Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1113426
Mediterranean diet assessment challenges: Validation of the Croatian Version of the 14- item Mediterranean Diet Serving Score (MDSS) Questionnaire
Mediterranean diet assessment challenges: Validation of the Croatian Version of the 14- item Mediterranean Diet Serving Score (MDSS) Questionnaire // PLoS One, 16 (2021), 3; 1-22 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0247269 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1113426 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Mediterranean diet assessment challenges:
Validation of the Croatian Version of the 14-
item Mediterranean Diet Serving Score (MDSS)
Questionnaire
Autori
Marendić, Mario ; Polić, Nikolina ; Matek, Helena ; Oršulić, Lucija ; Polašek, Ozren ; Kolčić, Ivana
Izvornik
PLoS One (1932-6203) 16
(2021), 3;
1-22
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Mediterranean diet ; reliability ; validity ; questionnaire ; Croatia
Sažetak
Mediterranean diet (MD) is among the most commonly investigated diets and recognized as one of the healthiest dietary patterns. Due to its complexity, geographical and cultural variations, it also represents a challenge for quantification. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess reliability and validity of the Croatian version of the 14-item Mediterranean Diet Serving Score (MDSS), using the Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS) as the referent test. We included the exploratory sample of 360 medical students, and a confirmatory sample of 299 health studies students from the University of Split, Croatia. Test-retest reliability and validity of the MDSS were tested using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), while Cohen's kappa statistic was used to test correct classification of subjects into MD adherent/non-adherent category. A very good reliability was shown for the overall MDSS score (ICC = 0.881 [95% CI 0.843-0.909]), and a moderate reliability for the binary adherence (κ = 0.584). Concurrent validity of the MDSS was also better when expressed as a total score (ICC = 0.544 [0.439-0.629]) as opposed to the adherence (κ = 0.223), with similar result in the confirmatory sample (ICC = 0.510 [0.384- 0.610] ; κ = 0.216). Disappointingly, only 13.6% of medical students were adherent to the MD according to MDSS, and 19.7% according to the MEDAS questionnaire. Nevertheless, MDSS score was positively correlated with age (ρ = 0.179: P = 0.003), self-assessed health perception (ρ = 0.123 ; P = 0.047), and mental well-being (ρ = 0.139: P = 0.022). MDSS questionnaire is a short, reliable and reasonably valid instrument, and thus useful for assessing the MD adherence, with better results when used as a numeric score, even in the population with low MD adherence.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Split,
Sveučilište u Splitu Sveučilišni odjel zdravstvenih studija
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE