Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1234637
Midazolam versus Dexmedetomidine in Patients at Risk of Obstructive Sleep Apnea during Urology Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Midazolam versus Dexmedetomidine in Patients at Risk of Obstructive Sleep Apnea during Urology Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial // Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11 (2022), 19; 1-9 doi:10.3390/jcm11195849 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1234637 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Midazolam versus Dexmedetomidine in Patients at
Risk of Obstructive Sleep Apnea during Urology
Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Autori
Vuković, Ivan ; Duplančić, Božidar ; Benzon, Benjamin ; Đogaš, Zoran ; Kovač, Ruben ; Pecotić, Renata
Izvornik
Journal of Clinical Medicine (2077-0383) 11
(2022), 19;
1-9
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
dexmedetomidine ; midazolam ; STOP BANG questionnaire ; intraoperative complications ; spinal anesthesia ; sedation ; obstructive sleep apnea ; transurethral resection of bladder ; transurethral resection of prostate
Sažetak
Abstract: Benzodiazepines are the most commonly used sedatives for the reduction of patient anxiety. However, they have adverse intraoperative effects, especially in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients. This study aimed to compare dexmedetomidine (DEX) and midazolam (MDZ) sedation considering intraoperative complications during transurethral resections of the bladder and prostate regarding the risk for OSA. This study was a blinded randomized clinical trial, which included 115 adult patients with a mean age of 65 undergoing urological procedures. Patients were divided into four groups regarding OSA risk (low to medium and high) and choice of either MDZ or DEX. The doses were titrated to reach a Ramsay sedation scale score of 4/5. The intraoperative complications were recorded. Incidence rates of desaturations (44% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.0001), snoring (76% vs. 49%, p = 0.0008), restlessness (26.7% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.0044), and coughing (42.1% vs. 14.5%, p = 0.0001) were higher in the MDZ group compared with DEX, independently of OSA risk. Having a high risk for OSA increased the incidence rates of desaturation (51.2% vs. 15.7%, p < 0.0001) and snoring (90% vs. 47.1%, p < 0.0001), regardless of the sedative choice. DEX produced fewer intraoperative complications over MDZ during sedation in both low to medium risk and high-risk OSA patients.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
KBC Split,
Medicinski fakultet, Split
Profili:
Renata Pecotić
(autor)
Zoran Đogaš
(autor)
Benjamin Benzon
(autor)
Božidar Duplančić
(autor)
Ivan Vuković
(autor)
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI