Naslov
Experiences and attitudes of medical professionals on treatment of end-of-life patients in intensive care units in the Republic of Croatia: a cross- sectional study

Autori
Špoljar, Diana ; Vučić, Marinko ; Peršec, Jasminka ; Merc, Vlasta ; Kereš, Tatjana ; Radonić, Radovan ; Poljaković, Zdravka ; Nesek Adam, Višnja ; Karanović, Nenad ; Čaljkušić, Krešimir ; Župan, Željako ; Grubješić, Igor ; Kopić, Jasminka ; Vranković, Srđan ; Krobot, Renata ; Nevajdić, Bojana ; Golubić, Mia ; Grosek, Štefan ; Kujundžić Tiljak, Mirjana ; Štajduhar, Andrija ; Tonković, Dinko ; Borovečki, Ana

Izvornik
BMC Medical Ethics (1472-6939) 23 (2022); 12, 13

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
intensive care units ; end-of-life care ; end-of-life decision-making ; ethics

Sažetak
Background: Decisions about limitations of life sustaining treatments (LST) are made for end-of- life patients in intensive care units (ICUs). The aim of this research was to explore the professional and ethical attitudes and experiences of medical professionals on treatment of end-of- life patients in ICUs in the Republic of Croatia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among physicians and nurses working in surgical, medical, neurological, and multidisciplinary ICUs in the total of 9 hospitals throughout Croatia using a questionnaire with closed and open type questions. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to reduce data to a smaller set of summary variables. Mann–Whitney U test was used to analyse the diferences between two groups and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to analyse the diferences between more than two groups. Results: Less than third of participants (29.2%) stated they were included in the decision-making process, and physicians are much more included than nurses (p<0.001). Sixty two percent of participants stated that the decisionmaking process took place between physicians. Eighteen percent of participants stated that ‘do-not-attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitations’ orders were frequently made in their ICUs. A decision to withdraw inotropes and antibiotics was frequently made as stated by 22.4% and 19.9% of participants, respectively. Withholding/withdrawing of LST were ethically acceptable to 64.2% of participants. Thirty seven percent of participants thought there was a signifcant diference between withholding and withdrawing LST from an ethical standpoint. Seventy-nine percent of participants stated that a verbal or written decision made by a capable patient should be respected. Physicians were more inclined to respect patient’s wishes then nurses with high school education (p=0.038). Nurses were more included in the decision- making process in neurological than in surgical, medical, or multidisciplinary ICUs (p<0.001, p=0.005, p=0.023 respectively). Male participants in comparison to female (p=0.002), and physicians in comparison to nurses with high school and college education (p<0.001) displayed more liberal attitudes about LST limitation. Conclusions: DNACPR orders are not commonly made in Croatian ICUs, even though limitations of LST were found ethically acceptable by most of the participants. Attitudes of paternalistic and conservative nature were expected considering Croatia’s geographical location in Southern Europe.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Biotehnologija u biomedicini (prirodno područje, biomedicina i zdravstvo, biotehničko područje)

POVEZANOST RADA