Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1170637
Comparison between external locking plate fixation and conventional external fixation for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures: a finite element analysis
Comparison between external locking plate fixation and conventional external fixation for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures: a finite element analysis // Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 17 (2022), 16; 1-9 doi:10.1186/s13018-021-02907-3 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1170637 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Comparison between external locking plate fixation
and conventional external fixation for
extraarticular proximal tibial fractures: a finite
element analysis
Autori
Blažević, Dejan ; Kodvanj, Janoš ; Adamović, Petra ; Vidović, Dinko ; Trobonjača, Zlatko ; Sabalić, Srećko
Izvornik
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research (1749-799X) 17
(2022), 16;
1-9
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
finite element analysis ; locking plate ; external fixator ; tibia ; fracture
Sažetak
Good clinical outcomes for locking plates as an external fixator to treat tibial fractures have been reported. However, external locking plate fixation is still generally rarely performed. This study aimed to compare the stability of an external locking plate fixator with that of a conventional external fixator for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures using finite element analysis. Methods: Three models were constructed: (1) external locking plate fixation of proximal tibial fracture with lateral proximal tibial locking plate and 5-mm screws (ELP), (2) conventional external fixation of proximal tibial fracture with an 11-mm rod and 5-mm Schanz screws (EF-11), and (3) conventional external fixation of a proximal tibial fracture with a 7-mm rod and 5- mm Schanz screws (EF-7). The stress distribution, displacement at the fracture gap, and stiffness of the three finite element models at 30-, 40-, 50-, and 60-mm plate–rod offsets from the lateral surface of the lateral condyle of the tibia were determined. Results: The conventional external fixator showed higher stiffness than the external locking plate fixator. In all models, the stiffness decreased as the distance of the plate– rod from the bone surface increased. The maximum stiffness was 121.06 N/mm in the EF-11 model with 30-mm tibia–rod offset. In the EF-7 model group, the maximum stiffness was 40.00 N/mm in the model with 30-mm tibia–rod offset. In the ELP model group, the maximum stiffness was 35.79 N/mm in the model with 30-mm tibia–plate offset. Conclusions: Finite element analysis indicated that external locking plate fixation is more flexible than conventional external fixation and can influence secondary bone healing. External locking plate fixation requires the placement of the plate as close as possible to the skin, which allows for a low-profile design because the increased distance from the plate to the bone can be too flexible for bone healing. Further experimental mechanical model tests are necessary to validate these finite element models, and further biological analysis is necessary to evaluate the effect of external locking plate fixation on fracture healing.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Interdisciplinarne tehničke znanosti, Temeljne medicinske znanosti, Kliničke medicinske znanosti, Interdisciplinarne biotehničke znanosti, Biotehnologija u biomedicini (prirodno područje, biomedicina i zdravstvo, biotehničko područje)
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Rijeka,
Stomatološki fakultet, Zagreb,
Fakultet strojarstva i brodogradnje, Zagreb,
KBC "Sestre Milosrdnice",
Medicinski fakultet, Split,
Zdravstveno veleučilište, Zagreb
Profili:
Dinko Vidović
(autor)
Srećko Sabalić
(autor)
Petra Adamović
(autor)
Zlatko Trobonjača
(autor)
Janoš Kodvanj
(autor)
Dejan Blažević
(autor)
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE