Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1153419
Validity and Reliability of IPAQ-SF and GPAQ for Assessing Sedentary Behaviour in Adults in the European Union: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Validity and Reliability of IPAQ-SF and GPAQ for Assessing Sedentary Behaviour in Adults in the European Union: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // International journal of environmental research and public health, 18 (2021), 9; 4602, 17 doi:10.3390/ijerph18094602 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1153419 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Validity and Reliability of IPAQ-SF and GPAQ for Assessing Sedentary
Behaviour in Adults in the European Union: A Systematic Review and
Meta-Analysis
Autori
Meh, Kaja ; Jurak, Gregor ; Sorić, Maroje ; Rocha, Paulo ; Sember, Vedrana
Izvornik
International journal of environmental research and public health (1660-4601) 18
(2021), 9;
4602, 17
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
human activities ; exercise ; lifestyle ; physical fitness ; surveys and questionnaires ; self-report ; public health surveillance
Sažetak
Current lifestyles are marked by sedentary behaviour ; thus, it is of great importance for policymaking to have valid and reliable tools to measure sedentary behaviour in order to combat it. Therefore, the aim of this review and meta-analysis is to critically review, assess, and compile the reliability, criterion validity, and construct validity of the single-item sedentary behaviour questions within national language versions of most commonly used international physical activity questionnaires for adults in the European Union: The International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form and the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire. A total of 1749 records were screened, 287 full-text papers were read, and 14 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results and quality of studies were evaluated by the Quality Assessment of Physical Activity Questionnaires checklist. Meta-analysis indicated moderate to high reliability (rw = 0.59) and concurrent validity (rw = 0.55) of national language versions of single-item sedentary behaviour questions. Criterion validity was rather low (rw = 0.23) but in concordance with previous studies. The risk of bias analysis highlighted the poor reporting of methods and results, with a total bias score of 0.42. Thus, we recommend using multi-item SB questionnaires and smart trackers for providing information on SB rather than single-item sedentary behaviour questions in physical activity questionnaires
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Javno zdravstvo i zdravstvena zaštita
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE