Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1109303
Benchmarking metagenomic classification tools for long read sequencing data
Benchmarking metagenomic classification tools for long read sequencing data // 28th International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology (ISMB) 2020
online;, 2020. doi:10.7490/f1000research.1118120.1 (poster, međunarodna recenzija, pp prezentacija, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1109303 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Benchmarking metagenomic classification tools for
long read sequencing data
Autori
Josip Marić ; Sylvain Riondet ; Krešimir Križanović ; Niranjan Nagarajan ; Mile Šikić
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, pp prezentacija, znanstveni
Skup
28th International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology (ISMB) 2020
Mjesto i datum
Online;, 13.07.2020. - 16.07.2020
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Poster
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
Metagenomics ; long read sequencing ; taxonomic classification
Sažetak
In recent years, both long-read sequencing and metagenomic analysis have been significantly advanced. Although long-read sequencing technologies have been primarily used for de novo genome assembly, they are rapidly maturing for widespread use in other applications. In particular, long reads could potentially lead to more precise taxonomic identification which has sparked an interest in using them for metagenomic analysis. Here we present a benchmark of several tools for metagenomic taxonomic classification, tested on in- silico datasets that were constructed using real long reads from isolate sequencing. We compared tools that were either newly developed for or modified to work with long reads, including Kraken, Centrifuge, CLARK, MetaMaps and MEGAN-LR. The test datasets were constructed with varying numbers of bacterial and eukaryotic genomes, to simulate different metagenomic applications. The tools were tested on their ability to accurately detect species and precisely estimate species abundances in the samples. Our analysis showed that all tested classifiers provide useful results, and that accuracy was strongly influenced by the comprehensiveness of the default database used. Using the same database for all tools provided comparable results across methods except for MetaMaps which had slightly better performance, but was slower than k-mer based tools.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Računarstvo
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Fakultet elektrotehnike i računarstva, Zagreb