Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1202899
Verification policies in Croatian medical biochemistry laboratories: a survey of the practice
Verification policies in Croatian medical biochemistry laboratories: a survey of the practice // Biochemia medica, 32 (2022), 2; 020703, 9 doi:10.11613/BM.2022.020703 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1202899 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Verification policies in Croatian medical
biochemistry laboratories: a survey of the practice
Autori
Milevoj Kopčinović, Lara ; Juričić, Gordana ; Bokulić, Adriana ; Vukasović, Ines ; Ćelap, Ivana ; Čičak, Helena ; Kocijančić, Marija ; Miloš, Marija ; Lovrić, Mila ; Siter Kuprešanin, Marija ; Hrabrić Vlah, Snježana ; Miletić, Manuela
Izvornik
Biochemia medica (1330-0962) 32
(2022), 2;
020703, 9
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Accreditation ; Examination procedures ; Verification ; Survey
(accreditation ; examination procedures ; verification ; survey)
Sažetak
Introduction The aim of this study was to screen practices used in verification procedures for methods/analysers among medical biochemistry laboratories (MBLs) in Croatia. We hypothesized that these procedures differ widely from laboratory to laboratory and wanted to gather specific data on steps used in the verification workflow. Materials and methods In order to obtain data, an online survey was conducted. The survey, divided in two sections, contained 29 questions and statements addressing general characteristics and specific steps of the verification workflow of each individual MBL. The survey was disseminated among managers of all MBLs in Croatia. Results A total of 108/196 (55%) laboratories participated in the survey. Forty nine MBLs were excluded from the second part of the survey: 14 have not implemented verification procedures, and 35 MBLs due to the absence of answers. The most relevant results of the second part of the survey showed that: 18/59 (0.31) of the responding MBLs have difficulties when defining acceptance criteria, 27/59 (0.46) used the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute protocol for precision estimation ; the majority of MBLs used a median of 20 samples for method/analyser comparisons and estimated bias using internal quality control samples ; reference intervals provided by external sources are mainly adopted ; 60% of MBLs do not include linearity verification in their protocol and do not use the national document for the estimation of measurement uncertainty. Conclusions Heterogeneous verification protocols are routinely utilized across Croatian MBLs which clearly confirms that a national document might help in the harmonization of verification procedures.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti, Farmacija
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Farmaceutsko-biokemijski fakultet, Zagreb,
Medicinski fakultet, Zagreb,
Klinička bolnica "Sveti Duh",
KBC "Sestre Milosrdnice",
Klinički bolnički centar Zagreb,
Klinički bolnički centar Rijeka,
Hrvatsko katoličko sveučilište, Zagreb
Profili:
Adriana Bokulić
(autor)
Ivana Ćelap
(autor)
Manuela Miletić
(autor)
Mila Lovrić
(autor)
Marija Miloš
(autor)
Helena Čičak
(autor)
Ines Vukasović
(autor)
Lara Milevoj Kopčinović
(autor)
Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:
Pristup cjelovitom tekstu rada doi hrcak.srce.hr pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov hrcak.srce.hrCitiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE