
computer science education , online education , peer assessment , systematic review , collaborative learning , development of peer assessment skills , calibrated peer review , credibility index , metrics
Sažetak
Students enrolled in computer science courses should develop logical thinking during their studies and learn to apply theoretical knowledge to open-ended problems, where subjective assessment is expected, and a single solution does not exist. With the enrollment of an increasing number of students, the manual grading of open- ended assignments requires a greater workload for the teaching staff. Peer assessment, where students evaluate each other’s solutions, is suitable for grading open-ended assignments and benefits the learning process of students as well as relieves the teacher’s workload.This paper provides an overview of existing peer assessment strategies and methodologies, and analysis of published performance results of algorithms for grading evaluation that are already in use in (under)graduate courses or under development. We compare calibration approaches and systematically catalog problems and improvements published by various authors researching same or similar problems. The aim of this paper is to underline areas already marked for possible improvement or overlooked but justified of further study.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Računarstvo
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Fakultet elektrotehnike i računarstva, Zagreb