Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1249473
Challenges with defining a meta-epidemiological study as “study in which the unit of analysis is a study, not a patient”: author’s reply
Challenges with defining a meta-epidemiological study as “study in which the unit of analysis is a study, not a patient”: author’s reply // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, (2022), 1-2 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.12.003 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1249473 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Challenges with defining a meta-epidemiological
study as “study in which the unit of analysis is a
study, not a patient”: author’s reply
Autori
Puljak, Livia
Izvornik
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (0895-4356)
(2022);
1-2
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
systematic reviews
Sažetak
I appreciate Furukawa et al. addressing my suggestion that caution is needed when labelling a study as “meta-epidemiological” [1]. My intention was not to impose a narrow definition of a “meta-epidemiological study” in line with its origins [2]. Instead, I intended to point out that many authors diverge from the definition from 2002 [3] and, consequently, the meaning of the descriptor “meta-epidemiological study” is nowadays unclear, without consensus in the research community.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Javno zdravstvo i zdravstvena zaštita
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE
