Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1148476
Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review
Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review // Science and Engineering Ethics, 27 (2021), 1; 4, 20 doi:10.1007/s11948-021-00281-1 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1148476 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in
Research Performing Organisations and Research
Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review
Autori
Ščepanović, Rea ; Labib, Krishma ; Buljan, Ivan ; Tijdink, Joeri ; Marušić, Ana
Izvornik
Science and Engineering Ethics (1353-3452) 27
(2021), 1;
4, 20
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Research ethics ; Research funding organisations ; Research integrity ; Research integrity practices ; Research integrity promotion ; Research performing organisations
Sažetak
Research integrity (RI) is a continuously developing concept, and increasing emphasis is put on creating RI promotion practices. This study aimed to map the existing RI guidance documents at research performing organisations (RPOs) and research funding organisations (RFOs). A search of bibliographic databases and grey literature sources was performed, and retrieved documents were screened for eligibility. The search of bibliographical databases and reference lists of selected articles identified a total of 92 documents while the search of grey literature sources identified 118 documents for analysis. The retrieved documents were analysed based on their geographical origin, research field and organisational origin (RPO or RFO) of RI practices, types of guidance presented in them, and target groups to which RI practices are directed. Most of the identified practices were developed for research in general, and are applicable to all research fields (n = 117) and medical sciences (n = 78). They were mostly written in the form of guidelines (n = 136) and targeted researchers (n = 167). A comprehensive search of the existing RI promotion practices showed that initiatives mostly come from RPOs while only a few RI practices originate from RFOs. This study showed that more RI guidance documents are needed for natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities since only a small number of documents was developed specifically for these research fields. The explored documents and the gaps in knowledge identified in this study can be used for further development of RI promotion practices in RPOs and RFOs.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Integrativna bioetika (prirodne, tehničke, biomedicina i zdravstvo, biotehničke, društvene, humanističke znanosti)
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Split
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE