Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1225263
The reporting checklist for public versions of guidelines: RIGHT-PVG
The reporting checklist for public versions of guidelines: RIGHT-PVG // Implementation Science, 16(10) (2021), s13012-020-01066-z, 10 doi:10.1186/s13012-020-01066-z (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1225263 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
The reporting checklist for public versions of
guidelines: RIGHT-PVG
Autori
Wang, Xiaoqin ; Chen, Yaolong ; Akl, Elie A. ; Tokalić, Ružica ; Marušić, Ana ; Qaseem, Amir ; Falck-Ytter, Yngve ; Soo Lee, Myeong ; Siedler, Madelin ; Barber, Sarah L ; Zhang, Mingming ; Chan, Edwin SY ; Estill, Janne ; Kwong, Joey SW ; Okumura, Akiko ; Zhou, Qi ; Yang, Kehu ; Norris, Susan L
Kolaboracija
RIGHT Working Group
Izvornik
Implementation Science (1748-5908) 16(10)
(2021);
S13012-020-01066-z, 10
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Guideline ; Public or patient version of guidelines ; Reporting quality ; Reporting checklist
Sažetak
Abstract Background Public or patient versions of guidelines (PVGs) are derivative documents that “translate” recommendations and their rationale from clinical guidelines for health professionals into a more easily understandable and usable format for patients and the public. PVGs from different groups and organizations vary considerably in terms of quality of their reporting. In order to address this issue, we aimed to develop a reporting checklist for developers of PVGs and other potential users. Methods First, we collected a list of potential items through reviewing a sample of PVGs, existing guidance for developing and reporting PVGs or other similar evidence-based patient tools, as well as qualitative studies on original studies of patients’ needs about the content and/or reporting of information in PVGs or similar evidence-based patient tools. Second, we conducted a two-round Delphi consultation to determine the level of consensus on the items to be included in the final reporting checklist. Third, we invited two external reviewers to provide comments on the checklist. Results We generated the initial list of 45 reporting items based on a review of a sample of 30 PVGs, four PVG guidance documents, and 46 relevant studies. After the two-round Delphi consultation, we formed a checklist of 17 items grouped under 12 topics for reporting PVGs. Conclusion The RIGHT-PVG reporting checklist provides an international consensus on the important criteria for reporting PVGs.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Javno zdravstvo i zdravstvena zaštita
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
HRZZ-IP-2019-04-4882 - Profesionalizam u zdravstvu: odlučivanje u praksi i znanosti (ProDeM) (Marušić, Ana, HRZZ ) ( CroRIS)
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Split
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE