Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1250824
Spotlight on the Corneal Back Surface Astigmatism: A Review
Spotlight on the Corneal Back Surface Astigmatism: A Review // Clinical Ophthalmology, Volume 15 (2021), 3157-3164 doi:10.2147/opth.s284616 (međunarodna recenzija, pregledni rad, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1250824 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Spotlight on the Corneal Back Surface Astigmatism: A
Review
Autori
Patel, Sudi ; Tutchenko, Larysa
Izvornik
Clinical Ophthalmology (1177-5483) Volume 15
(2021);
3157-3164
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, pregledni rad, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
astigmatism ; back surface ; cornea ; radius ; refractive index ; thickness
Sažetak
Recent evidence indicates that the corneal back surface astigmatism (CBSA) contributes to the refractive state of the eye in cataract surgery, especially with the implantation of toric intraocular lenses. But this has been met with some scepticism. A review of key studies performed over the past three decades shows that the mean CBSA power ranges from 0.18(±0.16)D to 1.04(±0.20)D. The clinical assessment of CBSA is problematic. There is poor agreement between the current automated systems for assessment of CBSA and it is assumed that these systems directly measure the CBSA. But CBSA cannot be measured directly in vivo. A historical review of methods used to quantify the curvature of the posterior corneal surface reveals that CBSA estimated by current systems is based on values for corneal front surface astigmatism, corneal refractive index, central corneal thickness, corneal thickness at peripheral locations and the exact distance between the corneal apex and each one of these peripheral locations. Doubts and errors in these values, coupled with the precise details of the algorithm incorporated to estimate CBSA, are the likely sources of the lack of agreement between current systems. These systematic errors cloud the assessment of CBSA. Mean CBSA may be low, but it varies from case to case. There is a clear need for a realistic, practical procedure for clinicians to independently calibrate systems for estimating CBSA. This would help to reduce uncertainty and the discrepancies between instruments designed to measure the same parameter
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Rijeka
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
- Scopus