Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1225122
Reporting of the safety from allergic rhinitis trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and in publications: An observational study
Reporting of the safety from allergic rhinitis trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and in publications: An observational study // BMC Medical Research Methodology, 22 (2022), 262, 5 doi:10.1186/s12874-022-01730-6 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1225122 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Reporting of the safety from allergic rhinitis trials registered on
ClinicalTrials.gov and in publications: An observational study
Autori
Paladin, Ivan ; Pranić, Shelly Melissa
Izvornik
BMC Medical Research Methodology (1471-2288) 22
(2022);
262, 5
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Adverse events ; Allergic rhinitis ; ClinicalTrials.gov ; Completeness ; Randomised controlled trial ; Safety.
Sažetak
Background: Incomplete and inconsistent reporting of adverse events (AEs) through multiple sources can distort impressions of the overall safety of the medical interventions examined as well as the benefit-risk relationship. We aimed to assess completed allergic rhinitis (AR) trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov for completeness and consistency of AEs reporting comparing ClinicalTrials.gov and corresponding publications. Methods: We retrospectively examined completed randomised controlled trials on AR registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on or after 9/27/2009 to trials updated with results on or before 12/31/2021 along with any corresponding publications. Complete reporting of AEs in ClinicalTrials.gov were summarised in tables describing AE information, and complete reporting in publications was an explicit statement of serious AE, death or other AE. Difference in completeness, number, or description of AEs between ClinicalTrials.gov and publication was classified as inconsistent reporting of AEs. Results: There were 99 registered trials with 45 (45.5%) available publications. All published trials completely reported AEs in ClinicalTrials.gov, and 21 (46.7%) in publications (P < .001). In 43 (95.6%) publications, there was at least one inconsistency in the reporting of AEs (P < .001). 8 (17.8%) publications had different number of serious AEs (P = .003), 36 (80.0%) of other AEs (P < .001) while deaths reporting was inconsistent in 8 (57.1%) publications (P = .127). Conclusion: The reporting of AEs from AR trials is complete in ClinicalTrials.gov and incomplete and inconsistent in corresponding publications. There is a need to improve the reporting of AEs from AR trials in corresponding publications, and thus to improve patient safety.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Temeljne medicinske znanosti, Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Split
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE