Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1088186

Comparison of mechanical, chemical and physical human models of in vivo skin damage: Randomized controlled trial


Leskur, Dario; Perišić, Ivana; Romac, Kristina; Šušak, Helena; Šešelja Perišin, Ana; Bukić, Josipa; Rušić, Doris; Kladar, Nebojša; Božin, Biljana; Modun, Darko
Comparison of mechanical, chemical and physical human models of in vivo skin damage: Randomized controlled trial // Skin research and technology, 27 (2020), 2; 207-216 doi:10.1111/srt.12932 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 1088186 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Comparison of mechanical, chemical and physical human models of in vivo skin damage: Randomized controlled trial

Autori
Leskur, Dario ; Perišić, Ivana ; Romac, Kristina ; Šušak, Helena ; Šešelja Perišin, Ana ; Bukić, Josipa ; Rušić, Doris ; Kladar, Nebojša ; Božin, Biljana ; Modun, Darko

Izvornik
Skin research and technology (0909-752X) 27 (2020), 2; 207-216

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
in vivo skin damage models ; non‐invasive methods ; skin barrier recovery ; sodium lauryl sulphate ; tape stripping ; ultraviolet radiation

Sažetak
Introduction Human in vivo models of skin damage were often used in research of cutaneous disorders. The most commonly used models were tape‐stripping as mechanical, sodium lauryl sulphate‐induced irritation as chemical and ultraviolet radiation as physical damage model. In regard to differences between models, they were expected to have different responses to damage and recovery, with unique skin parameters’ changes over time. Objective The aim was to compare skin parameters in three different skin damage models on the same anatomical location, with and without topical treatment. Methods Four test sites on each forearm were randomly assigned to three skin damage models with the fourth sites on each forearm chosen as a control, undamaged site. Skin parameters were assessed using non‐invasive methods. Results Sodium lauryl sulphate irritation caused the strongest damage with delayed reaction to the irritant. Tape stripping leads to highest initial skin barrier disruption but afterwards it showed the fastest skin recovery. Ultraviolet radiation did not affect skin barrier function, but it elevated skin erythema and melanin level. Tested preparation did not lead to changes in measured parameters. Conclusion The skin of the participants had different response to three skin damage models with distinct changes of skin parameters and recovery. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT03783819.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Farmacija



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Split

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

doi onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Leskur, Dario; Perišić, Ivana; Romac, Kristina; Šušak, Helena; Šešelja Perišin, Ana; Bukić, Josipa; Rušić, Doris; Kladar, Nebojša; Božin, Biljana; Modun, Darko
Comparison of mechanical, chemical and physical human models of in vivo skin damage: Randomized controlled trial // Skin research and technology, 27 (2020), 2; 207-216 doi:10.1111/srt.12932 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
Leskur, D., Perišić, I., Romac, K., Šušak, H., Šešelja Perišin, A., Bukić, J., Rušić, D., Kladar, N., Božin, B. & Modun, D. (2020) Comparison of mechanical, chemical and physical human models of in vivo skin damage: Randomized controlled trial. Skin research and technology, 27 (2), 207-216 doi:10.1111/srt.12932.
@article{article, author = {Leskur, Dario and Peri\v{s}i\'{c}, Ivana and Romac, Kristina and \v{S}u\v{s}ak, Helena and \v{S}e\v{s}elja Peri\v{s}in, Ana and Buki\'{c}, Josipa and Ru\v{s}i\'{c}, Doris and Kladar, Neboj\v{s}a and Bo\v{z}in, Biljana and Modun, Darko}, year = {2020}, pages = {207-216}, DOI = {10.1111/srt.12932}, keywords = {in vivo skin damage models, non‐invasive methods, skin barrier recovery, sodium lauryl sulphate, tape stripping, ultraviolet radiation}, journal = {Skin research and technology}, doi = {10.1111/srt.12932}, volume = {27}, number = {2}, issn = {0909-752X}, title = {Comparison of mechanical, chemical and physical human models of in vivo skin damage: Randomized controlled trial}, keyword = {in vivo skin damage models, non‐invasive methods, skin barrier recovery, sodium lauryl sulphate, tape stripping, ultraviolet radiation} }
@article{article, author = {Leskur, Dario and Peri\v{s}i\'{c}, Ivana and Romac, Kristina and \v{S}u\v{s}ak, Helena and \v{S}e\v{s}elja Peri\v{s}in, Ana and Buki\'{c}, Josipa and Ru\v{s}i\'{c}, Doris and Kladar, Neboj\v{s}a and Bo\v{z}in, Biljana and Modun, Darko}, year = {2020}, pages = {207-216}, DOI = {10.1111/srt.12932}, keywords = {in vivo skin damage models, non‐invasive methods, skin barrier recovery, sodium lauryl sulphate, tape stripping, ultraviolet radiation}, journal = {Skin research and technology}, doi = {10.1111/srt.12932}, volume = {27}, number = {2}, issn = {0909-752X}, title = {Comparison of mechanical, chemical and physical human models of in vivo skin damage: Randomized controlled trial}, keyword = {in vivo skin damage models, non‐invasive methods, skin barrier recovery, sodium lauryl sulphate, tape stripping, ultraviolet radiation} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Current Contents Connect (CCC)
  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
    • SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
  • Scopus
  • MEDLINE


Citati:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font