Naslov
Did an introduction of CONSORT for abstracts guidelines improve reporting quality of randomised controlled trials’ abstracts on Helicobacter pylori infection? Observational study

Autori
Vrebalov Cindro, Pavle ; Bukic, Josipa ; Pranić, Shelly ; Leskur, Dario ; Rušić, Doris ; Šešelja Perišin, Ana ; Božić, Joško ; Vuković, Jonatan ; Modun, Darko

Izvornik
BMJ Open (2044-6055) 12 (2022), 3; 1-9

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
Abstracting and Indexing ; Checklist ; Helicobacter Infections ; Helicobacter pylori ; Humans ; Publications

Sažetak
Objective To determine abstracts’ adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials for Abstracts (CONSORT-A) statement and to explore the factors associated with reporting quality. Design An observational study. Setting Abstracts of randomised controlled trials published between 2010 and 2019, found searching the MEDLINE database. Participants A total of 451 abstracts of the clinical trials on Helicobacter pylori infections were included. Primary and secondary outcome measures Abstracts’ reporting quality was determined by assessing their adherence to 17-item CONSORT-A checklist, with overall score being calculated as the sum of items that were adequately reported for each abstract. Additional factors that might influence the reporting quality of the abstracts were analysed, with univariate and multivariate linear regression used to determine how those factors influenced the overall reporting quality. Results Included abstracts had an overall median quality score of 8/17 (IQR 7–9). Large proportions of abstracts adequately reported interventions, participants, objectives, numbers randomised and conclusions (97.1, 99.3, 89.1. 94.7 and 98.4% of abstracts, respectively). Trial design, randomisation, blinding and funding were severely under-reported with only 8.0, 2.7, 11.0 and 2.0% of abstracts reporting each item. Overall quality scores for H. pylori abstracts were higher in association with CONSORT-A endorsement (B=5.698 ; 95% CI 1.781 to 9.615), pharmacological interventions (B=4.063 ; 95% CI 0.224 to 7.902), multicentre settings (B=5.057 ; 95% CI 2.370 to 7.743), higher numbers of participants (B=3.607 ; 95% CI 1.272 to 5.942), hospital settings (B=4.827 ; 95% CI 1.753 to 7.901) and longer abstracts (B=3.878 ; 95% CI 0.787 to 6.969 for abstracts with 251–300 words and B=7.404 ; 95% CI 3.930 to 10.878 for abstracts with more than 300 words). Conclusions The overall reporting quality of abstracts was inadequate. The endorsement of CONSORT-A guidelines by more journals might improve the standards of reporting.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti, Javno zdravstvo i zdravstvena zaštita, Integrativna bioetika (prirodne, tehničke, biomedicina i zdravstvo, biotehničke, društvene, humanističke znanosti)

POVEZANOST RADA