Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1218476
Verification of automatic analysers Roller 20PN and iSED for measuring erythrocyte sedimentation rate
Verification of automatic analysers Roller 20PN and iSED for measuring erythrocyte sedimentation rate // Biochemia medica, 32 (2022), 1; 010708, 8 doi:10.11613/BM.2022.010708 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, stručni)
CROSBI ID: 1218476 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Verification of automatic analysers Roller 20PN and
iSED for measuring erythrocyte sedimentation rate
Autori
Čičak, Helena ; Šonjić, Pavica ; Šimundić, Ana-Maria
Izvornik
Biochemia medica (1330-0962) 32
(2022), 1;
010708, 8
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, stručni
Ključne riječi
automated ESR ; Westergren method ; blood sedimentation rate ; verification ; haematology
Sažetak
Introduction: Automated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) analysers are based on different methodology than Westergren method. It is questionable whether ESR values obtained from those analysers are comparable with determined values with Westergren method. The aim was verification of the precision, method comparison and accuracy of automated ESR analysers: Roller 20PN (Alifax S.p.A., Polverara, Italy) and iSED (Alcor Scientific, Smithfield, USA). Materials and methods: Blood samples (N = 752 for Roller 20PN and N = 213 for iSED) were sampled into K2 EDTA (Kima, Italy) tubes for automated and 3.8% Na- citrate tubes (Kima, Italy) for Westergren method. The data was divided into three groups according to the ESR values obtained with the Westergren method: Group Low (L) (ESR ≤ 20 mm), Group Medium (M) (ESR 21-60 mm), and Group High (H) (ESR ≥ 61 mm). Method agreement was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis and Passing- Bablok regression. Results: Analyser iSED has shown better comparability with Westergren method (bias 0.0 (95%Cl -1.4 to 1.5) range than Roller 20 PN (bias = - 6.4 (95%Cl - 7.1 to -5.7) in the whole measuring. For Roller 20 PN, Passing-Bablok regression has shown constant and proportional difference for Groups L and M, and for iSED only for Group H. Roller 20 PN had lower sensitivity (0.51 (95%Cl: 0.45-0.57) than iSED (0.72 (95%Cl: 0.59-0.80) while they had comparable specificity (> 0.90) and accuracy (≥ 0.80) in comparison with the Westergren method. Conclusion: Both analysers are not comparable with the Westergren method and should not be used interchangeably
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Farmaceutsko-biokemijski fakultet, Zagreb,
Klinička bolnica "Sveti Duh"
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE