Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1240840
QUALITY OF LEGISLATIVE PROCESS. Building a conceptual model and developing indicators
QUALITY OF LEGISLATIVE PROCESS. Building a conceptual model and developing indicators, 2021. doi:10.2887/704311 (izvještaj).
CROSBI ID: 1240840 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
QUALITY OF LEGISLATIVE PROCESS. Building a conceptual
model and developing indicators
Autori
European Commission Directorate-General for Structural Reforms Support / Mackie, Iain ; Musa, Anamarija Musa ; Nemec, Juraj ; Reinholde, Iveta ; Trifonova, Tihomira ; Virtanen, Turo ; Wolfs, Wouter
Vrsta, podvrsta
Ostale vrste radova, izvještaj
Godina
2021
Ključne riječi
legislative process, legislation, lawmaking, quality of legislation, rulemaking
Sažetak
The report summarises the situation in the parliamentary systems of Belgium (two chambers), Bulgaria, Croatia, Finland, Latvia and Slovakia, and is accompanied by three separate case study reports covering northern, central and southern EU. It maps the end-to-end process in each country from introduction to promulgation of primary legislation, to describe the steps, rules, procedures and standards, and the support to parliamentarians in performing their roles. In doing so, the thematic expert group (TEG) remained mindful of comparable processes in government, especially regarding openness, use of evidence, impact assessment and stakeholder engagement. It also considered whether the source of legislative initiatives (government, parliament, citizen), category of legislation (e.g. organic law, constitutional amendment) and subject of legislation (e.g. healthcare, defence) could have an impact on the model and indicators. Based on these parliamentary practices, the TEG has proposed a conceptual model which is structured on five key principles: integrity (in the sense of soundness and wholeness) ; transparency ; inclusiveness ; robustness and rigour ; and predictability and regularity. Each principle was then elaborated as two or three topics, resulting in the presentation here of 28 proposed practical and operable indicators, each of which is assessed on a ‘hanging fruit’ scale of 1 (very low) to 4 (medium-high).
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo