Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1175951

Comparison of Different Radiographic Image Receptors


Grgat, Josip; Matijaš, Tatjana
Comparison of Different Radiographic Image Receptors // Radiološki vjesnik, (2021), 1; 2-10 (domaća recenzija, pregledni rad, stručni)


CROSBI ID: 1175951 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Comparison of Different Radiographic Image Receptors

Autori
Grgat, Josip ; Matijaš, Tatjana

Izvornik
Radiološki vjesnik (0352-9835) (2021), 1; 2-10

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, pregledni rad, stručni

Ključne riječi
detektorske ploče ; digitalna radiografija ; fotokonduktori ; kompjutorizirana radiografija ; scintilatori
(computed radiography ; detector plates ; digital radiography ; photoconductors ; scintillators)

Sažetak
The aim of this study is to compare detector plates (radiographic image receptors) used in digital radiology. Detector plates are divided into computed radiography systems (phosphor plates) and digital radiography systems (CCD, CMOS, silicon photodiodes and flat panel detector). Phosphor plates use the principle of radiation-induced photostimulable luminescence, and can be read with the help of a laser reader (digitizer). Digital radiology systems are divided into indirect and direct ; indirect are those that require the conversion of x-rays into photons of visible light and use scintillators for that matter, while direct x-rays are directly converted into charges with the use of photoconductors. Out of all the scintillators, cesium iodide has shown the best properties through research, while amorphous selenium proved to be the optimal photoconductor. CCD, CMOS and silicon photodiode are exclusively indirect digital detector systems, while flat panel detector can be found in both direct and indirect format. CCD slot scan detector system with full frame signal reading mode, active pixel CMOS detector, and silicon photodiode with back-illuminated PDA have shown the best results among detectors of their kind, while indirect type flat panel detectors with cesium iodide scintillator proved to be the optimal choice in modern radiography as evidenced by research with PBU-S-3, CDRAD 2.0 and TRG phantom.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Sveučilište u Splitu Sveučilišni odjel zdravstvenih studija

Profili:

Avatar Url Tatjana Matijaš (autor)

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

hdrt.hr

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Grgat, Josip; Matijaš, Tatjana
Comparison of Different Radiographic Image Receptors // Radiološki vjesnik, (2021), 1; 2-10 (domaća recenzija, pregledni rad, stručni)
Grgat, J. & Matijaš, T. (2021) Comparison of Different Radiographic Image Receptors. Radiološki vjesnik, (1), 2-10.
@article{article, author = {Grgat, Josip and Matija\v{s}, Tatjana}, year = {2021}, pages = {2-10}, keywords = {detektorske plo\v{c}e, digitalna radiografija, fotokonduktori, kompjutorizirana radiografija, scintilatori}, journal = {Radiolo\v{s}ki vjesnik}, number = {1}, issn = {0352-9835}, title = {Comparison of Different Radiographic Image Receptors}, keyword = {detektorske plo\v{c}e, digitalna radiografija, fotokonduktori, kompjutorizirana radiografija, scintilatori} }
@article{article, author = {Grgat, Josip and Matija\v{s}, Tatjana}, year = {2021}, pages = {2-10}, keywords = {computed radiography, detector plates, digital radiography, photoconductors, scintillators}, journal = {Radiolo\v{s}ki vjesnik}, number = {1}, issn = {0352-9835}, title = {Comparison of Different Radiographic Image Receptors}, keyword = {computed radiography, detector plates, digital radiography, photoconductors, scintillators} }




Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font